PING
3, 2, 1...
Oops a space đ¤
Dr Gasbag and his Gasettes will be here soon.
“Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome”
I thought it was globull warming that caused aids?
Having had an advanced B-cell lymphoma 16 years ago, that is the reason I refuse this vaccine. Damn near killed me then, I will not risk it again. Yet no doctors opinion will override the medical exemption process. Itâs safe and effective dontcha know. So itâs be fired or role the dice. I chose to be fired at some date in the future. Apparently I have no say in my medical treatment with an experimental genetic modifications serum. Vax mandate supporters need to be shot imho. They want me to take unacceptable risks, meet lead poisoning for you unacceptable risks.
I dunno about this, but I can see where giving covid man-made unnatural hoops to jump through via the so-called vaccines could lead to some nasty mutations of the covid variety.
And, I bet the next claim will be AIDS cocktails won't work to prevent the vaccine-induced version.
Predict for everyone how many will die.
So I can get AIDS now without having a d*ck shoved up my arse?
Progress!
At least here in CA I can intentionally and secretly infect anyone I want with AIDS without worry of prosecution, so I got that going for me, which is nice.
Thank you. And after reading that , can anybody wonder why after going thru treatment for AML leukemia why I want nothing to do with this frankenvax.
I got this from a friend yesterday....
Booooommmmm
ďżź
The UK government admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-vaccinated. The UK government has admitted that once you have been double-vaccinated, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity to Covid variants - or possibly any other virus. So let’s watch the “real” pandemic begin now! In its Week 42 “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report”, the UK Department of Health admits on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination”. It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially permanent. What does this mean? We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaccinated adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated ones). The British now find that the vaccine interferes with the body’s ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus. In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. In the long term, the vaccinated are far more susceptible to any mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more. The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once. Source:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf
The first insurance companies are backing down because a huge wave of claims is coming their way. Anthony Fauci confirms that the PCR test cannot detect live viruses. Anthony Fauci confirms that neither the antigen test nor the PCR test can tell us whether someone is contagious or not!!! This invalidates all the foundations of the so-called pandemic. The PCR test was the only indication of a pandemic. Without PCR-TEST no pandemic For all the press workers, doctors, lawyers, prosecutors etc. THIS is the final key, the ultimate proof that the measures must all be lifted immediately must be PLEASE SHARE
You hear that, Neil Young?
“THEY” who invented, tested and push the vaxx are certainly a huge target. BOMBS AWAY..... Sink that ship full of shi’ite.
AIDS versus CV19 vaccines was questioned in October 2021 post.
Are Covid âVaccinesâ Giving People AIDS? Immune System Functions Are Dropping Around 5% EACH WEEK in Those Who Were Vaccinated (10.17.21)
The non-FR page referenced in post above references another non-FR article from December 2020.
COVID-19 vaccines may increase the risk of HIV infections (12.23.2020)
Everybody who has taken a CV19 vaccine was properly warned about this alleged problem according to part (II) of EUA law, right? Also properly warned about alternative remedies for CV19 according to part (III) of EUA law, right?
From related thread...
To begin with, people have probably been getting mixed, disturbing messages about alleged problems with experimental CV19 mRNA jabs. So people are understandably taking a caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) stance on getting jabbed, especially where harassment for not getting a jab is concerned.
Study Reveals That Unjabbed Are Better Informed Than Jabbed (12.27.21)
The Nuremberg Code, âInformed Consentâ and Vaccine Mandates (11.10.21)
Can The Government Inject Anything Into Our Veins Without Our informed Consent (7.29.21)
MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated' (7.17.21)
Next, the EUA law, probably unconstitutional imo, mandates, in part (II), that we should have been officially informed about things like possible spike protein problems and other alleged concerns before getting jab, due process counseling arguably ignored by many pro-vax talking heads.
21 U.S. Code § 360bbbâ3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (excerpted)
"(e) Conditions of authorization(1) Unapproved product(A) Required conditions(i)...(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informedâ
(I) that the Secretary [Secretary of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks [emphases added]."
Also, note that part (III) of EUA requires that people be informed of other possible remedies before choosing whether or not to get jab.
Finally, as a consequence of what is seemingly growing evidence of poorly planned, poorly executed, alleged vote counting fraud by Democrats to steal 2020 elections, Democrats had arguably destroyed their credibility concerning election before they took over management of government-promoted jabs, foolishly bullying everybody to get jabbed. So a growing number of people understandably aren't âbuyingâ what Democrats are trying to âsellâ them concerning election or jabs imo.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Those are all identifiable by who added them, btw.
Really, at some point, don't you have to demand satisfaction?
"Me or them!" Try it out, see how it goes. Should go really well.
I'm ready for all of these smug leftists who want to shame/bully/mandate me into taking the clot shot to suffer the consequences of their sacred vaxx.
We know. it’s been called ADE (Antibody-Dependent Enhancement) since last year
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34579572/
bookmarked
VAIDS
No kidding. /sarc
Bump