Skip to comments.New Scientific Study finds that the Covid-19 Vaccines are causing a new form of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Posted on 01/30/2022 1:50:08 PM PST by ransomnote
ransomnote: The Expose is over the target and taking flak, banned and censored - even Paypal turned against them in an effort to deprive them of funding. Please pray that the Expose receive the funds it needs to keep serving the public.
A new scientific study conducted by Dr Peter Mccullough and other leading scientists has concluded that the Covid-19 vaccines are damaging the innate immune system, supporting evidence published by The Expose over the last few months that the fully vaccinated are developing some new form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome induced by the Covid-19 injections.
The study titled ‘Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs‘ was published on the 21st Jan 22, and presents a raft of evidence that the genetic modifications introduced by the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines have diverse consequences to human health.
These include but are not limited to –
Dr Peter Mccullough, who conducted the study alongside Dr Anthony Kyriakopoulos, Dr Greg Nigh, and Dr Stephenie Sennef, also provides evidence from adverse event reports made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to support their conclusions.
The group of scientists explore in their paper the scientific literature which suggests that vaccination with a Covid-19 mRNA vaccine initiates a set of biological events that are not only different from those induced by natural infection but are in several ways counter-productive to both short and long term immune system performance and normal cellular function.
Mccullough and co. also state that the Covid-19 injections have now been shown to “down regulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis. They introduce into the body highly modified genetic material”.
The following are some of the highlights in the extremely well researched and incredibly long study.
The study references a seminal paper by a research team in India that investigated the role of exosomes in the cellular response to internally synthesised SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
They wrote in the abstract: – “We propose that SARS-CoV-2 gene product, Spike, is able to modify the host exosomal cargo, which gets transported to distant uninfected tissues and organs and can initiate a catastrophic immune cascade within the Central Nervous System (CNS).
The immune system and the DNA repair system are the two primary systems that higher organisms rely on for defense against diverse threats, and they share common elements.
Loss of function of key DNAr epair proteins leads to defects in repair that inhibit the production of functional B and T cells, resulting in immunodeficiency. Impaired DNA repair is also a direct pathway towards cancer.
Mccullough and co. reference a seminal study conducted by researchers in Shanghai, China which monitored several parameters associated with immune function in a cohort of patients before, and 28 days after Covid-19 vaccination.
The authors found consistent alteration of gene expression following vaccination in many diﬀerent immune cell types.
“Together, these data suggested that after vaccination, at least by day 28, other than generation of neutralizing antibodies, people’s immune systems, including those of lymphocytesand monocytes, were perhaps in a more vulnerable state.”
These authors also identiﬁed disturbing changes in gene expression that would imply impaired ability to repair DNA.
Immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disorder, where the immune system attacks circulating blood platelets.
Platelets normally circulate with an average lifespan of only ﬁve to nine days, so they are constantly synthesised in the bone marrow and cleared in the spleen.
The study authors write that fully one third of the body’s total platelets are found in the spleen. Since the mRNA vaccines are carried into the spleen by immune cells initially attracted to the injection site in thearm muscle, there is tremendous opportunity for the release of spike-protein-containing exosomes by vaccine-infected macrophages in the spleen.
Therefore, exosomes released by macrophages that are compelled by the vaccine to synthesise spike protein, act to increase the risk of thrombocytopenia in response to immune complexes formed by spike antigen and antibodies produced against the spike.
Over the 31-year history of VAERS, there were a total of 9,153 deaths reported in association with any vaccine, and 7,114 (78%) of those deaths were linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
Importantly, only 14% of VAERS-reported deaths as of June 2021 could have vaccination ruled out as a cause. This strongly suggests that these unprecedented vaccines exhibit unusual mechanisms of toxicity that go well beyond what is seen with traditional vaccines.
A shocking 96% of all cases linking Bell’s palsy to any vaccine since 1990 were linked to COVID-19 vaccines (3,197 out of 3,331 cases). There were 760 reports of Guillain Barr´e Syndrome (GBS) for COVD-19 vaccines. Over 100 cases of optic neuritis or optic neuropathy were listed. A total of 8,298 reports linked migraine headache to COVID-19.
