Posted on 11/19/2023 10:45:52 AM PST by grey_whiskers
Myocarditis Thrombosis Thrombocytopenia Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Vasculitis Guillain-Barré Syndrome Lymphadenopathy Anaphylaxis Myopericarditis Allergic Reactions Bell’s Palsy Axillary Adenopathy Pericarditis Acute Myelitis Perimyocarditis Intracerebral Haemorrhage Immune-Mediated Hepatitis Facial Nerve Palsy Neurological Symptoms Haemorrhage Immune-Mediated Disease Outbreaks Takotsubo cardiomyopathy Cardiac Rhabdomyolysis Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Cardiovascular events Acute Hyperactive Encephalopathy Acute Kidney Injury Multiple Sclerosis Bleeding Episodes Cutaneous Adverse Effects Skin Reactions Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome Capillary Leak Syndrome Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Petechiae Purpura Annularis Telangiectodes Pulmonary Embolism Psoriasis Nephrotic Syndrome Bullous Drug Eruption Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Pulmonary Embolism Blood Clots Thrombophilia iTTP episode Refractory Status Epilepticus Central Serous Retinopathy Cutaneous Reactions Prion Disease Pregnant Woman Process-Related Impurities CNS Inflammation CNS Demyelination Orofacial Brain Haemorrhage Varicella Zoster Virus Nerve And Muscle Adverse Events Oculomotor Paralysis Parsonage-Turner Syndrome Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy Lipschütz ulcers (Vaginal ulcers) Amyotrophic Neuralgia Polyarthralgia Thyroiditis Keratolysis (Corneal Melting) Arthritis Thymic hyperplasia Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome Hailey-Hailey Disease Acute Lympholysis Interstitial Lung Disease Vesiculobullous Cutaneous Reactions Hematologic Conditions Hemolysis Headache Acute Coronary Syndrome ANCA Glomerulonephritis Neurologic Phantosmia Uveitis Pathophysiologic Alterations Inflammatory Myositis Still’s Disease Pityriasis Rosea Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Sweet’s Syndrome Sensorineural Hearing Loss Serious Adverse Events Among Health Care Professionals Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Ocular Adverse Events Depression Pancreas Allograft Rejection Acute Hemichorea-Hemibalismus Alopecia Areata Graves’ Disease Cardiovascular Events Metabolic Syndrome Eosinophilic Dermatosis Hypercoagulability Neuroimaging Findings in Post COVID-19 Vaccination Urticaria Central Vein Occlusion Thrombophlebitis Squamous Cell Carcinoma Chest Pain Acute Inflammatory Neuropathies Brain Death Kounis Syndrome Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma Gastroparesis Asthma Safety Monitoring of the Janssen Vaccine Myocardial Injury Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Neurological Autoimmune Diseases V-REPP Herpes Simplex Virus Related Material
So far, six of the first six papers in the OP article recommend the vax:
—————Paper #6———————
” Importantly, analyses of this data and their discussion by North American and European health agencies at this early stage conclude that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks in all populations, including the rare risk of myocarditis, for all recommended age groups.”
“He was quoting from the summary sections; not from the hard science.”
I quoted their conclusions based on their review of their hard science.
(clears throat)
Hearken to us,
exDemMom
PhD of Great Aplomb!
Hearken to us,
Come to us,
Be our Defense
Hearken to us,
from those who would
sell Supplements!
Reveal the Secrets
of Science to us
By the Power
Of Calculus™!
For we know
that none is wiser
than a whore
who shills for Pfizer!
Hearken to us,
exDemMom
PhD of Great Aplomb!
One purpose of linking to a massive number of papers claiming that they all “prove” something is to overwhelm anyone trying to get at the truth.
Uh huh.
I posted this list in contravention of your fatuous claim that
Do you know why professional antivaxxers rarely link or provide valid citations to articles? It's because they DO NOT want anyone to read those articles. I assume you refuse to post the links for the same reason. They especially don't want anyone who understands the articles coming back and revealing how they lied about the content of those articles!
So, now that the cat is out of the bag, and you've been proven to be lying through your teeth,
you double down AND move the goalposts in this thread:
A debunker of antivax claims really only needs to show that the professional antivax propagandist lied about one paper. Because if they lied about one paper, chances are very high they lied about all of the papers.
However, like you stated here,
"I notice that the twitter post only linked to that website, but not to any supposed proof of anything. The failure to provide a link to the actual article is, of course, a huge red flag. Professional antivaxxers *never* want anyone to fact-check. "
So now you're lying about the entire SERIES, as well as those posting them.
Incidentally, mewzilla posted another list on this thread, apparently most-recent to oldest.
It's funny how both you and the other trolls are
a) dismissing the entire list while having a fit of the vapors
or
b) Cherry picking a couple quotes from the earliest papers, ignoring the implications that clicically detectable cardiomyopathy was being picked up IN CHILDERN (statistically zero risk of death from the coof, so no need for the clot shots) after only a few days.
So that proves, by your own rule, that you're probably lying about all the rest of your assertions.
Your fellow troll also proved you a liar when he posted a cherry-picked quote from an early paper upthread,
The authors seek not to frustrate vaccination efforts, but rather to prepare patients and providers for a rare but potential adverse effect. Furthermore, the authors hope the dramatic improvement in all four patients will reassure those who do suffer from myocarditis following vaccination.
