Skip to comments.
How would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?[video]
youtube ^
| Jun 27, 2022
| Modern Muscle
Posted on 10/01/2022 9:31:47 AM PDT by daniel1212
it's been over 80 years since a major conflict has broken out in europe the
conflict has broken out in europe the
result has left many with a deep sense
of uncertainty nearly 70 percent of
americans surveyed by the american
psychological association feared that we
are at the beginning stages of world war
iii the prospect of nuclear conflict
once unthinkable is now a very real
possibility today we're going to explore
the unthinkable how would the united
states respond during a nuclear conflict
what's america's nuclear war plan how
many nuclear weapons are readily
available to the president where are
they what are their targets how many
missiles would be launched how many
casualties could we expect after
american bombs reach their destinations
what would the world look like going
forward and most importantly could the
united states win a global nuclear war
the united states operates under a
nuclear triad consisting of land-based
intercontinental ballistic missiles or
icbms sea-based submarines armed with
submarine launch ballistic missiles or
slbms and air-based strategic bombers
carrying gravity bombs and air-launched
nuclear cruise missiles now let's take a
look at each part of america's triad and
its weapon delivery systems the first
and most well-known part of america's
nuclear trad is its land-based
intercontinental ballistic missiles or
icbms the us has 400 lgm 30 minute man 3
icbms that are launched via silos
these 400 missiles have a range of over
6 000 miles and have near pinpoint
accuracy when launched the three strays
miniman 3 travels at speeds of over 15
000 miles per hour reaching its target
in under 30 minutes each minute man 3
missile carries one warhead 200 minute
man 3 missiles are armed with a 335
kiloton w87 mark 21a warhead while the
other half are armed with a 300 kiloton
w78 mark 12 warhead each warhead has
around 40 times the destructive power of
the bombs dropped on japan in 1945.
america's miniman 3 silos are based in
three rural areas the 90th missile wing
at fe warren air base in colorado
nebraska and wyoming the 91st missile
wing at minot air force base in north
dakota in the 341st missile wing in
maelstrom air force base in montana each
wing has three squadrons and each
squadron has 50 minute man 3 silos
they're collectively controlled by five
heart and underground control launch
centers each operated with two military
officers around the clock at all times
in the event that launch command centers
are destroyed in a surprise attack or
the military officers inhabiting the
launch command control centers get cold
feet these missiles can and will be
remotely launched from an airborne
command center carrying out orders from
the president as with all things there
are advantages and disadvantages of the
silo based minuteman 3. its primary
advantage is that these 400 missiles
make the most responsive leg of the
nuclear triad america's land-based icbm
force has remained on continuous
around-the-clock 24 7 alert since 1959
they could be quickly launched in less
than five minutes america's silo based
a strategic advantage as well due to the
remote launch capability an effective
nuclear attack against america's
minutemen 3 silos will require at least
400 warheads a one bomb aimed at each
silo forcing the enemy to use and
deplete a considerable amount of the
nuclear arsenal but this strategic
advantage also highlights the minimum
3's disadvantages america's land-based
miniman 3s are inherently vulnerable as
their location is commonly known and
therefore silos can and will be easily
targeted as a result in the event of a
large-scale attack the president would
be put in a sticky situation he or she
would have to either use these 400
missiles or lose them forcing a large
scale of retaliatory attack in response
to perceived incoming warheads targeting
american silos with enemy missiles
already in flight the leader of the free
world would only have 15 minutes to
decide and once a missile is launched
there is no churning back
the second arm of america's nuclear
triad is its air-based strategic bombers
the u.s air force currently operates a
fleet of 66 strategic bombers america's
strategic bombers are organized into
nine bomb squadrons and five bomb wings
at three bases minute air force base in
north dakota barksdale air force base in
louisiana and whitman air force base in
missouri there are 300 nuclear weapons
currently deployed at strategic bomber
bases in the u.s an additional 100
tactical nuclear bombs are to plant at
nato air bases in europe america's
bomber fleet consists of 46 b-52 strata
fortress bombers and 20 b-2 stealth
bombers the b-2 stealth bomber can carry
up to 16 1200 kiloton nuclear gravity
bombs each gravity bomb contains a
massive payload of 150 times the
destructive power of the bomb drop to
hiroshima the b-52 strata fortress
bomber is a long-range heavy bomber with
the ability to travel up to 9000 miles
without refueling the b-52 carries up to
20 agm-86 subsonic air launch cruise
missiles when launched the agm-86
missile can travel over 1500 miles at
speeds exceeding 555 miles per hour
using its independent guidance system to
deliver a w80 150 kiloton warhead to its
target in less than 90 seconds each
warhead contains around 20 times the
destructive power of the bomb dropped on
hiroshima the primary advantage of using
air-based strategic bombers is that they
can be called back if necessary
furthermore subsonic air launched
nuclear cruise missiles are a lot harder
to defend against when launched an enemy
force would have to counter-attack each
missile individually making defense
costly and complicated the small size
also makes them difficult to detect on
the primary disadvantage of strategic
bombers is their response time they take
a lot longer to get in the air and if
air bases aren't on high alert or if
planes aren't already in flight there's
a high probability of them being