There were also 52 cases of Herpes zoster oticus linked to COVID-19 vaccines. This is basically a case of herpes aﬀecting the cranial nerves near the ears. Hearing loss is a characteristic symptom of Herpes zoster oticus, and it can become permanent.
As of November 19, 2021, there were 12,204 cases where ”tinnitus” was mentioned. Deafness is of course much more serious and therefore less common, and yet it also has a striking number of hits, coming in at 2,662 cases.
There were 653 VAERS reports linking the COVID-19 vaccines to thrombocytopenia. This is to be compared with 774 cases reported for all the other vaccines over the 31-year period from 1990 to 2021.
The VAERS database also includes many terms related to liver dysfunction, and there were around 2,000 reportsin VAERS for various liver-related terms linked to COVID-19 vaccines, such as hepatomegaly (73 cases), hepatic steatosis (105 cases) hepatic enzyme increased (338 cases), liver disorder (71 cases), liver injury (44cases), hepatic pain (91 cases) and hepatitis (62 cases).
There were 4,650 cases with dysphagia, 1,697 cases of dysphonia, and 37,132 cases of dyspnea in reaction to COVID vaccines. As reviewed in Mccullough and co’s. study, a likely cause is vagus nerve damage due to inﬂammation induced by exposure to exosomes containing the spike protein and the associated microRNAs.
The following table taken from the study shows the number of events in the VAERS database from 1990 to 12th Dec 2021, where several terms indicating cancer occurred in asociation with Covid-19 vaccine or with all other vailable vaccines, along with the ratio between the two counts.
There were three times as many reports of breast cancer following a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than six times the number of reports of B-cell lymphoma. All but one of the cases of follicular lymphomawere associated with COVID-19 vaccines.
Pancreatic carcinoma was more than three times as high. Mccullough and co. state that this cannot be explained by reference to a disproportionately large number of people receiving an mRNAvaccination in the past year compared to all other vaccinations.
The total number of people receiving a non-COVID-19 vaccination is unknown, but over the 31 years history of reports VAERS contains it is unquestionably many orders of magnitude larger than the number receiving an mRNA vaccination in the past year.
Overall, in the above table, twice as many cancer reports to VAERS are related to a COVID-19vaccination compared to those related to all other vaccines. That, in the study authors opinions constitutes a signal in urgent need of investigation.
Dr Peter Mccullough, Dr Anthony Kyriakopoulos, Dr Greg Nigh, and Dr Stephenie Sennef conclude their study by calling attention to three very important aspects of the safety profile of the Covid-19 vaccines.
The authors of the study state that “
“Should any of these potentials be fully realised, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces”.
The final statement from Mccullough, Kyriakopoulos, Nigh, and Sennef in their study reads as follows –
“In the end, we are not exaggerating to say that billions of lives are at stake. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly. Until our public health institutions do what is right in this regard, we encourage all individuals to make their own health care decisions with this information as a contributing factor in those decisions”.
3, 2, 1...
Oops a space 🤠
Snopes will come out with this: “This has been debunked because we say it has been...”
Dr Gasbag and his Gasettes will be here soon.
“Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome”
I thought it was globull warming that caused aids?
Having had an advanced B-cell lymphoma 16 years ago, that is the reason I refuse this vaccine. Damn near killed me then, I will not risk it again. Yet no doctors opinion will override the medical exemption process. It’s safe and effective dontcha know. So it’s be fired or role the dice. I chose to be fired at some date in the future. Apparently I have no say in my medical treatment with an experimental genetic modifications serum. Vax mandate supporters need to be shot imho. They want me to take unacceptable risks, meet lead poisoning for you unacceptable risks.
I dunno about this, but I can see where giving covid man-made unnatural hoops to jump through via the so-called vaccines could lead to some nasty mutations of the covid variety.
And, I bet the next claim will be AIDS cocktails won't work to prevent the vaccine-induced version.
Predict for everyone how many will die.
So I can get AIDS now without having a d*ck shoved up my arse?
At least here in CA I can intentionally and secretly infect anyone I want with AIDS without worry of prosecution, so I got that going for me, which is nice.
