“For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%”
doesn’t make sense; even 99.9% of intact mRNA won’t work?
Here’s a video with a lot of discussion on RNA ... it seems to me that with the % of RNA varying wildly between clinical trials, use in the public, between countries, etc. that anything less than 100$ is suspect. Just my opinon.
What does the EMA leak show?
https://www.brighteon.com/f038068d-862b-41ae-81fe-96bcd52c4cb7
I’m thinking this might not be an issue with the J&J since it apparently was more stable?
Still...my batch showed 36 deaths in VAERS..and I had episodes of pounding heart. I did the Front Line Doctors protocol and seem to have gotten through it.
Imagine A v8 engine missing just one spark plug.
How far is that going to get you down The road?
For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%”
doesn’t make sense; even 99.9% of intact mRNA won’t work
Xxxxxx
I read tha mrna in vaccines was modified to act longer than usual.
For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%”
doesn’t make sense; even 99.9% of intact mRNA won’t work
Xxxxxx
I read tha mrna in vaccines was modified to act longer than usual.
For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%”
doesn’t make sense; even 99.9% of intact mRNA won’t work
Xxxxxx
I read tha mrna in vaccines was modified to act longer than usual.
Hard to post????