destroyed in an initial surprise attack
this is particularly true for bomber
the last and most important part of
america's nuclear triad are its
nuclear-powered ballistic missile
submarines the u.s navy operates a fleet
of 14 ohio-class ballistic missile
submarines each submarine carries 20
trident ii submarine-launched ballistic
missiles the trident ii sobm is the most
destructive weapon in america's nuclear
arsenal each missile is armed with
either four or five 475 kiloton w88
warheads in theory each sub can launch
his entire 20 missile payload virtually
undetected in under seven minutes
when launched the three-stage trident ii
travels at speeds of over 18 000 miles
per hour has a range of over 7 500 miles
and typically reaches its target or
targets in around 15 minutes each
warhead is guided by a multiple
independently targetable re-entry
vehicle or mirv allowing a single
trident ii missile to deliver up to five
warheads to five separate targets just
one trident two missile alone armed with
five warheads has 154 times the
destructive power of the bomb dropped on
hiroshima overall the us has around 70
percent of all of its warheads on
submarines and with good reason
there are numerous advantages of the
ballistic missile submarine for starters
they make up the most survivable leg of
the nuclear triad ballistic missile
submarines are virtually undetectable at
sea their stealth design makes finding
one an almost impossible task giving
paws to potential adversaries with at
least 10 submarines on constant patrol
at all times ballistic missile
submarines assure that the us can strike
at any time anywhere even after a
surprise attack with each sub carrying
an average of 100 warheads each they
have enough firepower to make just one
submarine the sixth most powerful
nuclear power in the world in terms of
disadvantages there simply are none
when people imagine a nuclear war the
first thing that comes to mind is large
cities like los angeles and moscow being
incinerated in a blaze of nuclear
hellfire while this would definitely be
a likely outcome the reality is that
around 70 of the 1800 nuclear warheads
currently deployed by the united states
aren't aimed at large cities but instead
added enemy countries nuclear forces to
better understand this we first need to
take a look at america's current
strategic nuclear war plan also known as
a single integrated operational plan or
psyop first drawing up in 1950 the saya
focused primarily on the soviet union
while today most of the weapons in the
war plan still target russia other
countries such as china north korea
india and pakistan are included as well
in this video we'll take a look at a
nuclear exchange with the only nuclear
power comparable to the united states
the russian federation this portion of
america's nuclear war plan is called
major attack option 1. major attack
option 1 is the most demanding attack
option available to the president should
the commander-in-chief order major
attack option 1 the resulting attack
would consist of over 1 000 warheads
targeting russian nuclear forces
including icbm silos road mobile icbms
submarine bases primary airfields
nuclear storage facilities design and
production complexes critical command
and control facilities and civilian
population centers now let's take a look
at a major attack option 1 its russian
targets the american nuclear weapons
used and the overall outcome of an
american thermonuclear attack on russia
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Outdoors; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: icbm; nuclearwar; nukes; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: HartleyMBaldwin
LOL! I would not doubt for a second Biden or Kamala would mention that in a speech “Today Russia launched a nuclear missile....we are going to respond in a gender inclusive way with race base equity..”
21
posted on
10/01/2022 10:19:38 AM PDT
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
To: Rummyfan
“We cannot allow a mineshaft gap, Mr President!”
To: Dr. Sivana
It’s automated transcription from You Tube. Most folks eliminate the time stamps.
To: daniel1212
For decades nuclear war was universally unthinkable. The Cold War was a “Mexican Standoff” as it were. Now however, it is totally thinkable given the historically inept, ignorant, corrupt and profoundly anti-American federal government we suffer.
24
posted on
10/01/2022 11:13:33 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: cgbg
I got one, why don’t you?
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
These are the people a good old fashioned nuclear war would get rid of and the nation would the better for it! Thin out the herd!
To: daniel1212
What we DO know is people of color and trannies will be hardest hit.
27
posted on
10/01/2022 11:24:37 AM PDT
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
To: BenLurkin
All of our enemies have been defeating us without declaring
any kind of war over the past 4 decades...
Russia, China, Iran, Muslims, Mexico, the EU, and Pakistan have all waged and won either economic or political influence against the Disunited States quite easily...
Migration alone has doomed America as a world power and solidified the slide into communism...
They are all hanging around like vultures waiting for the last little twitch...
To: dpetty121263
We dropped to bombs on Japan. The devastation was further than ground zero and longer the war. Nuclear would signal end of our World as we know it.
To: daniel1212
Washington, New York, Groton, CT. San Fran, San Diego and L.A. - gone in a strategic strike. Houston - gone. Gulf Coast, gone.
30
posted on
10/01/2022 11:34:09 AM PDT
by
atc23
(The Matriarchal Society we embrace has led to masks and mandates and the cult of "safety")
To: dpetty121263
I like the “fight racism” signs. It perfectly explains how these idiots are completely controlled by the leftist propaganda media. There is not a shred nor has there ever been the slightest shred of evidence Trump is racist. Meanwhile we have endless examples of Biden being racist and they say NOTHING.