Never fear, the vaccine is here 🙄 https://abcnews-go-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/moderna-launches-clinical-trial-hiv-vaccine-mrna-technology/story?amp_js_v=a6&_gsa=1&id=82510807&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16435814342331&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FHealth%2Fmoderna-launches-clinical-trial-hiv-vaccine-mrna-technology%2Fstory%3Fid%3D82510807
Will you receive total consciousness on your death bed?
Thank you. And after reading that , can anybody wonder why after going thru treatment for AML leukemia why I want nothing to do with this frankenvax.
I got this from a friend yesterday....
The UK government admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-vaccinated. The UK government has admitted that once you have been double-vaccinated, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity to Covid variants - or possibly any other virus. So let’s watch the “real” pandemic begin now! In its Week 42 “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report”, the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination”. It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially permanent. What does this mean? We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaccinated adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated ones). The British now find that the vaccine interferes with the body’s ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus. In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. In the long term, the vaccinated are far more susceptible to any mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more. The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once. Source:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf
The first insurance companies are backing down because a huge wave of claims is coming their way. Anthony Fauci confirms that the PCR test cannot detect live viruses. Anthony Fauci confirms that neither the antigen test nor the PCR test can tell us whether someone is contagious or not!!! This invalidates all the foundations of the so-called pandemic. The PCR test was the only indication of a pandemic. Without PCR-TEST no pandemic For all the press workers, doctors, lawyers, prosecutors etc. THIS is the final key, the ultimate proof that the measures must all be lifted immediately must be PLEASE SHARE
You hear that, Neil Young?
I am not convinced it will cause full blown aids. Creating a vaccine that does what your immune system normally does, overtime, could cause it to atrophy and unable to function properly with out instruction (another dose of vaccine). Guaranteed repeat customers.
“THEY” who invented, tested and push the vaxx are certainly a huge target. BOMBS AWAY..... Sink that ship full of shi’ite.
AIDS versus CV19 vaccines was questioned in October 2021 post.
Are Covid ‘Vaccines’ Giving People AIDS? Immune System Functions Are Dropping Around 5% EACH WEEK in Those Who Were Vaccinated (10.17.21)
The non-FR page referenced in post above references another non-FR article from December 2020.
COVID-19 vaccines may increase the risk of HIV infections (12.23.2020)
Everybody who has taken a CV19 vaccine was properly warned about this alleged problem according to part (II) of EUA law, right? Also properly warned about alternative remedies for CV19 according to part (III) of EUA law, right?
From related thread...
To begin with, people have probably been getting mixed, disturbing messages about alleged problems with experimental CV19 mRNA jabs. So people are understandably taking a caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) stance on getting jabbed, especially where harassment for not getting a jab is concerned.
Study Reveals That Unjabbed Are Better Informed Than Jabbed (12.27.21)
The Nuremberg Code, ‘Informed Consent’ and Vaccine Mandates (11.10.21)
“People Are Genuinely Trying To Make An Informed Decision” – Why Vaccine Giveaways & “Freebies” Don’t Work (8.11.21)
Can The Government Inject Anything Into Our Veins Without Our informed Consent (7.29.21)
MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated' (7.17.21)
Next, the EUA law, probably unconstitutional imo, mandates, in part (II), that we should have been officially informed about things like possible spike protein problems and other alleged concerns before getting jab, due process counseling arguably ignored by many pro-vax talking heads.
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (excerpted)
"(e) Conditions of authorization(1) Unapproved product(A) Required conditions(i)...
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—(I) that the Secretary [Secretary of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks [emphases added]."
Also, note that part (III) of EUA requires that people be informed of other possible remedies before choosing whether or not to get jab.
Finally, as a consequence of what is seemingly growing evidence of poorly planned, poorly executed, alleged vote counting fraud by Democrats to steal 2020 elections, Democrats had arguably destroyed their credibility concerning election before they took over management of government-promoted jabs, foolishly bullying everybody to get jabbed. So a growing number of people understandably aren't “buying” what Democrats are trying to “sell” them concerning election or jabs imo.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.