Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[ransomnote]

*applause*
Outstanding post encapsulating the absurdity of anonymous posters ‘lording it over’ the actual physicians providing evidence and putting themselves on the line (getting threats, fired, stripped of hospital rights etc.). All the while, the anonymous fake experts accuse those public doctors of being ‘grifters,’ even though we know the tremendous sacrifices those real doctors are making to reach the public with the truth.

[David Chase]

Here’s how it was explained to me a few years ago by my brother.
I don’t think anything has changed.

On many internet sites people use pseudo type names. Like here, and yahoo message boards, etc.

On THOSE sites if you say something that defames a person under a fake name, it’s not as powerful of libel because they’re not using their real name, but it’s still a possible cause of action.

For example; “Echo29 sells drugs and has sold drugs that killed people.”

Now, if someone were to be Doxxed and their real Identity exposed, it changes everything.

For example; “Echo29 is John Dough he lives at 12345 Main Street, Reno, Nevada.”

That means now the statement of “Echo29 sells drugs….” is attached to John Dough.

John Dough has a strong cause for action because of Libel. Depending on the State in which John Dough resides, different infractions may apply.

Which brings up Facebook……..where most people use their real names so they can be found by friends and family and be identified with their personal “page”.

It’s different when the person is using their real name. Because if they have Cause they can take action quickly and easier if someone makes libelist statements about them. On Facebook it’s often Broadcasted to a list of Friends or Professionals the Plaintiff knows and people that know them.

The clincher is the person libeled needs to show damages……OR show that the statements made about them are so egregious that any reasonable person can assume it would and/or did harm them.

I can say to John Dough, “Why are you so lazy? Mow your lawn!”.
Well, how does that damage John Dough? It really doesn’t.

But if I say to John Dough, “You are a murderer and incompetent and deserve bad things to happen to you.”

Well, John Dough can show damages even if it’s unknown if John’s Ice Cream business was hurt because of that statement.

It’s also based on what any reasonable person would say, think or do.

A Jury (or Judge in a bench trial) would have to think if they heard that about John Dough, would they avoid his Ice Cream shop?
If so, there are damages.

So direct damages doesn’t need to be proven (although it helps), a fault in libel can be found if it’s presumed a reasonable person would be influenced by a libelist statement.

This convo came up between my brother and I when I was on Facebook (before I left).
My Congressman’s Web-Site was flooded with Leftist acting like Leftist.
So I would Dox them, go to Google Street view find their home and post their address and a pic of their house.

I got their address from the voter rolls.
I didn’t defame them. I didn’t Libel them as they use their real name and voter information is public domain. I merely shook them up. Some were very upset. 😆🤣😂

By the way…….David Chase is indeed my real name as I have stated many times before.
Now ya know why. 😉

[bagster]

As set out in Fatty McTootpants vs Yarbles N. Mouth (1969: GA), libel cannot be established if the statement is provably and factually true. For example, if Hojo Hominigrits said that David Chase was a moron, there can be no libel.

Signed,

Bagster
Master of all Knowledge

[David Chase]

This is weird.

I agree.

I feel so dirty now.

[bagster]

More like retread alert.

I looked it up. That's not how you spell 'retard'.

[bagster]

This is weird. I agree. I feel so dirty now.

Wait. So you ARE capable of understanding. I will reassess your level of retardation. You may be higher on the spectrum than previously thought.

[David Chase]

Hopefully I’ll have time today to let you down again………

Oh…..wait….here’s something:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4088906/posts

[bagster]

Already on it, Professor Spazoid.

[semimojo]

OTOH, we have a cadre of mostly anonymous posters on a relatively obscure Internet forum…

Well, us and 99% of the doctors, epidemiologists, academics and public health officials around the world.

Are you seriously going to play the credentials card with the fringe anti-vax hucksters?

For every mortician finding rubberized arteries I can cite 50 top viral disease experts.

[EBH]

You are correct. There was a chart out there at one point showing the lot numbers of which ones went where.