31
posted on
10/01/2022 11:47:22 AM PDT
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
To: frnewsjunkie
Nuclear war is survivable, granted some places would not fair well like East and West Coast Cities, certain areas in the upper Central Mid-West Minuteman ICBM fields and downwind areas would be hot for some time..But a good percentage of the Nation would survive...things would be dangerous for a while till Law and Order was regained...
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Fully owned and paid for!
To: dpetty121263
“I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” – Albert Einstein.
Just one Hiroshima size nuke detonation over a city like Chicago would create more burn victims than all of the burn centers in the country combined could handle.
A follow on thought....in 1990 the US Army did a study on the minimum amount of nukes it would take to destroy Americas ability to function as a country. Their answer was 10 Megatons...which works out to 33 stragegic city buster nukes at 330KT each placed at various sensitive sites...ports, infrastructure, DC, bases, etc. You can figure in 6 tactical nukes at 50KT each and remove one strategic nuke for smaller targets. *Remember 50KT is more than 4X Hiroshima.
Now...they (US Army) also estimated (again in 1990) that there were a total of 5000Megatons of nuclear weapons combined between all nuclear capable countries of that time. If you use Hiroshima as the metric (15KT kills 100K people) then 5000Megatons works out to 34 Billion people dead. That is FIVE Times the number of humans on this planet. The death, disease, starvation, birth defects, nuclear winter, black market economies, bandits....the existence of the worlds civilizations would be set to a horrifying reality that is beyond imagination for many many years easy and decades probably. Uninhabitable Chernobyl-like 'exclusion zones' would span millions of square miles not just 1000sqr mi with water and food contaminated for decades.
So....sticks and stones dude. Sticks and stones....
34
posted on
10/01/2022 12:49:42 PM PDT
by
know.your.why
(If you dont watch the MSM you are uninformed. If you do watch the MSM you are misinformed.)
To: BobL
Can’t we hide in NYC subway? On 2nd thought it will probably be safer outside than inside because of the crime rate.
35
posted on
10/01/2022 12:51:02 PM PDT
by
353FMG
(Secretly practicing my Putin swagger..)
To: 353FMG
Sure. Great plan. You’ll have exactly as much chance to run and hide as the ppl in Hiroshima/Nagasaki. You may want to just move in there now.
36
posted on
10/01/2022 1:01:30 PM PDT
by
know.your.why
(If you dont watch the MSM you are uninformed. If you do watch the MSM you are misinformed.)
To: Dr. Sivana
"I give up, which book in the Bible is this from?" I know of no place, nor for WW1 or WW2, or even for America with any clarity, but the Bible does speak of "sudden destruction:"
For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. (1 Thessalonians 5:3)
Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed. (Luke 17:28-30)
And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares. For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth. (Luke 21:34-35)
How this takes place in the context of the Great Tribulation I am not sure not, but the closest description of a nuclear blast is that of which likely comes at the coming revelation of Christ:
In that day shall the Lord defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of the Lord before them. And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem. And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn. (Zechariah 12:8-10)
For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the Lord go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle. (Zechariah 14:2-3)
And this shall be the plague wherewith the Lord will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth. (Zechariah 14:12)
37
posted on
10/01/2022 1:02:44 PM PDT
by
daniel1212
(Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him who saves, be baptized + follow Him!)
To: know.your.why
You seem to miss the point that much of the former Soviet nuclear fleet is aging rapidly with substandard to no maintenance or replacement parts to boot as many ICBM’s are not flight ready. I saw an article that detailed the point that the process the Soviets and now Russians use to process their nuclear material causes many nukes to degrade much quicker than the US and may not even explode or if they do greatly reduced yield..Also add this that Officers in the Russian Strategic forces CIC command may not follow Putin’s orders..happened during the Cuban Missile crisis as Putin is not well liked. There was a report before Iran got some nukes they bought some on the Black Market that were “supposed” to the latest and greatest Soviet models and it was found them to be junk and useless. My main concern would be Chemical and Bio warfare as the Soviets searched the World for the most dangerous and deadly diseases and weaponized them. It was said that when the Soviets pulled out of the Ukraine they left entire bio labs intact with every manner of disease imaginable including weaponized Small Pox..You do not need any advanced weapons system to spread terror with that..just a few infected people and commerical airlines..
To: daniel1212
Watched it. A Pollyanna-ish view of how things would work out. I remember the NTB out in Colorado east of Colorado Springs. That’s all they did was wargame BS like this on massive computer simulations. And I don’t recall seeing anything about how China might position itself real-time during this play.
39
posted on
10/01/2022 1:14:33 PM PDT
by
Gaffer
(I)
To: dpetty121263
Yup. Much better way to die, huh? Guess its good to stay positive. IF nuclear war happens....I just hope that I dont feel the one that gets me and I hope I’m very near ground zero.
40
posted on
10/01/2022 1:30:08 PM PDT
by
know.your.why
(If you dont watch the MSM you are uninformed. If you do watch the MSM you are misinformed.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson