BTW, if you don't like Dr. Mercola, just move along to another post/thread & spare me the Dr. M 'bashing' - I've heard it all before. CHD is a good source & doesn't post cr@p.
Ping
dint i read about some “bad batches” in red states/cities?
#1 This explains why some people react differently to the vaccine.
#2 This explains they don't want different batches to be examined. This is a huge red flag. Don't look too close at our Frankenbatch of injections.
#3 Some vials may have way more spike proteins than others proving a lack of quality control that nobody needs to know about (until 75 years from now).
Thanks.
BKMK
In before the “correlation is not causation” deniers.
www.HowBadIsMyBatch.com
I looked up someone’s 2 poison shot batches at their request. There were 50 deaths and thousands of health issues reported on just those 2 lot numbers.
The numbers are no doubt even higher since the data was first put on that site.
“For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%”
doesn’t make sense; even 99.9% of intact mRNA won’t work?
The purpose of jabs is to make money for royalties and stock options ... so why should it matter if they don’t do anything else? Congress (who are likely investors) have already protected big pharma anyway.
“BTW, if you don’t like Dr. Mercola, just move along to another post/thread & spare me the Dr. M ‘bashing’ - I’ve heard it all before. CHD is a good source & doesn’t post cr@p.”
i wasn’t going to “bash” mercola until i read that, but for some reason i now feel COMPELLED to bash him! so consider him bashed ...
I’ll tell you what: I have not had “the jab!” I will NOT get “the jab!”
I will take my chances, and since I have had, and survived, the Chinese Communist Coronavirus, I have “natural immunity.”
These know-it-all mfers best leave me alone!
FURTHEREMORE, despite the TOTALLY INSANE “CONGRESSIONAL PROTECTIONS,” IT IS TIME TO SUE THE BASTARDS!
AND THE “SCIENTISTS” WHO PROMOTED THIS INSANTITY!
CONFISCATE ALL THEIR ASSETS!
RUINEM!
The shot is exactly what they call it - an ‘experiment.’ Can your mind get around what these genocidal megalomaniacs and their cohorts are up to regarding earth’s humanity? Truth be known their experiments are being engineered and conducted in collusion with off-planet demons. I say demons because these entities do not view man any differently than they view our cattle, which they mutilate and destroy at will. To them, Planet Earth is nothing more than an experimental laboratory. Our cowardly ‘leaders’ let the intruders get away with this in exchange for being allowed earthly dominion over us. In essence, our so-called leaders have sold us out to the Devil for the Biblical thirty pieces of silver. For whatever reason, the off-planet intruders have become more aggressive in conducting their human experimentations, which now appears to be an all-out effort to re-engineer God’s creation. Is it the Devil getting even with his chief protagonists? Will God’s faithful let them have their way?
p
Pfizer, Moderna, and all the rest of the vaxx manufacturers, should be nuked from orbit, with all of their manufacturing plants. All executives should be hunted down and executed.
Thank yu for posting this. Anyone who continues taking mRNA inniculation is playing Russian Roulette.
Als you need to know that there are protocols for stripping spike protein from ones system.
The protocols are here:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-recover-post-vaccine-treatment/
Great stuff.
I still think the overall creation is AI it's too complex for most anyone to put it all together. It's an extremely sophisticated plan/OP to screw with humans on a broad scale and accomplish probably a dozen purposes.
The key purpose would be what Lieber is doing:
create a super solider, a cyborg.
....................................
Here's Malones latest:
Cyborgs as just the beginning.
After looking into Malone I am coming to believe that this guy trys to play all sides and so far has been wildly successful.Will he be able to keep it up? Hard to say.
..........................
Human Cyborgs are Just the Beginning.
The USG Administrative State believes that Human Augmentation is ‘Imperative’
Robert W Malone MD, MS
Sep 14
DownloadCCDC CBC-TR-1599, Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Implications for the Future of the DOD
The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (Alexandria, VA) established the DOD Biotechnologies for Health and Human Performance Council (BHPC) study group to continually assess research and development in biotechnology.
The BHPC group assesses scientific advances for improved health and performance with potential military application; identifies corresponding risks and opportunities and ethical, legal, and social implications; and provides senior leadership with recommendations for mitigating adversarial threats and maximizing opportunities for future.
U.S. forces. At the direction of the BHPC Executive Committee, the BHPC study group conducted a year-long assessment entitled “Cyborg Soldier 2050: Human/Machine Fusion and the Impact for the Future of the DOD”. The primary objective of this effort was to forecast and evaluate the military implications of machines that are physically integrated with the human body to augment and enhance human performance over the next 30 years.
(All this wreaks of what dr. Charles Lieber has been doing in China for over 20 years. Who knows how far he has gotten.We do know he has 66 patents in this field)
This report summarizes this assessment and findings; identifies four potential military-use cases for new technologies in this area; and assesses their impact upon the DOD organizational structure, warfighter doctrine and tactics, and interoperability with U.S. allies and civil society.
.......................
Documents leaked from the EMA confirms why we aren't allowed to analyze the vaccine vials.
It's like rolling the dice for what you get in your vial.
Both the FDA and EMA knew this but kept this out of the public view because if it were known, nobody would take the vaccines.
