I didn’t know this:
“Only the initial VAERS reports are available to the public. Updated reports are only viewable internally. That means we have no way of knowing how many of those who were injured have since died from those injuries. This is a loophole that can make a vaccine appear less deadly than it actually is.”
I read early on, I believe it was part of the CDC’s website text about VAERS, that only the first or ‘initial’ report is entered into VAERS and there are no updates. In reality that was a lie like everything else coming out of the CDC; updates are only available to staff.
At the time, I wondered how the CDC used that to hide the truth. I noticed a strange number of young people in VAERS and those records were not then listed as adverse reaction, but they were recorded for having had the vax ‘too young’ or younger than Pfizer/Moderna and EUA guidelines. I theorized that maybe the policy of entering the ‘too young’ category of patients into VAERS, stating “No adverse reaction, patient too young” meant that given the CDC would not update the record, they were freeing themselves from the risk that young person would die or be injured and be recorded in VAERS. Hiding the young by entering them in VAERS ‘early’ after saying “No updates to VAERS”.
I also thought the ‘no updates’ policy listed on the VAERS website at the time hid countless deaths because some reports in VAERS were catastrophic but still alive during the writing of the report. For example, a man went through such an ordeal with repeated episodes in the ER of his heart stopping, and the record detailed grueling treatments used to stabilize him. The record concluded with his physician stressing it was important for him to still have the next ‘dose’ of the vaccine that almost killed him that night. I don’t know if he died the next day or with the second dose because....”no updates”.
There were many instances of people having ‘stroke like’ episodes. It appeared a brain clot formed long enough to cause stroke damage and then resolved before the CAT scan or other analysis was performed. I think that category may have been “cerebrovascular accident.” One woman was fine until the vax, rushed to the hospital for a harrowing course of emergency interventions, diagnosed ‘cerebrovascular accident’ and ‘stroke-like’ notes in the physician’s comments, and then transferred to the stroke ward. Again, no further update, but should we just assume that those who required extensive emergency intervention all lived happily ever after?
And now I read that, oh yes there are updates, but the public is not allowed to see them. Why? The CDC is so evil.
A poster on Instapundit wrote:
So that Joe Biden does not accuse me of spreading disinformation, I link to a document created by the FDA to examine the safety and efficacy of a Moderna vaccine on children.
https://www.fda.gov/media/159157/download
Therein, you will find the Table 6. You will notice that, in the last two rows, vaccine effectiveness against Omicron in 2 -5 year olds was a pitiful 36.8% with a 95% confidence interval that bottoms out at 12.5%. For 6 -23 month old infants, a 50.6% VE is claimed with a 95% confidence interval that bottoms out at 21.4%. (This is the BEST VE these lying bastards can claim with their rigged trials.)
Of course, we all know that effectiveness against infection will only go lower from there. The randomized, blinded median followup for the 2-5 year olds and 6 -23 month olds was only about 70 days. I swear I am not making this up. See Table 4.
I think the medical profession is lost.