Posted on 08/17/2022 11:05:30 AM PDT by Red Badger
Scientists have confirmed that last year, for the first time in the lab, they achieved a fusion reaction that self-perpetuates (instead of fizzling out) – bringing us closer to replicating the chemical reaction that powers the Sun.
However, they aren't exactly sure how to recreate the experiment.
Nuclear fusion occurs when two atoms combine to create a heavier atom, releasing a huge burst of energy in the process.
It's a process often found in nature, but it's very difficult to replicate in the lab because it needs a high-energy environment to keep the reaction going.
The Sun generates energy using nuclear fusion – by smashing hydrogen atoms together to create helium.
Supernovae – exploding suns – also leverage nuclear fusion for their cosmic firework displays. The power of these reactions is what creates heavier molecules like iron.
In artificial settings here on Earth, however, heat and energy tend to escape through cooling mechanisms such as x-ray radiation and heat conduction.
To make nuclear fusion a viable energy source for humans, scientists first have to achieve something called 'ignition', where the self-heating mechanisms overpower all the energy loss.
Once ignition is achieved, the fusion reaction powers itself.
In 1955, physicist John Lawson created the set of criteria, now known as the 'Lawson-like ignition criteria', to help recognize when this ignition took place.
Ignition of nuclear reactions usually happens inside extremely intense environments, such as supernova, or nuclear weapons.
Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's National Ignition Facility in California have spent over a decade perfecting their technique and have now confirmed that the landmark experiment conducted on 8 August 2021 did, in fact, produce the first-ever successful ignition of a nuclear fusion reaction.
In a recent analysis, the 2021 experiment was judged against nine different versions of Lawson's criterion.
"This is the first time we have crossed Lawson's criterion in the lab," nuclear physicist Annie Kritcher at the National Ignition Facility told New Scientist.
To achieve this effect, the team placed a capsule of tritium and deuterium fuel in the center of a gold-lined depleted uranium chamber and fired 192 high-energy lasers at it to create a bath of intense x-rays.
The intense environment generated by the inwardly directed shock waves created a self-sustaining fusion reaction.
Under these conditions, hydrogen atoms underwent fusion, releasing 1.3 megajoules of energy for 100 trillionths of a second, which is 10 quadrillion watts of power.
Over the past year, the researchers tried to replicate the result in four similar experiments, but only managed to produce half of the energy yield produced in the record-breaking initial experiment.
Ignition is highly sensitive to small changes that are barely perceptible, like the differences in the structure of each capsule and the intensity of the lasers, Kritcher explains.
"If you start from a microscopically worse starting point, it's reflected in a much larger difference in the final energy yield," says plasma physicist Jeremy Chittenden at Imperial College London. "The 8 August experiment was the best-case scenario."
The team now wants to determine what exactly is required to achieve ignition and how to make the experiment more resilient to small errors. Without that knowledge, the process cannot be scaled up to create fusion reactors that could power cities, which is the ultimate goal of this kind of research.
"You don't want to be in a position where you've got to get absolutely everything just right in order to get ignition," says Chittenden.
This article was published in Physical Review Letters.
Hate it when that happens...
Nobody seems to know what happened to Kaslin, but Red Badger, you’ve definitely taken her spot.
:)
The problem with fusion is, and has always been, that it requires more power to start and maintain it than you can get out of it. As someone once said, “fusion will always be achieved just ten or twenty years from now.”
Wait. What? This guy is a scientist?
That's how thing work in the real world, bunky.
I am honored to do so...........................😎
Like getting to the moon. 4k bytes 8-bit processor computers get us there, and today gigabyte processors with terabyte storage can't.
I think he meant that you want to achieve a place where it’s so common and conventional that it’s practically an afterthought, like turning the key in your car’s ignition to go to work.........................
Kaslin was a frustrated RINO.
“releasing 1.3 megajoules of energy for 100 trillionths of a second”
No.
releasing 1.3 megajoules of energy IN 100 trillionths of a second. Which is 100 picoseconds.
And it wasn’t 10 quadrillion watts, it was 13 quadrillion watts, or 13 terawatts.
Yes, but even then everything has to be “just right”.
Wait. What? This guy is a scientist?
That's how thing work in the real world, bunky.
I understood what he meant. Not the best articulation of his point. He meant they need to find a way to produce conditions to start fusion that does not require such strict tolerances.
That said, it seems that you almost need a traditional fission reaction for the ignition of a fusion reaction. LOL
Scientific experiments that nobody can duplicate have a name:
Magic!
It didn’t happen then.
Interesting. Her replies to me were often somewhat caustic.
When you can’t replicate an initial measurement after repeated tries, it’s time to question your first measurement.
Remember cold fusion?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.