Steve Kirsch,P> Aug 31
One of my readers has been trying to get my attention for 8 months on the EMA data leak that happened nearly 2 years ago.
He recently posted this substack article documenting his attempts to get visibility on what the EMA document leak revealed.
The gem in the article is this video which was posted 18 months ago that few people have seen. The video is just 14 minutes long and is very well done. The findings are all consistent with what I and others have long suspected: the vials are all different.
(The first time I read this I was thinking this is not done by humans this is AI crap and I still think that)
The key finding is the reason they won't let anyone analyze the vials: mRNA is not intact. The BMJ wrote about this on March 10, 2021 [my comments are in brackets]:
On Nov 23, 2020, EMA knew about the quality control issues with severely compromised mRNA integrity (ranging from 78% to 55%). [It's supposed to be 100% if you want an effective vaccine.]
Just two days later, a source in the US said the lots were now “back at around 70-75%, which leaves us cautiously optimistic that additional data could address the issue.”
(this shows that Pfizer Moderna the rest all play with the mix no one ever knows what they are getting)
“The complete, intact mRNA molecule is essential to its potency as a vaccine,” professor of biopharmaceutics Daan J.A. Crommelin and colleagues wrote in a review article in The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences late last year.”
The BMJ asked Pfizer, Moderna, and CureVac, as well as several regulators, what percentage mRNA integrity they consider acceptable for vaccines against covid-19. None offered any specifics.(that should tell you all you ever need to know right there--the fix is in,its a huge con) [“Wow, that's really comforting. ”]
The EMA told The BMJ that the levels of truncated mRNA “and the amounts of a potential protein produced by the truncated mRNA would be too low to constitute a safety risk.” [uh… how does the EMA know that exactly?]
Health Canada told The BMJ that Pfizer had conducted investigations into the root cause of reduced integrity in the commercial vaccine batches, and “changes were made in their processes to ensure that the integrity was improved and brought in line with what was seen for clinical trial batches.” Health Canada said the three agencies subsequently determined that “there was no concern with the RNA integrity or any other product specifications.” [Whew! Now I'm relieved! No data on the new levels produced. If you can't trust Pfizer, who can you trust?]
In general, the BMJ wasn't happy about anything they heard from the regulators. They were basically stonewalled in their requests.
The fact that it's illegal for anyone to analyze the vials (they are government property) doesn't help inspire confidence at all.
Even if you are getting 100% intact mRNA which would be really rare, you're still not getting anything that resembles the virus. So the efficacy as far as PROTECTING you will be next to nothing. However, what it will do very effectively, if you got reasonably intact mRNA, is to cause you significant harm. You are playing a game of chance with your immune system and what is in the bottle. (this is the key to the entire scam no one ever knows what they are getting.With that in mind its hard to make a case against the mfg. much less do any relevant research into what they are doing with over 2,000 different vaccines each one a little bit and sometimes a lot different)
The video highlights some of the things we learned from the EMA data breach:
The EMA claims the documents were manipulated to make them look bad, but won't say how they were manipulated. I'm not buying the EMA story at all.
The Members of the European Parliament (MEP) weren't allowed to read the contracts with the vaccine makers (only heavily redacted versions). Again, if you can't trust Pfizer and the EMA, who can you trust?
The mRNA is unstable, even at the required temperatures because light, movement (like shipping it to a destination), and any temperature variation disrupts it.
Unstable mRNA means the spike protein (which was artificially propped up) could collapse making the whole process useless to support immunity, but still dangerous in terms of damage to cells. So you get all the risk and no benefit.(more bottom line stuff here!!
The mRNA integrity was better in the clinical trial than commercial batches. But don't assume that the vaccine worked in the trials since the trials were heavily gamed to produce favorable outcomes, mostly by excluding people with weak immune systems from the vaccine group (this is why there were 5X the number of exclusions in the vax group). So you're looking at a vaccine which likely does absolutely nothing except make people believe they are protected. This mind control works quite well.(more bottom line stuff here--its all mind control)
People bought the story for over a year before they realized they were getting infected at the same rate as people who didn't get the vaccine.
The mRNA integrity varied between countries.
Pfizer never told anyone that the commercial vaccines had lower mRNA integrity than the vaccines used in the trials. This is unethical, bordering on fraud.
The EMA tried to cover it up. Instead of protecting the public and making Pfizer look bad, the EMA basically covered up the problem.
Pfizer never told the public or governments about the risks associated with mRNA integrity. If it wasn't for the leak, we'd never have known. But it's all OK because the drug companies are exempt from any liability. The patient takes all the risk here, not the drug companies.
EMA was concerned about visible particles in the vials. The BMJ never investigated that. Is it still a problem? I don't think anyone cares to know the answer to that.
The deaths in the trials are all dismissed as “unrelated to the vaccine” without doing the proper analysis.
There should be an investigation into these issues, but the governments are not going to expose their own fraud since it would be too embarrassing so nothing will happen.
Summary
This video summarizing the leaked EMA documents constitutes yet more evidence that the vaccines confer no benefits, only risk.
However, like everything else, it will be ignored by the authorities.
However, this is important information for the public to know about how they(the public) are being manipulated into taking a useless vaccine.
NOBODY is calling for any quality control here.
Have you ever seen a study where the authors collect vials randomly and sequence them? It's not going to happen. Not in my lifetime.