Posted on 11/19/2023 10:45:52 AM PST by grey_whiskers
Myocarditis Thrombosis Thrombocytopenia Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Vasculitis Guillain-Barré Syndrome Lymphadenopathy Anaphylaxis Myopericarditis Allergic Reactions Bell’s Palsy Axillary Adenopathy Pericarditis Acute Myelitis Perimyocarditis Intracerebral Haemorrhage Immune-Mediated Hepatitis Facial Nerve Palsy Neurological Symptoms Haemorrhage Immune-Mediated Disease Outbreaks Takotsubo cardiomyopathy Cardiac Rhabdomyolysis Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Cardiovascular events Acute Hyperactive Encephalopathy Acute Kidney Injury Multiple Sclerosis Bleeding Episodes Cutaneous Adverse Effects Skin Reactions Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome Capillary Leak Syndrome Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Petechiae Purpura Annularis Telangiectodes Pulmonary Embolism Psoriasis Nephrotic Syndrome Bullous Drug Eruption Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Pulmonary Embolism Blood Clots Thrombophilia iTTP episode Refractory Status Epilepticus Central Serous Retinopathy Cutaneous Reactions Prion Disease Pregnant Woman Process-Related Impurities CNS Inflammation CNS Demyelination Orofacial Brain Haemorrhage Varicella Zoster Virus Nerve And Muscle Adverse Events Oculomotor Paralysis Parsonage-Turner Syndrome Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy Lipschütz ulcers (Vaginal ulcers) Amyotrophic Neuralgia Polyarthralgia Thyroiditis Keratolysis (Corneal Melting) Arthritis Thymic hyperplasia Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome Hailey-Hailey Disease Acute Lympholysis Interstitial Lung Disease Vesiculobullous Cutaneous Reactions Hematologic Conditions Hemolysis Headache Acute Coronary Syndrome ANCA Glomerulonephritis Neurologic Phantosmia Uveitis Pathophysiologic Alterations Inflammatory Myositis Still’s Disease Pityriasis Rosea Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Sweet’s Syndrome Sensorineural Hearing Loss Serious Adverse Events Among Health Care Professionals Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Ocular Adverse Events Depression Pancreas Allograft Rejection Acute Hemichorea-Hemibalismus Alopecia Areata Graves’ Disease Cardiovascular Events Metabolic Syndrome Eosinophilic Dermatosis Hypercoagulability Neuroimaging Findings in Post COVID-19 Vaccination Urticaria Central Vein Occlusion Thrombophlebitis Squamous Cell Carcinoma Chest Pain Acute Inflammatory Neuropathies Brain Death Kounis Syndrome Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Gastroparesis Asthma Safety Monitoring of the Janssen Vaccine Myocardial Injury Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Neurological Autoimmune Diseases V-REPP Herpes Simplex Virus Related Material
I don't care. Given that Pfizer made $120 billion of the clot shots, and that Moderna went from being $1.7 billion in debt to raking in the dough -- and that there are all kinds of "studies" including in NEJM, which say they are *sponsored by Pfizer* ...
And that Pfauci and Pfizer have openly lied about all kinds of things concerning masks, the biodistribution of jab product in the body, the deaths in their clinical trials, the composition of the clot shots, side effects, the origin of the virus, and so on...
Raising yourself to your full height and shouting "SCIENCE!" at me is going to go over about as well as a screen door in a submarine.
Your ship is sinking. Better bail out soon, before the women who have lost babies or have been rendered infertile by the clot shot, find out where you live.
Have you considered New Zealand?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Nope.
I flame because you are trolls, not because I am emotionally invested.
Incidentally you missed post #7.
These papers are in chronological order.
The number of shots administered, the number of side effects, the knowledge of the side effects, and the admission within the medical / scientific community, have all been changing over time.
There are other posts in the form of memes which show all the successive rearguard actions by the pro-jab fanatics (or worse) as each successive lie about the clot shots is mentioned, then confirmed, then entering common awareness despite your best efforts to keep a lid on things.
Not to mention the practice of Pfauci of lying about things, the revolving door between Big Pharma and the regulators, and the pressure (including firings, the threatened loss of hospital privileges, affiliations, job or licensure loss, and so on, ALL prssed only against those who come out against the PFauci narrative.
You don’t care about the data. Unless it’s your data the proves you wrong.
Since you are such a lib-boi, let me give you the empiric data you can understand.
When the moon is in the seventh house, and Jupiter aligns with mars the spike proteins come out and threaten humanity. is the intellectual equivalent of your data and your interpretation
It really is the dawning of the age of ignoramus.
Well, I have some very important sciency things to do…and data I can interpret. Which is to say I have to go pick the lint out of my navel as that will to a CI +/- 99.999999999% be more interacting than this conversation has become.
But I enjoyed the opportunity to tweak you a little and you never fail to disappoint with arguments that for what the lack in any logic makes up for in parroted bravado
Dude. Watch football. Take a walk. Sad that on a Sunday you had nothing better than to put together this post. It must be lonely that the ever dwindling number of true believers on your side appear to be sitting on the sidelines and not coming to your defense. Did you lose the community drawing today at the commie compound? Well to each according the their ability which Soledad rather scant over their in antivaxxer land.
Hit me up when you can actually form a cogent argument.
ROFL!
Swishing your skirts to the side is not going to offend me. I’m not a liberal, I don’t base decisions on emotion, and on staying in the popular kids’ club.
Go ahead and waste your ammo trying it. I’ll smirk and keep on going.
And your attempted mockery of me with knowing gobbledegook only shows your impotent rage.
You are wrong in every major thing you’re apparently saying about the jabs.
All the Pfizer money in the world, won’t change that.
I’m sorry you had to watch patients die. But that emotional burden you carry, though it drives you to be a CHAMPION OF SCIENCE AND CLOT-SHOTS!, doesn’t mean a thing.
The science surrounding these clot shots — and the regulatory agencies — and the funding, and the administrative agencies — have all been corrupted by $$$$.
So I’m no longer going to listen to someone shouting “SCIENCE!” at me.
“I posted them for a different reason.”
I retract. What was your reason?
Under the first topic #1 is August 2021. #228 was November 2021.
You said I cherry-picked early reports. If they are in chronological order then there are no up-to-date reports available.
Huh. Maybe you could look at Mewzilla’s list too.
“Huh. Maybe you could look at Mewzilla’s list too.”
I did, See my #28.
To demonstrate, that there was such a thing, as reports of adverse events, in high-quality journals, by people who
a) did not specifically have an axe to grind against the jabs(*)
b) were not trying to sell over-the-counter-products(+)
(*) I think I was the first, or one of the first, to call them the jabs on FR: explicitly in reaction to the psy-op of calling them "vaccinations" in order to try to gain wider acceptance.
(+) Left out of this of course, is the practice early on, of destroying the careers of ANYONE who had anything bad to say a bout the jabs, whatsoever, or who opposed the narrative: the first one I recall specifically was someone out of the University of Northern Virginia, or something like that.
And once you've lost your medical license, you still have to earn a living.
So in mamy cases, it's kind of like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
“To demonstrate, that there was such a thing, as reports of adverse events, in high-quality journals, by people who ... “
It is good to have those reports. Good to also that the reported events were generally mild and the vaccine was essentially safe and effective.
Absence of evidence is not (suffcient to be disposative) evidence of absence.
“Ever notice all those reports are at least two years old?”
I brought that to your attention!
Why didn't you draw the conclusion that perhaps more recent, more comprehensive longitudinal studies might be helpful?
Hint: I've never seen a politician, announcer, newscaster, or the like, have a seizure, or die, on TV, until after the clot shots.
Why doesn't it arouse your suspicions that all the MSM sources of information, all attribute myocarditis, heart attacks, and so forth, to any random factor whatsoever EXCEPT the clot shots?
And why aren't you jumping down THEIR throats for getting the causes wrong, if you are indeed intent on saving lives, and following only peer-reviewed science (unspoken: by people in Pfauci's / Big Pharma's "good graces"):
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/121/497/945/original/d0b7064c81d5b644.jpg
“Why didn’t you draw the conclusion that perhaps more recent, more comprehensive longitudinal studies might be helpful?”
Why didn’t you post more recent articles?
Did you notice
a) I didn't ping any of you $hot $hills
b) I didn't jump up and down spitting wooden nickels that I was going to *PROVE* how bad the jabs are?
“if you are indeed intent on saving lives, and following only peer-reviewed science”
I was following your lead by reviewing the articles you posted.
OK, so now look at the picture I posted, with all the specious causes for heart attacks.
They wouldn’t need to come up with specious causes if there were not more issues with heart problems suddenly appearing, that needed to be explained away.
Where is your self-righteous snippy fault finding about “Kooks” and such for people that say Global Warming is causing heart attacks? Or gardening?
Methinks you doth protest both too much...and too little.
“Methinks you doth protest both too much...and too little.”
I made no protests. All I did was quote from your reading list. I offered no comments or opinions.
If you don’t like what I posted then why did you recommend it?
Brother, I am with you on the ton of information out there that paints this rushed mandated and probably approved for $ only genetic experiment. Unfortunately there are just this small group that wants to hold tightly to their positions. It’s just going to have to be a wait and let the data play out. It was a deadly scam, corruption, abuse of power and ….
The facts will eventually be too much to hide. I think the IGG4 immune response will be their big wake-up. Until then I refuse to argue with idiots. Most are probably old enough the didn’t give up too much of the years left. How they go out may not be pretty but the will not see or admit the issue. Unfortunately that push on the 6 months -39 year olds will have impacts on the countries that pushed this crap. All that foreign DNA in the Vax + the longer living mRNA + the bio activity of the spike is going to cause real issues.
The people still backing the Vax know it wasn’t a sterilizing Vax, it didn’t stop transmission, so their only claim is the pharma companies and the government says it lessons severity of the disease. Irrelevant that the virus mutated to less severe form.
Fight with pigs but unfortunately they enjoy it and we just get muddy. They won’t change their minds based on any data. It’s peer reviewed, well the say not good enough ….
They are just too far down the rabbit hole.
Good luck.
Some of them have their entire self-worth and career invested in it;
Some are cowards, scared of being called "unscientific" or "science-deniers";
Some are scared of having their professional licenses revoked;
Some are traumatized by patient care early on;
Some are just NPCs.
But it's fun for me to deflate their balloons.
And to give those of good will, confidence to push back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.