Posted on 08/26/2022 12:58:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Fractal Trader]
An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.
The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”
The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”
Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction. The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.
In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.
We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47
Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.”
We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:
Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.
The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.
Our results are so similar to those of Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.
What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”
In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.
In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.
In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47
Further resources:
- Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
- Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
- The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
- The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
- Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
- Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
- German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
- Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
- German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
Very well said.
I eluded to this on the 18th.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=207#207
Notice how it’s important to find out who.
In the context at the time that was factually accurate. Please remember there is a timeline to consider. And as knowledge has evolved have I said the same thing?
*********************************************
It was not factually accurate, it was inaccurate.
Facts don’t change over time. They are either proven true, or proven false. Your statements were proven false.
You were the one that called people Dumbasses, when they were the ones proven to be correct.
You were the one that kept posting your education, while calling others uneducated. Although, you were the one that turned out to be uneducated about the facts.
There are millions of people that were lied to, fooled, and mislead about this vaccine. They made the best decision they could at the time, and I’m sure you did too.
However, you also seem incapable of showing even the slightest amount of humility.
“When pride comes, then comes disgrace, but with humility comes wisdom.”
Proverbs 11:2
The “doctors” touting the various conspiracy theories about the vaccines in “articles” posted to FR are almost exclusively grifters, kooks, have an axe to grind or are not real doctors.
These include the likes of twice-convicted felon and former chiropractor “Dr” Robert O Young, retired chiropractor “Dr” Bryan Ardis (who flogs his acne cream and “anti-vaccine” supplements online), Frontline Doctors (at least one of whom is a total kook and they are all raking in the $ off their website), and Dr. Ryan Cole who, in pursuit of “proving” his dodgy claims misdiagnosed cancer in patients and caused at least one woman to get drastic and unnecessary surgery*.
Then there’s the discredited and kooky Dr. Naomi Wolf, whose PhD is in English Lit and has no science background. And “Dr” Jane Ruby, who despite getting herself up in white coat with stethoscope draped around her neck, is not an MD — she has a PhD in psychology and one in education — and is a Nurse Practitioner.
The most respectable of the lot is Dr. Robert Malone, but he has quite the chip on his shoulder, a bit an axe to grind, and overstates his credentials somewhat. At least he had the integrity to put the kabosh on the monkeypox conspiracy theories his fans had started spouting, and I respect him for that. He’s also been vaccinated and boosted himself.
I’m sure there are other doctors or “doctors” I have left out, but you get the idea.
There are over a million physicians in the US, over 9 million worldwide. You think they are all too scared or too wicked to speak up about the “massive” and “horrifying” deaths, diseases and other dire consequences befalling the vaccinated, or have been bought off. Do you truly think all but a tiny handful out of over 9 million are too scared, too wicked or are being bought off? There are plenty of physicians with good hearts who are about to retire or who have enough wealth to retire early and therefore have no reason to be afraid of losing their licenses — are they all too scared, too wicked, bought off? I’m sure you think so.
If all these crazy things are in the vaccines, why have only a very few, very dodgy “researchers” (like Robert O Young) claimed to have found them? What about all the public health batch checkers all over the world peering through their microscopes? All scared, evil or bought off, of course. I posted links to the UK and Australian protocols for batch checking imported vaccines here long ago, and that was the reaction from the vax doomers here.
Why haven’t the Russians found all this stuff that is supposedly in the vaccines? They have microscopes, too, even really fancy ones. It would be quite the coup for them and their Sputnik vaccine. You’ll say they are evil and want us all to die, of course.
No, I’m not trying to convince you of anything. None of what I have written will cause you to change your mind, or even stop and think.
*”The latest complaint said Cole had misdiagnosed a 64-year-old woman, who then had urgent surgery to remove the cancerous body parts — only to learn she didn’t actually have cancer.”
If you mean the “rubbery” clots, one supposedly “the length of the entire leg”, these clots are postmortem “chicken fat clots”:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4038551/posts?page=21#21
That is an excellent analysis. Add to it that one of the parts of Q theory is currently that real doctors say things on line and risk themselves while no one else who refuses to identify are credible.
However there is excellent articles examining the professionals who are advancing quackery and they are referred to as the dirty dozen. Tenpenny, Malone, Mercola (who is not an MD but DO), Kennedy (yes related to Ted and the liberals of Mass), McCoullugh (false representations of academic associations sued by Baylor), and Gold). All of these professionals whom Q theory hold out to be the only experts in the field have benefited financially greatly by their manipulations of social media.
It appears to me that based on your articles and info, Q theory trades on narcissistic group think. Tale as old as time.
Thanks for the outstanding info. I am sure there will be some pushback.
To ensure compliance with an applicable preliminary nationwide injunction, which may be supplemented, modified or vacated, depending on the course of ongoing litigation, the federal government will take no action to implement or enforce the COVID-19 vaccination requirement pursuant to Executive Order 14043 on Requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Federal Employees. Therefore, to the extent a federal job announcement includes the requirement that applicants must be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 pursuant to Executive Order 14043, that requirement does not currently apply.
This on USA Jobs
Yes, ask for the D-dimer.
1. There is no proof of correctness of those who were and continue to be wrong on numerous issues surrounding vaccination
2. As knowledge as evolved so has my thinking. That is what scientists are supposed to do. However, your side is that of the arrogant or prideful. The judgment those who ascribe to Q theory while simultaneous flouting scripture is perhaps anathema to the faith.
3. Please do not confuse authority (understanding and education on issues) as arrogance. That is a cliche. I never called for mandatory vaccination though was accused of same. I reacted to being called a Nazi and a murdered. That is just to react to. Are you suggesting that being smeared in the most vile of ways makes me arrogant to respond? Please. Tell me your opinion of most of the Q posters calling me and my colleagues who post here as follows:
1. Murderers
2. Nazis
3. Fraudsters
4. Accomplices to crimes against humanity
People have called for our summary executions, assaults and imprisonment. And yes, one has identified me and made it known in my church through his or her friends. So you condemn this? If so where and when? If not yet, how about now?
Do you accept that this overbearing treatment and relentless positing of perhaps fringe articles are harming the financial contribution to this forum?
Please, I am curious as to your answers.
I see two power-tripping members of this forum threatening to *sue* people for libel. That’s beyond appalling. Threatening to sue people just to be vindictive against those who disagree with them and stand up to their insulting bullying.
I’m glad to see the threatened FReeper(s) giving this narcissistic behavior the ridicule it deserves, but people should be ashamed of even making such smarmy, sleazy threats.
And these are the same people who whine about how others talked mean to them or whatever. And they wonder why people suspect that they’re trolls??
Nice conspiracy theory.
Let the record show that 'this type of commentary' has been a FReepublic mainstay since its inception on any number of topics.
A handful of FReepers have postulated this conspiracy theory. Those same handful represent those who have joined with the derp media, politicians, CIA, China, and the entire deep state to silence the Q information and prevent the masses of people from reading it or even thinkng about it.
This is, and has been, a tactic to get Q 'thrown off' FR And to supress the truth. It worked all across the internet, so why not here? It is an attempt to censor, nothing more. I'm surprised at you, GW.
Tell me. If questioning and discussing 'fringe' theories is harming donations, what of the government groupthink and repeating the government narrative of the now exposed government lies re: covid/vax? And the mockery of any opposed to it? Would that be 'bad for donations'?
Why does it only go one way?
Here's a thought. The entire covid/vax psyop is a conspiracy theory. How many lies were the people of the world told about the covid, where it came from, who is responsible, the safety and efficacy of the fake vaccines, the number and even existance of 'adverse effects'.
Those unnumbered lies from the top down are proof positive of a conspiracy. How you can deny that and then turn around and call exposing the truth a 'conspiracy theory' only proves that your brain doesn't work right and you are a sub-standard thinker.
Sue me.
Okay, so you admit the existence of rubbery clots, but ignore when they say they've never seen anything like it.
More faulty brain work.