To follow-up with you regarding vaccine injury: I had the two dose Pfizer. My blood pressure ramped up over the last year from normally acceptable levels for my age bracket to dangerously high. I got covid in late June. Mild case.

BUT...now I am on monitoring every two weeks with my doctor trying to get my blood pressure to stabilize. He asked if I had the shots, I said yes and showed him my card. He noted the lot numbers on my chart and didn’t encourage me to get my booster. (I never got any of the boosters). My bloodwork all came back normal! He didn’t do a D-dimer test, but put me on a new medication. I see him again tomorrow. I just might ask for the test.

[bagster]

Well, us and 99% of the doctors, epidemiologists, academics and public health officials around the world.

As per usual, your made up numbers are way off. Sorta like your government masters' are.

Hey, liberal troll formerly known as Mojo, you goin' to Fauci's retirement party? Watcha' gonna wear?

#ShillinForTheHomies

[bagster]

For every mortician finding rubberized arteries I can cite 50 top viral disease experts.

Do they sideline as morticians too?

Again, logic fails you.

[gas_dr]

Actually you don’t seem to understand the elements of libel. Truth is an absolute defense. Please, master of all knowledge, define moron. There is in fact a diagnosis code for moron in previous ICD publications.

[gas_dr]

In the context at the time that was factually accurate. Please remember there is a timeline to consider. And as knowledge has evolved have I said the same thing?

[bagster]

Please, master of all knowledge, define moron.

Do not back-sass the Master of All Knowledge. You are a Doctor, and a Gas Doctor at that. Stay in your lane.

Do you want to know what your sin is?

Being too big for your britches.

[metmom]

For every mortician finding rubberized arteries I can cite 50 top viral disease experts.

who are bought off, threatened, coerced, intimidated, blackmailed, or just plain evil who will play along.

[semimojo]

...who are bought off, threatened, coerced, intimidated, blackmailed, or just plain evil who will play along.

Of course they are.

Everyone but those brave few who agree with you.

[CatHerd]

>>>>>Re your:I never a cult also included someone that implored researchers to do their own, well, research into anything and everything, and to not trust what the magic box tells them. That they’ve been lied to about everything.

Last I remember, cults do everything possible to discourage individual thought. Mormons are ruthless when it comes to those that left their cult, same with Jehovah’s.<<<<<<

Ah, but that’s one of the keys to Q’s popularity. It started off as a LARP, but some people believed it was for real and started “playing” for real, and so the guys who started it began playing those people, and it caught on and grew. It’s still a LARP, only instead of players playing a game, the game is playing the players.

Former Q followers describe how it works here:

---

They also said overconfidence and arrogance play a big role in people staying in the QAnon world, as well as the belief that you are the one engaging in critical thinking while everyone else is a mindless sheep.

“At this point the problem isn’t Q, it’s gullible people who lack critical thinking skills and gain a massive ego boost in thinking they have secret in that the sheeple don’t know,” DB wrote.

“Worth noting, conspiracy thinking hooks the brain because it feels like critical thinking. Even though it isn’t.”

That piece right there really is key.

As another user explained, the “do your own research” concept works to reinforce conspiracy theories while making people think they’re coming to conclusions on their own, thanks to the way search engines and social media algorithms work:

“The idea behind the ‘research’ is that you are more likely to believe a source if YOU stumble upon it yourself vs if I tell you -go watch this video.

So if I tell you Hillary is a lizard person, watch this video ... It’s easy to watch and dismiss me as a crazy that saw a dumb video. BUT ... if I tell you Hillary is a lizard person, but don’t take my word for it - google it yourself.... and you come across hundreds of videos and articles about Hillary being a lizard person - that makes it all the more believable. Especially since there’s so many articles saying Hillary is NOT a lizard person. If it wasn’t true, why would people be making videos and articles ‘debunking’ it?

And the debunk articles are appearing higher in searches than the articles saying she is. Why is that? Is big tech in on it to ....and you see where this is going.

