A far left wing wealthy author discovers she is an useful idiot.
I didn’t realize that the tweet to which JK Rowling replied wasn’t copied. It said, “I’m more of a woman than JK Rowling will ever be.” Utter BS.
Meanwhile, check out what the SNP has been up to...
btt
Regardless of pathetic leftist narratives, none of us are compelled to participate in radical leftist delusions. They are to be discarded as so much execrable filth, which is an utterly appropriate description for the left.
HAHA, that’s pretty good!
After never having considered myself a feminist at all in any way, I do now consider myself a TERF. In fact, I’m ready to buy a t-shirt!
Rowling is very brave. And she has plainly said that she’s standing up in part on behalf of other who don’t have the resources to resist that she does.
What is twitter? Does it have anything related to bird hunting?
They are trying to reduce a Woman to just a feeling.
I hate this Twitter nonsense.
Can’t anyone use quotation marks, at least? Maybe some indentation? Good God.
Your post is confusing to me.
Are you saying YOU support TERF?
Are you saying that YOU support TERF and J.K. Rowling?
Are you saying that J.K. Rowling supports TERF?
The use of quotes around only TERF makes it impossible to figure out your intent. Adding to my confusion is the fact that I had no idea what TERF meant. So I looked it up.
“The term ‘TERF’ is an acronym meaning Transgender Exclusionary Radical Feminist, and it was initially coined by a feminist blogger named Viv Smythe around 2008. Smythe used the phrase to describe a subgroup of radical feminists that didn’t view trans women’s rights equally to the rest of women’s rights in the feminist movement.”
So, breaking it down, if Rowling said she supports TERF, it simply, means she supports the idea that a subgroup of “radical feminists” profess...that transwomen aren’t women. It does not necessarily mean that she IS a TERF.
But I still have no idea is you are supporting Rowling or claiming that you support her for supporting TERF.
And just so it’s clear I’m not trying to trap you or something, I’ll say up front that, based on the above, I support Rowling for believing that trans women aren’t women, or at least believes that trans women’s rights aren’t equal to the rest of women’s rights.
Honestly, what are the two words? This article doesn’t seem to list them or isn’t very clear to me what they are. I would expect to see the two words with quotations around them.
What are the ‘two words’?
There is one sure fire method for identifying males and females... It’s called DNA. If you have a ‘Y’ chromosome you are a male... If you don’t... You are a female. Problem solved.
Who writes the incomprehensible garbage? Just tell us the “two words.”
She’s a lefty but has never backed down on her beliefs. They’ve been trying for a few years now to cancel her, but to no avail.
I find these twitter threads impossible to interpret..What were her two words?
For most of my life, I really didn't care if men liked to play dress up and pretend to be women. Or vice versa, but women trying to be men looks even dumber in my opinion. But to each their own.
But these people now claiming that they can have mentrual periods and get pregnant is a bridge too far for me. I cannot take anybody seriously that spouts that nonsense.
They can never be real women and it's time society started putting these transsexuals back in their places.
The comeback is an overused trope on the childish level of “I know you are, but what am I?”. It can be used in about any situation where one disagrees and a cheap “ mic drop” moment...whether the disagreement is valid or not. And yet, the thing she was responding to was so stupid I guess a cheap response was somehow appropriate. However the response was not worthy of the articles hype.