#SueMe
Keep going on your cruises and you may find out. Seriously, 4 shots of this crap? You have no idea what the short and long term effects of these shots will be. Like Russian roulette.
You know better than to call that 'Q theory'.
All of these professionals whom Q theory hold out to be the only experts in the field have benefited financially greatly by their manipulations of social media.
It appears to me that based on your articles and info, Q theory trades on narcissistic group think. Tale as old as time.
No, 'Q theory', as you are now calling it, allows for exposure to alternate opinions, facts, and even reality other than what is presented to the world by the enemy. Its a 'think for yourself' kinda thing. But you know this.
Did VaxHerd slip something in your drink, or what? Who took over your account?
How come a full list of ingreidents haven’t been made public? The manufacturers are hiding behind “intellectual property” bs in order so people don’t know what is in them. Keep going on with your bs. Many of us wonder if you are part of the digital warriors the Deep State infiltrated into our midst!
Do you accept that this overbearing treatment and relentless positing of the now exposed fraudulent and harmful government position re; the covid/vax psyop by government apparatchiks such as yourself and many others is harming the financial contribution to this forum?
Did you ever see the movie 'Lenny' about the life of Lenny Bruce? The movie devolved into him getting up on stage and reading news clippings and whining about how he was being censored and oppressed. Not a lick of humor in his act at all.
You are the new Lenny Bruce, gassie. Your 'oh poor me, I'll sue' shtick is getting old and completely boring.
Its the sign of a shattered mind, you ask me.
You can scroll down to the section titled “Full list of ingredients” in the Moderna vaccine here:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/Moderna.html
Of course some here won’t accept anything from the CDC and will insist this is a lie and there really are all sorts of kooky things in the vaccines.
Your narrative is incorrect. I am not threatening anything. After many threats from an individual doxx me, the line has been crossed. Let me connect the dots for you.
1. It is specifically stated in the forum that attempts to find the true identity of a member of this forum is forbidden
2. Several times this particular poster threatened to do just that and at the same time accused me of criminal activity as well as civilly actionable activities
3. This individual then posted knowledge of a family member who attends my church.
4. I was approached by that family member who specifically identified free republic as the source of the individual who identified me
5. I specifically asked that this family member not tell me any further info as the identity of poster as it would violate the rules
6. Now having direct and actionable proof that a poster violated the rules of the forum, followed through on a thread, and the words accusing me of crimes that this poster made historically satisfies all elements of the tort of libel.
7. The question of the failure of taking action against the poster by the leadership and specifically leading to allowing this libel to occur and not addressing it leads to the concept of vicarious liability
8. There is no way I would choose that path as it is not leaderships or ownerships problem how a poster chooses to act. Others might take a different approach. But as for me i do not hold ownership responsible on anyway. The mods have let this behavior go, but so what. It’s a volunteer position and I know the mods do the best they can
9. The only person who has caused damage is this individual who could have said whatever he wanted but decided he had to know who I was most likely to intimidate me
10. I am now considering my options. I have two years to decide what I want to do. It’s hardly a threat it is an accurate and transparent disclosure of what is occurring.
Would you care to speak to whether you condemn being identified in my private life. Would you comment on do you condemn the accusation of criminal activity and threats arising having my profession stripped from me because I disagree with a minority of people who are repeatedly sources here (see my previous posts).
Will anyone take the position of condemning being called a criminal, accused of malpractice without foundation and having my anonymity violated. Do you not see that the line that was crossed was the identification piece. Until then there was nothing wrong. Say what you want when you want. But when I was identified and the statements are patently false and damaging (accusation of criminal activity) is what the problem is.
By the way, I am not the only one.
There is one other that I am aware of.
So when people who have done something well out of bounds may be held accountable, it seems to me this is justice. The fact that it will be costly for the respondent is just the way of the judicial system. Perhaps he or she should have thought twice before taking the step over the clear line
Or do you support the actions of doxxing members is this forum?
I look forward to your response.
And why wouldn't we? Why do YOU accept the word of proven liars?
You are maladjusted and there is no consistency to your rhetoric.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.