Posted on 01/27/2023 9:02:17 AM PST by EBH
The unvaccinated knew what we didn't. Some of them said too little. Most said nothing at all. A lot of blood is now on their hands.
As the world struggles to come to terms with the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, one question that continues to surface is why the unvaccinated didn't do more to warn us about the potential dangers of being injected.
While well intending citizens lined up, did the right thing, and received their COVID19 vaccinations -- now seeming to do more harm than good -- their unvaccinated friends stood by and let them do it. Some of them said too little. Some said nothing at all.
Even though they knew what we didn't.
Our blood is now on their hands.
Those are strong words. But the unvaccinated had access to important information about the potential side effects of vaccines. They knew about the risks of severe allergic reactions, blood clots, and other serious health complications. They knew that vaccines did not immunize us. They knew it wasn't effective, and that they can cause more harm than good.
They knew all of that, but instead of warning us, the unvaccinated chose to remain silent. They chose to look the other way and not speak out about the potential dangers of vaccines. They let millions of good folks who did the right thing (at the time) fall to death and disease, and many antivaxxers even gloated online about how their coin flip had been the right bet. The more diabolical even urged folks they disagree with to "get boosted."
It has become all too clear. The silence of the unvaccinated was a dangerous, sociopathic, and irresponsible decision that has had serious consequences for those of us who received the vaccinations.
And silence is, after all, consent.
It is time for the unvaccinated to take responsibility for their actions and to work with the rest of us to find a solution to this crisis. We cannot afford to let their selfishness and lack of action continue to harm our communities. It is time for the unvaccinated to step up and do the right thing.
The unvaccinated should by any moral measuring stick have done more to warn about the potential risks -- to help us make informed decisions about our health. And they must now ask us for our forgiveness. And, hand to heart, we may just give it to them.
Because we are good people. We took those injections because it was the right thing to do -- until it wasn't.
This headline got me at first. Then, I woke up and realized that the Vaxxed would get and know about side effects. All the unvaxxed would have is secondhand possibly unreliable info. I read it was supposed to be satire.
Wife got vax with no effects. I have read too much about people with effects and chose not to get it. Wife and I both got a mild cold a few weeks ago. She got a positive for Covid on a couple home tests. We had were plugged sinuses and a cough that went away after a few days. I know know some people get it worse, and I am not trying to belittle how bad it was for them.
I can actually claim to have assisted in talking a close family friend out of getting jabbed.
This satirical piece is funny as hell. Worth posting again to see heads explode.
B.S. on three counts: 1) "Anti-Vaxxers" tried to raise the warning but were shouted down as "anti-science," and for wanting to "kill grandma."
2) social media such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube actively blocked such messages from getting out, and banned anybody trying to make such messages.
And finally, 3) The MSM refused to even consider the possibility that these experimental vaccinations could be harmful, thus also suppressed any anti-vax ideas and opinions.
You people are making excuses for your own actions and casting the blame on others.
Quarantine definition;
From Seafaring days
A ship with a sick crew would be
Isolated 40 days.
.
That was Our SCIENCE Untill WUHAN.
Good satire for Rizzel
It’s really stirring the Pot!
this is satire isn’t it?.....
Alex, I’ll take “Because they were too busy building nuclear fallout shelters.” for $200!
Thumbs 👍 and You Win !
.
I’ve been following this
For three days as I’m snowed in
And if I fall asleep the Dogs will
Eat Me !¡!
.
Excuse me the chihuahua is
Giving me the Eye.
You Go YOYO!
What am I supposed to warn people about, if you want it, get it, if you don’t, then don’t, as far as the politics, I already vote correctly.
Thanks.
Is it?
Hard to tell...
Even AP is posting fact-checks on it...LOL
Fact Check-Fake headline from The Conversation asks why the unvaccinated didn't ‘warn’ the vaccinated, January 23, 2023.
"The circulated screenshot is dated June 6, 2023, five months in the future at the time of this writing." "Examples of the screenshot can be viewed (here), (here)."Note the dates on the tweet and screenshot. The Tweet is from January 23, 2023, the screenshot says June 6, 2023.
There's this on IQfy.com from wonkette: Fake 'Woke' Site Dupes Conservatives Desperate To Prove The Left Has Lost It June 06, 2022 10:55 AM.
For years, a hallmark of right-wing disinformation has been a tactic I like to call "trollception." Hoaxers come up with an imaginary new thing to say "SJWs" or "woke" people believe, then they get outraged about the imaginary thing that is not actually happening. We've seen it before with 4chan campaigns like #EndFathersDay, where users of the site created a bunch of fake Twitter profiles, mostly of Black women, and pretended they were trying to cancel Father's Day for feminism, because of how all men are evil.
OK, that's a left wing view of iqfy.com. What's there to back it up? The article from The Conversation: COVID: unvaccinated people may be seen as ‘free riders’ and face discrimination, which was used to create the fake screen shot above.Site and articles like this are not sarcasm or comedy. They are clickbait scams and articles like this pretending to be serious are the same as faking hate crimes. They make conservatives look bad for falling for it and validate what progressives want to think of us.
Maybe IQfy.com needs the same treatment as Zerohedge and not welcome here?
And if you went to the actual article on IQfy.com, you would have noticed that there is no date on it. Not June 2023 or even January 2023. There is no author listed either. So who published it first?
I am so sorry for your loss. I had a good friend and neighbor who came down with explosive cancer and died a few weeks after getting his first Covid shot. His wife is a nurse and hospital administrator and insisted that he be vaccinated. She of course makes no connection between him seeming to be perfectly healthy up until he was vaccinated and then coming down with cancer basically in every organ at the same time.
This is such BS from top to bottom. Many of us were forced to get these vaccines by our work due to continued harping by Fauci, Birx, Wallensky and the rest of the tyrannical Pharma pushing the dangers in every way possible. I need to work and my wife pushed me hard to get them even though I didn’t want them. No my employer says very little about boosters. I told them right up front I wouldn’t be getting any boosters.
And I still hear ads on radio and tv pushing boosters today. Disgusting.
The Conversation article has its publication date on the page, and in the page source code there is "pubdate" "20230106". The IQfy page code has "article:published_time" of "2023-01-23".
The Conversation article was published January 6. Then the IQfy was published two weeks later on January 23, the same day as the tweets with the fake screenshots attributing it to The Conversation. Most of the comments on IQfy are likely paid fake comments to give the appearance of going viral.
Sites like this are not anti-vaccine, conspiracy, or one side of a issue creating fakes to discredit the other. This is outrage bait, click bait for ad revenue, and plagiarism.
Thank you for your condolences. I’ve heard of a few more similar stories. . .”just anecdotal” of course and therefore meaningless to the self-proclaimed experts. Please keep fighting the good fight, there may be others out there who can be protected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
