Posted on 06/12/2022 11:27:34 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
[…]
Who’s deleting VAERS reports?
Peters interviews Albert Benavides, a Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) expert, data analyst and auditor, who’s been analyzing VAERS data since the release of these novel shots. According to Benavides, at least 10,000 reports of death or serious injury following COVID “vaccination” have vanished since the rollout of the shots – and they were not duplicate reports, which is a common “explanation” for their removal.
Benavides cites the case of a young child in Alaska who reportedly died after the jab. That death report is now gone, and there’s no other remaining report that matches it.
VAERS I.D. 1815096 is another example. This is the case of a 13-year-old girl in Maryland, who died 16 days after her first jab. This report was entered October 25, 2021, and deleted April 15, 2022. VAERS claims it was deleted because it was a duplicate, but there are no 13-year-old girls in Maryland who died anywhere else in VAERS.
According to Benavides, over the past 30 years, some 4,000 non-COVID reports have been deleted, and of those only a couple of hundred were deaths. For the COVID jab, VAERS is deleting a far higher proportion of severe injuries and deaths. About 2 percent of all COVID jab-related reports are deaths, and about 5 percent of death-related reports are being deleted…
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
The government can’t be trusted to collect, store, and report adverse health data. That needs to be done by private companies on redundant sites.
Says the guy who cites factcheck.org when it suits his emotional needs. /s
“Thanks Trump. Your Operation Warp Speed was a failure.”
How so? Many here at FR saw the writing on the wall and avoided the clot shots. We are all fine.
Trump had an impossible task, the only other response being the waging of war upon China since our own government is in bed with the globalists who facilitated this faux crisis.
I submit that we failed HIM.
Look in the mirror and reevaluate.
Answer: They are emotionally weak, intellectually shallow and the resultant fear-based rationale places them directly in bed with the leftists & globalists with whom we are at war.
It is analogous to a person being swept up and deposited in a 'reeducation center' who, upon release, thereupon parrots state propaganda, defends the state's actions and attacks those who have an opinion otherwise.
Sound familiar? I submit that anyone defending these jabs is no different than anyone supporting the hard left/antifa et al and merits the appropriate response.
In this forum I refer to them as CINO.
Instead as well, we have insane people managing our children's education and they are spending our money on promoting perversions and reinforcing the lifestyles of such who seriously contribute absolutely nothing towards the furtherance of our Culture, the betterment of our collective advancements, and the health and prosperity of our posterity.
LOL!!!!
;-)
btt
I didn’t know this:
“Only the initial VAERS reports are available to the public. Updated reports are only viewable internally. That means we have no way of knowing how many of those who were injured have since died from those injuries. This is a loophole that can make a vaccine appear less deadly than it actually is.”
I read early on, I believe it was part of the CDC’s website text about VAERS, that only the first or ‘initial’ report is entered into VAERS and there are no updates. In reality that was a lie like everything else coming out of the CDC; updates are only available to staff.
At the time, I wondered how the CDC used that to hide the truth. I noticed a strange number of young people in VAERS and those records were not then listed as adverse reaction, but they were recorded for having had the vax ‘too young’ or younger than Pfizer/Moderna and EUA guidelines. I theorized that maybe the policy of entering the ‘too young’ category of patients into VAERS, stating “No adverse reaction, patient too young” meant that given the CDC would not update the record, they were freeing themselves from the risk that young person would die or be injured and be recorded in VAERS. Hiding the young by entering them in VAERS ‘early’ after saying “No updates to VAERS”.
I also thought the ‘no updates’ policy listed on the VAERS website at the time hid countless deaths because some reports in VAERS were catastrophic but still alive during the writing of the report. For example, a man went through such an ordeal with repeated episodes in the ER of his heart stopping, and the record detailed grueling treatments used to stabilize him. The record concluded with his physician stressing it was important for him to still have the next ‘dose’ of the vaccine that almost killed him that night. I don’t know if he died the next day or with the second dose because....”no updates”.