So their ‘research’ is just a way of manipulating people.”

https://www.upworthy.com/former-qanon-believer-q-and-a

---

A game designer describes how it works from another perspective:

---

“When I saw QAnon, I knew exactly what it was and what it was doing. I had seen it before. I had almost built it before. It was gaming’s evil twin. A game that plays people.

QAnon has often been compared to ARGs and LARPs and rightly so. It uses many of the same gaming mechanisms and rewards. It has a game-like feel to it that is evident to anyone who has ever played an ARG, online role-play (RP) or LARP before. The similarities are so striking that it has often been referred to as a LARP or ARG. However this beast is very very different from a game.

It is the differences that shed the light on how QAnon works and many of them are hard to see if you’re not involved in game development. QAnon is like the reflection of a game in a mirror, it looks just like one, but it is inverted.
[snip]
dO tHe ReSeaRcH

The fictional reason Q doesn’t just tell the world what they know is that Q wants you to “do your own research” and come to your own conclusions. How polite…

This is not a real reason. Q does not want you to come to your own conclusions. Q is feeding you conclusions. This is VERY important and here are several reasons why this is included in the verbiage of almost every fictional conspiracy theory ever.

1: Follow The Breadcrumbs

Telling people how and what they should think is the path of most resistance. Ideas that challenge us can do just the opposite of convincing us or enlightening us, but further engrain our old ideas. Even when presented with factual evidence.

“It is well known that people often resist changing their beliefs when directly challenged, especially when these beliefs are central to their identity1,2,3,4,5,6. In some cases, exposure to counterevidence may even increase a person’s confidence that his or her cherished beliefs are true7,8.”
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39589

Strongly held beliefs are literally a part of us. As such, attacks on core beliefs are treated very much as attacks on us, even as strongly as a physical attack.”

https://medium.com/curiouserinstitute/a-game-designers-analysis-of-qanon-580972548be5

---

He also describes how it works through guided apophenia. It’s a long but very interesting read.

If you are a Q believer, none of the above will change your mind. As the former Q believer said (first link, above):

---

“DB said that arguing with a QAnon adherent, especially online, is a waste of time—and their simple explanation for why makes perfect sense:

“I don’t think they can be reasoned out of beliefs they were not reasoned into.”

---

This information will only be useful to those of us who are not Q believers, help us better understand and sympathize with Q believers. It makes it easier to see how someone could easily get sucked into Q.

[gas_dr]

Yeah. That’s it. Everyone who disagrees with the more fringe position are bought off or evil. You do not see the slippery slope that argument sets up? Perhaps it is this type of commentary that is harming the overall platform by driving contributions down. Any sweeping statement like that is scary on its face. It is quite disturbing. It is as Mark Levin points out, the road to tyranny.

[gas_dr]

I am so glad you pointed this out. But I offer you this question. Do you ever notice how the opposition is beyond venomous in their attacks and sweeping statements accusing those with whom they disagree of criminal activity (miser, bribery, accepting bribes, fraud such as lying on published studies, conspiracy to commit murder and crimes against humanity to name a few) and yet they never respond to when in increasing frequency it is pointed out by many that they are in fact driving financial supporters away by their ongoing and unrelenting crusade to stop any and all debate?

I wish just one would have the guts to address this issue instead of ignoring snd deflecting. Of course, looking at one of the posts from the Q court jester, his entire position that withholding money is somehow communistic or Alinsky like. I find it rich that the entire theory of capitalism is that markets will determine offerings and continually find tune what is offered. The lack of understanding of capitalism is breath taking.

I know they don’t like data. But the data are that 2/3 of the way through current fundraising efforts for the quarter, donations as published are stagnant at 55%. Many freepers have spoken their feelings as to why. Clearly those supporting Q theory do not want to accept that they are the direct snd proximate cause of this. What’s even funnier is that having driven off those who are supporters, they apparently do not stand up to fill the gap they have created.

The silence on this is deafening. Because they cannot possibly speak to this issue. So expect more noise and bluster. But it is glaringly obvious what a large part of the issue is.