Posted on 10/06/2022 10:54:40 AM PDT by MNDude
Everyone knows about the destruction of the NORD streamline. If it is proved that Russia destroyed it, causing harm to Germany, then a joint NATO action against Russia is likely to be expected.
However, what if the people of Germany go through the most difficult winter in recent years. Endless stories of German people burning furniture to stay warm. Then, indisputable evidence that the Biden administration was responsible is revealed. What then?
Would that be the end of NATO? Would USA just get a scolding from European leaders? Would USA be considered the attacker the treated was intended to defend from?
My guess is the European NATO leaders are too addicted the the US dollar gravy train that NATO gives them, and nothing much would come of it.
Your thoughts?
The future would be one of vast cover up.
Now way this information is allowed to be “validated” in any western media, and all western governments will deny it.
And label it Russian disinformation.
Nothing publicly.
Behind the scenes, NATO would start getting the Big Guy’s 10%.
Let me answer it this way.
Does Russia send billions to prop up the defense of Europe?
Does Russia allow European companies to decimate their industries while helping theirs?
Follow the money
It used to be that the purpose of the government of The United States was to serve the people of The United States.
This is no longer the case.
The purpose of the government of The United States these days is to enrich certain government officials and government employees.
This means that the Biden Administration makes foreign policy decisions based on the economic benefits that they and the Democrat party will receive.
Said a rrretard Bidenista.
“And label it Russian disinformation.”
Agreed and as they are already doing.
Prison for all involved. Unfortunately they will remove those documents from the Whitehouse and hide them as classified in Valerie Jarretts basement and the DOJ will have no interest in them whatsoever.
Nobody is going to prove anyone did it, because nobody wants to prove who did it, because nobody wants to have the logical consequences that would follow if we knew who did it.
It’s just one of those situations where everyone will point the finger, and in the end nobody will actually do anything.
If they had a laptop exchange between hunter and jo..admitting jo was responsible...Jo would like and say he had nothing to do with it.
Everyone would know he did..but nothing would be done about it.
And years from now the media would repeat the lie.
The best case is made by Clarice Feldman in sunday’s Pieces.
Europe wouldn’t do it to themselves with winter coming, nor would Biden dump on them without prior consultation.
Putin needs the money to replenish his troops.
Russia has had myriad maintenance issues with the pipeline for several years. They make cheap repairs, and fake repairs. Mostly likely its simple incompetence.
There is the possibility that some terrorist org. hoping for world-wide chaos is responsible, but I go with sloppy, graft incompetence.
>>K.T.MacFarland laid out a good case against Russia. She is convinced Putin was behind the pipeline sabotage.
Honest question: What would Putins motivation be? All he had to do was not pump into the pipeline right? What additional benefit would there be by destroying it?
When this is all over - presumably he would still want to be able to sell/send as much gas as he wanted to.
If they had a laptop exchange between hunter and jo..admitting jo was responsible...Jo would LIE and say he had nothing to do with it.
Everyone would know he did IT..but nothing would be done about it.
And years from now the media would repeat the lie.
EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW THE TRUTH.
That’s why it will never be allowed to “be proven” (at least not in this current era)
Maybe in 20 years, when people and circumstances are different.
No, we would have used Ukrainians.
What if it was a coordinated effort by a group of globalists to achieve a certain goal?
> Nobody is going to prove anyone did it, because nobody wants to prove who did it... <
That’s probably the best answer of all. I recently read an article where the author argued that the pipeline was probably destroyed because of poor Russian maintenance procedures. Let’s for a moment assume that’s true.
How could the West prove that conclusively? They can’t. And Russia would never admit to such incompetence. So file this one away with “What happened to Jimmy Hoffa?”
“Would that be the end of NATO?”
We can only hope that is the case.
What we have now is a struggle for wealth between the Biden Administration and the Putin Administration.
The use of the tools of the government of The United States (military, State Dept, etc…) are being brandished against the Putin Administration.
The benefits of this foreign policy go to the Biden Administration instead of to the people of The United States.
Part of these benefits go to the Biden Administration and the rest are forwarded to the families that serve as go-betweens between the Biden Administration and nations hostile to The United States.
These families are: Soros, Clintons, Obamas, Bidens.
They take their cut of the benefits and then forward the rest to nations hostile to The United States such as China and Iran.
Reminds me of JFK’s sexual escapades.
If you raised such allegations in the 1960’s-1980’s, you would have been destroyed by media, and government. The Kennedys were still a force, and people around him were still in power, and benefitted from JFK/RFK/the family
Now in 2022, it doesn’t matter - even leftist-shill media like NPR will dig into JFK’s dangerous and myriad sexual scandals, even accusations of rape, and no one says anything.
Like many other historical events (Kennedy assassination, Hoffa burial place, etc.) it will remain a mystery forever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.