Contradicting now and forever, your claim that anti-vaxxers are just trying to promote their own alternative quack products -- for example, your probably legally actionable claim against your (claimed) mentor Dr. Malone,
that
He also has a personal website where he promotes a scientifically unsupported and highly questionable Covid treatment protocol and sells "supplements" which he promises will rid your body of spike protein remaining from infection or vaccines. (No scientific evidence for this, of course. Proteases in your body destroy spike protein.)
BTW, you never did respond to my peer review article showing that nattokinase chews up spike protein in vitro The paper was published in Japan, outside of Pfauci's reach.
Let's see if your world-class acess to medical journals can help you find it.
Oh, wait, almost forgot.
CALCULUS!
Dingbat.
There are 228 papers which discuss myocarditis.
And you forgot to discuss the implications of myocarditis being found in children, within a few days of the shots, in a small sample
since
a) children generally don't get myocarditis
b) children have statistically basically zero risk of dying from COVID-1984.
Troll.
Oh, congrats. You were finally honest about something.
Based on the track record of your fellow trolls, I am not hopeful that this represents any kind of a trend.
“Troll.”
Just posting from YOUR list of articles. You should be glad I am helping you to propagate your recommended reading.
It’s not at all unusual to find papers with statements in the abstract that completely contradict the data in the article. Papers are written to please the person writing the checks.
Paper #7:
ASSESSING THE RISKS
Despite these rare occurrences of myocarditis, the benefit-risk assessment of COVID-19 vaccination shows a favorable balance for all age and sex groups.
a) didn't have an exe to grind
b) weren't trying to sell OTC products in lieu of the clot shots
which showed that
a) there were clinically detectable adverse events including myocarditis
within DAYS of the clot shots
b) even for a small sample size c)even among children, who don't regularly suffer myocarditis in comparison to other groups
d) and (being children) are basically at ZERO risk of death from COVID, so why give them the clot shots at all?
“It’s not at all unusual to find papers with statements in the abstract that completely contradict the data in the article.”
Nope. And I didn’t post from the abstracts.
Who cares? “Scientists,” just like a lot of people, can be bought.
Pharma salespeople are among the most annoying, slimy people there are.
“Nope, you’re missing the point, “
How am I missing the point? I am simply quoting from your reading list.
By dodging the points raised on post #49.
Troll.
“Who cares? “Scientists,” just like a lot of people, can be bought.
Pharma salespeople are among the most annoying, slimy people there are.”
The OP cares. He posted them as evidence no one should get the shot.
In the publications I have made I have never once been charged nor has the submitting institution. But the case majority of those article have editorial boards who are not peers, I analyzed one earlier this year and the degrees were not only nor clinical but not scienctific. One of them had a community organizer social worker as assoc editor in chief.
Looking at the sources it is laughable. But i acquiesce to the point that some respected journals may make an administrative fee to submit, but it likely does not guarantee publication as many of the so called open source on line journals promise.
With all due respect, I have read almost every article you have presented over the last few years and they are crap. Also the “summary” or in science language the “abstract” details the findings of the publication and is standard in every scientific paper. Apparently even the pseudo-scientific garbage you presented herein.
On last little favor. Can you pick another insult beside troll. Vary it up a little. I would hate to think you are capable of only monosyllabic insults. Surely you can be more creative than that.
Nope.
I posted them for a different reason.
But you keep trolling even where you weren’t pinged.
Of course you forget that a large prospective study as to myocarditis concluded “in the rare event that a patient has myocarditis, it is brief and self limited with no long term sequelae.”
Every vaccination induces an inflammatory response and has the risk of myocarditis. The risk here is equivalent to other vaccination and is essentially zero.
However, comrade, I see you have perfected that of your leader. “One death is tragic, a million is a statistic”. Before you salivate like pavlova dog over that or bears to mention there haven’t been a million deaths around the vaccine. (Unless like you, every death since 2020 must just be related to the vaccine even if the decedent didn’t get the immunization). Of course you also believe that a vaccinated person can spread the spike proteins by just appearing in public.
Tell ya what. Go by three more bottles of snake oil from Malones website. You’ll be fine with the invisible armor (for only $99.99. But wait, there is more. Buy now and we will send you two sham wows for the price of one — I mine spike protein cleansers)
Now THAT is a master level troll.
Wiih all due respect, you don’t deserve respect; because you are lying.
Here are some of the different journals from the list at the top of this thread...
American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice
Volume 8, August 2021, 100042 (Elsevier)
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601
https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2021/06/04/peds.2021-052478
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Volume 37, Issue 10, October 2021, Pages 1629-1634
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 30, Issue 10, October 2021, Pages 1425-1429
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135.
https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2021/08/12/peds.2021-053427.full.pdf
JAMA, Circulation, Pediatrics, NEJM
You’re right. They’re all birdcage liner.
Your flop sweat is showing.
Troll.
8/259 all of which say the benefits outweigh the risks. Your problem is failing to understand that data are not emotional. You are an emotional wreck when someone points it out
Rush Limbaugh was referred to as a troll. Happy to be in his company.
You are Lib-boi. All emotion. No reasoned thought.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.