Posted on 11/30/2022 4:59:32 AM PST by MtnClimber
"The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES."
—Question of Law in the Supreme Court case known as Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)
They Broke Their Oaths
Loy, Raland, Deron, and Gaynor Brunson all witnessed what they believed to be the theft of the 2020 election and decided to file suit. However, the interesting approach that they have taken is not to make a formal complaint that the election was stolen; instead, they have chosen to sue members of the U.S. Congress who voted not to investigate whether any election irregularities may have occurred that could have affected the outcome. In other words, the Brunson Brothers were motivated to sue because these elected officials broke their oaths to protect the Constitution of the United States.
The Brunson Brothers believed that, to support and defend the Constitution, an investigation into possible fraud needed to take place. Otherwise, how could anyone know with certainty whether the election had been secure?
What shocked the Brunson Brothers was that only 147 members of the US Congress voted in support
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I wonder if the penalty could be tar and feathers.
Bkmk
I am still trying to follow the logic, but the answer to the headline query in any case is going to be a resounding no.
The swamp will not drain the swamp by otself any more than fish in an aquarium will decide to all pee in the same corner so they won’t have to swim around in and breathe each other’s filth. Even if they do, the exercise is pointless.
The supreme court lost all legitimacy when it refused to hear the valid complaints of Texas and other states when they were protesting the 2020 election. They said the state had no standing, what a crock.
Is this the case?
No.
Tracy Beanz lays out the facts why:
https://t.me/TracybeanzOfficial/4113
I wish it were different. Likely, this case will not be heard. For the rest of us, it’s Hopium.
But there is a case which has legs and leverage:
Missouri et al v. FJB
https://t.me/TracybeanzOfficial/4124?single
And what is the relief requested? Re-do of 2020? Removal of Congress critters? Not going to happen (even though we all know it should happen in a just society), but I applaud the plaintiff’s for bringing it this far.
Fighting back isn’t pointless. We’re probing their perimeter.
Read the logic again, it’s pretty solid.
If the Federal courts were to recognize the legitimacy of a state to file a suit like this, then the courts would inevitable be required to establish a uniform national standard for presidential elections. This is a direct contradiction of Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. And I would also point out that any “uniform national standard” for elections would have the loosest controls in place right now — like ballot harvesting, mail-in ballots collected for weeks, minimal registration requirements, etc.
Oaths of office are not legally binding. If they were, more than half of the FedGov would be out of office and/or in jail.
Aye...therein lies the rub. The escape clause if you will. The Supremes will say, there may have been 'irregularities', but affected the outcome? To that they'll say 'no'.
This case is cr@p. None of these guys are lawyers. All they did was send it to the court, who sent it back for format issues, then logged it in as “docketed”. There is no way the court will hear this.
Tar and feathering would not be a strong enough message. The French Revolutionists had a better and farther reaching method of sending a crystal clear message to the political class and their enforcers that tyranny, for ANY reason, is not acceptable. It involved baskets and a lot of lost heads. Just wondering if that could work here. Just spitballin’.
The odds that the Supreme Court will grant this crackpot pro se cart petition are zero.
Thanks for those links to Tracy Beanz.
For those FRs here that have not gone there, it is a series of about 10 short (1-2min) audio clips of Tracy giving her view that the Bruson SC case is going nowhere. And, for each, a handful of varied responses.
I found her arguments interesting, but I believe she is missing a bigger picture. There was one poignant reply to one of the clips that captured things well... we are already under some form of military situation. Note DJT’s ‘farewell’ EO’s, and lots of activity *after* 11/3, in the month of Dec 20 and Jan 21 in devolution activities (See Patel Patriot).
I’ll conjecture that perhaps this case either HAS to be denied, OR, it HAS to get cert and then rejected by SCOTUS, or perhaps even that it HAS to get cert and ruled in favor by SCOTUS, in order to trigger the next events.
Recognize that ALL government systems have failed. Whether SCOTUS succeeds here or fails nary matters - it’s failure, if that is what happens, is just another nail in the coffin. If the military takes action against this foreign power that holds the USA currently, it will only do so after every last vestige of saving us is exhausted, and then perhaps only after every last vestige of saving is is exhausted TWICE - ie, 2020 elections and now 2022 elections.
DC is occupied territory.
They got carried away in the French Revolution. we don’t want that here.
Tar and feathers would do the job adequately. Start locally.
And yet, how would they know unless it’s investigated? That ought to be the response if they say that.
Yes, Washington DC is a captured operation. Congress will not save us, the DOJ will not save us, the courts will not save us. The military is the only way forward.
But, as you know, this Nation hasn't been running smoothly on all cylinders for some time. The Swamp has tendrils into even the SC.
It will be interesting to watch this case.
Agreed, with the caveat that they will proceed very carefully, but forcefully. As DJT has said, move silently and with forethought, and then.... POUNCE, like the fastest animal on earth.
drip... drip.... drip.. FLOOD!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.