Thanks for those links to Tracy Beanz.
For those FRs here that have not gone there, it is a series of about 10 short (1-2min) audio clips of Tracy giving her view that the Bruson SC case is going nowhere. And, for each, a handful of varied responses.
I found her arguments interesting, but I believe she is missing a bigger picture. There was one poignant reply to one of the clips that captured things well... we are already under some form of military situation. Note DJT’s ‘farewell’ EO’s, and lots of activity *after* 11/3, in the month of Dec 20 and Jan 21 in devolution activities (See Patel Patriot).
I’ll conjecture that perhaps this case either HAS to be denied, OR, it HAS to get cert and then rejected by SCOTUS, or perhaps even that it HAS to get cert and ruled in favor by SCOTUS, in order to trigger the next events.
Recognize that ALL government systems have failed. Whether SCOTUS succeeds here or fails nary matters - it’s failure, if that is what happens, is just another nail in the coffin. If the military takes action against this foreign power that holds the USA currently, it will only do so after every last vestige of saving us is exhausted, and then perhaps only after every last vestige of saving is is exhausted TWICE - ie, 2020 elections and now 2022 elections.
DC is occupied territory.
Yes, Washington DC is a captured operation. Congress will not save us, the DOJ will not save us, the courts will not save us. The military is the only way forward.
It will be summarily denied without opinion.
The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to remove members of Congress—that power is vested by the Constitution exclusively in the respective houses of Congress themselves. And even if it had jurisdiction, the Speech and Debate Clause would prohibit the court from punishment members of Congress for actions they took or failed to take there.