Posted on 07/08/2022 3:08:06 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
In an excellent one-hour interview, Dr. Joseph Mercola and Dr. Ryan Cole discussed the surging cancer cases in correlation with these COVID jabs. Dr. Mercola relays that, for a while, cancer has been the number two cause of death in the United States and the Western world. He believes this is due to dietary changes “because prior to 1900, I think the incidence of cancer was a half to 1%, and now it’s 33% [of] people dying from cancers.”
But that’s another discussion because these jabs seem to be accelerating the process. Mercola asks Cole, “What do you think the timeline is going to be before it [this surge in cancer] gets out of control? Is it going to stabilize or just going to get much worse??
Dr. Cole states that he’s been speaking with many clinicians about what they are observing: “Many of their patients who have been cancer-free for three, four or five years, their pet scan looks great, no detectable disease. After that second or third shot, all of a sudden, they’re stage four disease like wildfire.”
Cole thinks the reason for this is because of immune-suppressive mechanisms and pleads that if you’ve had a couple of shots, please don’t take another because this is a “dose-dependent poisoning...”
(Excerpt) Read more at redvoicemedia.com ...
“for one of his well researched exposes.”
So, his global warming hysteria films are based upon this “research” and based upon the “facts” derived from it?
Prior to 1900 50 was a ripe old age. Cancer incidence increases with age.
I refused to even get flu shots the last couple of years. I didn’t trust what might have been in the syringes.
Really??? Hydrogen peroxide???? What an idiot
Correlation is not causation. Particularly in this case
those who were unable to get treatment in 2020 during the lockdown.
/\
Or regular check ups.
This happened to my brother, we just found out few weeks back.
Stage 4.
I’m livid.
Please send up a prayer for him.
I think you are right.
See my tag.
In honesty, cancer was much harder to detect back then until it was too late. Earlier diagnoses means more people *realize* they have cancer than their grandparents did.
Beat me to it. Also most people were not autopsied back then and many would have died of undiagnosed cancers that were called all sorts of things.
Just the fact that everything had to be and still is put off because of COVID hysteria STILL practiced by the so-called “heroes” in medical, undoubtedly led to much neglect of diagnosis.
I hate this COVID garbage and it is still going on with every single doctor office.
Clot me with your best shot!
I certainly hope Moore has been vaxed.
Sorry to hear that and I will be praying for your brother.
I’ve read that they’re going to start putting the mRNA crap in them. I think I’m done with flu shots also.
“In 1900 people died of a lot of other things before they got old enough to get cancer.”
That’s because they didn’t have vaccines to prevent the “other things”.
Got it on the second read. We lost a dear friend this way.
I never experienced any of that. My doctor's office has always been open to his patients and he never required anyone to wear a mask. There is no difference between my pre-Covid visits and post startup visits. My wife went to see him yesterday and he wasn't wearing a mask either.
Yea, after I hit post, I reread my comment, and thought,
That must be the longest convoluted sentence I have written in a long time. Glad you got my thought on the second read.
In the lat 15 years I started writing theological commentaries, and a couple pf my colleagues have told me that sometimes I write like St Paul, the king of run on sentences.
PING
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Stage 4 Cancers Taking Off Like Wildfire: “We’re Going to See a Consistent Two to Threefold Increase”, Owen wrote: “Dr. Mercola relays that, for a while, cancer has been the number two cause of death in the United States and the Western world. He believes this is due to dietary changes “because prior to 1900, I think the incidence of cancer was a half to 1%, and now it’s 33% [of] people dying from cancers.””
You see? Just a single quote like this lets one completely ignore whatever else he has to say.
Cancer is a disease mostly of old age. Pre 1900 people didn’t live to old age very often. So a breathless noting that 1/2 of 1% of people dying died of cancer pre 1900 is utterly meaningless.
Though he does have one thing right about diet. Those people age 78 in year 1899 didn’t have much of a diet, since they were already dead.
"Just a single quote like this lets one completely ignore whatever else he has to say." ~ Owen
Do you imagine us all halting in our tracks and turning away in unison, as you'd like us to do?
If you read the article, the context refutes your nonsense and so it's your quote which I placed in itallics which lets one completely ignore whatever else you have to say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.