There were many instances of people having ‘stroke like’ episodes. It appeared a brain clot formed long enough to cause stroke damage and then resolved before the CAT scan or other analysis was performed. I think that category may have been “cerebrovascular accident.” One woman was fine until the vax, rushed to the hospital for a harrowing course of emergency interventions, diagnosed ‘cerebrovascular accident’ and ‘stroke-like’ notes in the physician’s comments, and then transferred to the stroke ward. Again, no further update, but should we just assume that those who required extensive emergency intervention all lived happily ever after?
And now I read that, oh yes there are updates, but the public is not allowed to see them. Why? The CDC is so evil.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Dangers of COVID shots ‘deleted’ as thousands of injury, death reports go missing: Data analyst, entropy12 wrote: |
Almost 600 million jabs so far by Americans. |
*
This article helps explain more reasons why we don't know the exact number, but we are confident that so many died that the CDC and officials committed crimes to cover it up.
The damage by the 'vaccine' is not over, but is ongoing so the number of killed or injured is increasing and will continue to do so. Whatever percentage were injured as of today will be an undercount as the suffering unfurls over time.
You continue the strategy of the CDC. They hide the stats and sneer that we don't have data to support our concerns (data they hide from us) and therefore imply we're exaggerating, as our loved ones suffer and die.
The Washington Post is owned by Swamp Creature Jeff Bozo.
And this attack on those pushing back on the shots was discussed in detail, years ago, by Peter Hotez.
Who openly said that resistance to the shots comes Russia and from Trump supporters.
And recommended a supranational UN body to deal with “misinformation.”
Gee that sounds like a familiar theme from the left, doesn’t it?
Sod off troll.
And my cousin who died in his recliner several hours after he and his wife got their second shots. Wife was near death, but lived.
You did. You went mental.
Just a small comment on cancer.
Cancer does NOT happen suddenly.
My wife had 9 cancer tumors in various organs and zero symptoms. Then she had pain in ribs which just would not go away. They did X-ray and discovered a large mass in one lung. Then they did a PET scan and discovered those 9 tumors. That was 4 years and 3 months ago. Cancer is very sneaky and grows slowly.
She is fighting cancer with courage and we actually enjoyed 5 cruises since last September.
Please see my post near end of this thread.
Sorry I do not respond to low IQ people in context to your post.
Reading your posts, it is apparent to me that you are one on the few high IQ frequent posters on covid threads, and so I feel compelled to reply.
To make my post short I will summarize all my points I have posted in the past.
1. Yes, I agree, CDC undercounts adverse side effects from vaccines.
2. Same as when CDC was overcounting deaths from covid.
3. I never claimed covid vaccine are effective against covid. I have posted actual data from local hospital listing breakdown of vaxxed versus unvaxxed patients, but this data will be affected by percentages of such people in population at the snapshot time. If 99% of people in a town are unvaxxed, clearly majority of people admitted will be unvaxxed.
4. Vaccines do not and can not “protect” from virus infection, since no vaccine creates a virus proof filter in respiratory system. Only function of vaccines is to create additional tools such as anti-bodies to fight virus after it invades.
5. My only claim about the vaccines is they are less harmful than more harmful for adverse effects. I base it on four times Americans chose to get jabbed and I have not seen news reports of 3 million people falling dead from vaccines. That makes the vaccine at least 99% or more safe.
In my own case, 16 months after 1st jab and 3 more jabs later, I am 100% free of any adverse side effects from vaccines. Ans so is my spouse, my 2 adult kids and their spouses.
6. My conclusion based on overwhelming number of Americans chose to get the jabs is, people are more scared of covid than the vaccines.
7. I am glad no one is locked up in prison for refusing the jabs. Because I am against all federal mandates for health related matters. Everything should be voluntary.
8. Anyone who does not want the vaccine, please skip the vaccines. We can donate those excess doses to poorer countries.
9. I am against any lockdowns for healthy adults under age 60. Those people who have multiple health issues should be protected with guidance but without mandates.
10. I am against all mask mandates, including children.
OK, Boomer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.