Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gas_dr
That is an excellent analysis. Add to it that one of the parts of Q theory is currently that real doctors say things on line and risk themselves while no one else who refuses to identify are credible.

You know better than to call that 'Q theory'.

All of these professionals whom Q theory hold out to be the only experts in the field have benefited financially greatly by their manipulations of social media.

It appears to me that based on your articles and info, Q theory trades on narcissistic group think. Tale as old as time.

No, 'Q theory', as you are now calling it, allows for exposure to alternate opinions, facts, and even reality other than what is presented to the world by the enemy. Its a 'think for yourself' kinda thing. But you know this.

Did VaxHerd slip something in your drink, or what? Who took over your account?


275 posted on 08/28/2022 9:41:20 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

It is Q theory. It is an accurate description of what is advanced by those who identify as Q members. It is also neither inflammatory nor derogatory. See…it is possible to make argument and remain in the rules of the forum.

And theory is exposed to testing and analysis. It appears to me that the theory advanced has some serious flaws in its construct.


286 posted on 08/28/2022 10:16:14 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson