Posted on 02/03/2022 12:53:44 PM PST by ransomnote
ransomnote: The Expose is over the target and taking flak, banned and censored - even Paypal turned against them in an effort to deprive them of funding. Please pray that the Expose receive the funds it needs to keep serving the public.
A lawsuit filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency produced documents from Pfizer revealing that its Covid-19 vaccine caused all of the pregnant women in its trial to miscarry.
The report, titled “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports,” describes events reported up to February 2021 and shows that not a single pregnant woman who took the Pfizer vaccine delivered a live baby.
Table 6 of the report, titled “Missing Information,” reveals under the first topic of “Use in pregnancy and lactation” the following statement:
“Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).
This suggests that of 270 pregnancies, there were 23 spontaneous abortions, five “outcomes pending,” two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one normal outcome. However, there is also that tricky statement: “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”
One outlet reported: “We have no idea what happened with 243 (5 + 238) of the pregnancies of these injected women; they have just not been included in the report.
“What we do know is that of 27 reported pregnancies (270 subtract 243), there are 28 dead babies! This appears to mean that someone was pregnant with twins and that 100 percent of the unborn babies died.”
It is possible that the five “outcomes pending” may have resulted in a normal and healthy delivery, but this remains unclear. This means, that at best, 87.5 percent of babies within fully vaccinated wombs died as opposed to 100 percent.
Regardless, this is still an incredibly horrific and disgusting outcome. No babies should be dying as a result of these “safe and effective” vaccines, and no mother should be harmed in the process.
Pfizer sneakily attempted to cover this up with an article titled “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine,” which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on Dec. 31, 2020.
And?
Is that somehow supposed to show that increased miscarriage is not happening among vaxxed women?
My post was responding to the original poster, who claimed that ALL pregnant women who were vaccinated miscarried. This is known to me to be false.
There are two large databases, one in Israel and one in Norway, that show SAB rates equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Third trimester women are at greatly increased risk of severe morbidity from COVID.
But my post was simply to refute the claim that ALL pregnant women miscarried. This is simply not true.
You are wrong, again. I want you to SKIP the jabs. So that we can donate your vaccine quota to poorer countries.
...except...23 out of 270 are reported, by THEIR OWN STUDIES as miscarriages...that’s near 10%.
Isn’t that alone bad enough to get heads screwed on straight?
I guess not.
Remember...ALL previous vaccine trials ceased at 50 deaths. YET...these pharmaceutical companies reported IN THEIR OWN STUDIES TO HAVE 1200 deaths in the first few months.
...and...AND... we’re missing the data on 243 of the pregnancies. Could be much much worse.
Kinda makes ya wonder why the harmaceutical companies don’t want to release the trial data for 75 years, long after were gone?
Amazing how very basic numbers, math and simple logic escapes the brainwashed. Some people will NEVER wake upand it’s sad.
..that is all
...ergo...kill the messenger is the only option!
I’m sorry, that’s terrible. Did she attribute it to the vaccine?
I certainly don’t think the vax is a death jab for everyone, even for unborn children. What I do think, however, is that the occurrences of such are abnormal - abnormal to the extent that in a proper FDA approval test over years would result in a kickback of the vax tests and a complete rework. That’s why I think the attempts to hide all this approval data dragged out over 75 years is so important to unravel. I think there has been some seriously criminal actions going on with it.
So what, in your high and mighty esteem, is the acceptable percentage of deformed babies in medical experimental injections is suitable for your eugenics minds?
...and would you knowingly subject your children to that suitable risk.
...nobody cares until it’s THEIR OX being gored
Thalidomide’s approval was prevented in the U.S. by one woman:Frances Oldham Kelsey.
Except for the fact that we've had hundreds of thousands and probably millions of successful births by vaccinated women.
Talk about your inconvenient truths.
As if truth and Daily Expose could coexist on the same thread.
No, the doctors did not.
I don’t think they have either. At least they didn’t mention it to me.
Explosive info.
I think you must have misunderstood my post. Or maybe it was misdirected.
Re: 38 - The “Daily Expose” is known for click bait headlines. They’re hack journalists that have pushed many headlines that are clearly incorrect in order to generate page views.
So....they are exactly like the MSM. And the CDC...
Well, not quite like the MSM. At least the MSM lists the name of the story authors. The “Daily Expose” rarely if ever lists the name of story authors. That’s relevant when the story is of dubious accuracy.
I may have.
Pardon me
Yes, exactly like the MSM. The MSM is just one "anonymous source" after another, and of dubious accuracy.
The devil is in the details.
Based on the evidence outlined above, most authorities agree that pregnant women [42] should be included in the priority populations for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination [53]. Although safety data are rapidly accumulating in pregnancy registries for a small number of widely deployed vaccines [54] and that several studies of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine use in pregnancy are on-going, we are not aware of any human trials that have demonstrated fetal and neonatal safety with any COVID-19 vaccines. The data currently available from animal developmental and reproductive toxicity studies are also very limited but have not suggested any safety concerns with regards to female fertility, fetal, embryonal, or postnatal development [13,32].
The bold is my addition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.