Don't let anyone gaslight you on VAERS (The CDC's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System)

substack.com ^ | May 3, 2023 | Steve Kirsch

[ransomnote]

The data in VAERS can be used to prove the vaccines are killing people. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Here's how to respond to all their arguments and turn the tables on them.

Steve Kirsch

May 3, 2023

 

 

Figure 1. Death reports in VAERS. Can you spot the unsafe vaccine? If you can’t, you can get a job as a “fact checker” for any mainstream media. Or a job in safety monitoring at the CDC! Despite what the CDC wants you to believe, the higher red bars are not due to social media hype, more doses, or different reporting requirements. I can’t get anyone on the record to explain the cause of this.

Executive summary

The single most devastating piece of evidence showing that the COVID vaccines have killed hundreds of thousands of Americans is the data in the VAERS system. Why? Because it’s the ground zero reporting system for adverse events for vaccines in the US.

This is why fact checkers are so diligent in attacking any articles that use the VAERS data to make a claim that is counter-narrative.

In this article, I will arm you with the tools you need to debunk the fact checkers and turn the tables on them so they are caught in their lies.

They will claim this is just over-reporting of “background events” caused by a rule change and social media exposure in combination with more people getting vaccinated and a shift to older people who are more likely to die.

It sounds plausible, but they never provide the math to “check” that their explanation can explain the data. The key word is NEVER.

They basically hope that everyone buys the hand-waving argument and nobody actually checks the math.

While all of those statements are true, you have to show causality. For example, just because there is a rule change doesn’t mean that anyone notices it and actually changes their behavior to produce a different outcome. Can you name a single hospital which instructed doctors on the new VAERS rules and required them to report all the new incidents?

So basically, debunking these “fact checkers” is as simple as calling their bluff and asking to see the evidence for their claims and asking them to explain other observations that are easily verifiable that are inconsistent with their hypothesis.

Keep in mind that you cannot have it both ways. There is only one truth here. The correct hypothesis is the hypothesis which is a better fit to all the available evidence from all sources.

MORE AT LINK: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/dont-let-anyone-gaslight-you-on-vaers

 

[ransomnote]

The CDC/FDA were never happy to have VAERS foisted on them by Congress. Although the original mandate requires all healthcare providers to report potential vaccine injuries to VAERS, in today's Covid political climate, there are reports from medical staff who say they punished/threatened or fired for reporting Covid 'vaccine' harm.

VAERS was mandated by Congress in 1986, which required healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers to report vaccine adverse events (VAEs).

https://nitaac.nih.gov/resources/articles/project-summaries/vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system

So the CDC/FDA created a buggy, hard to use software platform for passive reporting (either patient, doctor or other can file a report). It seems 'too many' people were exposing 'too much' about vaccine harm because why else would someone bother to file a conspicuously fake report, which the CDC/FDA then used to 'justify' making all VAERS reports pass through the CDC so that the CDC can determin which reports to file, or not? 

The CDC gives itself 6 weeks to review reports received, however at the Covid 'vaccine' rollout, the CDC held back or didn't report large quantities of data, and then slowly trickled in data from the start of the Covid 'vaccine' administration, instead of trying to work on current data. This had the effect of concealing the true picture of vaccine harm re Covid 'vaccines.' I have posted threads about the researcher tracking the reports of death and other serious adverse events following Covid 'vaccination' which the CDC deleted from the database.

Given the CDC says they have 6 weeks to review reports received, you'd think they'd catch the reports which fail to note WHICH VACCINE the report is for, what year the report was filed, the age of the patient etc. When I sort and review data in VAERS, I see a significant number of reports which are flagged 'Unknown' due to missing data, or impossible filing dates for Covid 'vaccine' reports (e.g., 1980) etc.

The VAERS database is intentionally hard to use for those wishing to file a report. There are numerous fields to fill out, and the program logs the user out without warning at the 20 minute mark, forcing them to start the entire process all over. There are many poor features that the tax-payer-money rich CDC could have repaired if they actually wanted VAERS to be used by the public. Search results often drop records for arcane reasons. There is a silly limit to the number of reports viewed at any given time on the CDC's VAERS platform.

Other platforms try to address usability failures by picking up VAERS data exports and displaying them on user friendly websites. Here are two good alternatives:

Openvaers.com

Medalerts.org

More than a decade ago, researchers determined that about 1% of all actual adverse events experienced following vaccination were reported to the CDC. But Covid is highly violatile with unprecedented censorship and retaliation against healthcare providers in the news.

When Covid 'vaccines' were released, the CDC rolled out an entirely different phone application which fed user reports of adverse events to a private database which only the CDC staff could view. There's no excuse for this concealment - they could have simply updated and improved VAERS user interface, and made a convenient phone app to report to VAERS. There are actually 12 separate databases which feed VAERS data - and there's 2 lawsuits out there regarding CMS (Medicare database) which was intended to feed Covid 'vaccine' data to VAERS, but which two separate whistleblowers claimed retained about 45,000 records of death following Covid 'vaccination' which was never uploaded to VAERS.

 VAERS under reports and discourages public use by design.

[ransomnote]

PING

[equaviator]

Gaslighting? LOL...Bring it on! Attempts to “gaslight” on me don’t get too far because I assume they’re being launched from a weak or “threatened” position, which they usually are. Don’t let the smooth taste fool ya!

[AndyTheBear]

I note the blue regular vaccine bar does not explode in size but stays about where its always been . Only the all vaccines bar does. So much for it simply being due to changes in reporting behavior.

[Deaf Smith]

I have been following VAERS since April 2021 and the increasing rate of “vaccine” deaths up to early June of that year when the CDC discovered where the increased traffic to their website was going to…VAERS.

VAERS was shut down to the public for about 5-6 weeks beginning in June 2021.

When VAERS reopened to the public, reported deaths was stagnant for July to August with much slower reporting of deaths prior to the June shut down.

The CDC stated they were vetting all reported deaths to where reported deaths again went stagnant once they reached the 30k threshold.

[JimRed]

Mortality is one thing. But how many of the vaxxed have had debilitating but less-than-fatal outcomes?

Mrs. JimRed is an example. Within ten days after her third COVID shot she showed symptoms of Parkinson’s and dementia. The meds seem to be holding it at bay but not improving it.
Her short-term memory is worsening and confusion comes more requently.

[AndyTheBear]

I recall seeing the B.S. CDC disclaimers but had forgotten about the pause in collecting data. The total extent of the jab deaths certainly can't be judged by the data from a self reporting system, but two things were obvious from early on:

1) The jab was orders of magnitude more dangerous to life and health than flu shots.

2) The CDC was aware of this and actively trying to deceive the public about it.

[AndyTheBear]

Mortality is one thing. But how many of the vaxxed have had debilitating but less-than-fatal outcomes?

Probably a whole heck of a lot, however counting the deaths makes a stronger argument because its always pretty easy to determine an alive person from a dead person, thus the CDC can't argue BS like: "Oh well they probably only *felt* their condition was worse because of the bad press the poor vaccines[sic] got".

[ransomnote]

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Don't let anyone gaslight you on VAERS (The CDC's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System), JimRed wrote:

Mortality is one thing. But how many of the vaxxed have had debilitating but less-than-fatal outcomes?

Mrs. JimRed is an example. Within ten days after her third COVID shot she showed symptoms of Parkinson’s and dementia. The meds seem to be holding it at bay but not improving it.
Her short-term memory is worsening and confusion comes more requently.

That's the sad part - we end up debating deaths but there are massive numbers of persons disabled or with lower quality of life as a result of the vax. Their stories are crushing but largely ignored. :(