PCR-Test-Risk-Analysis-BergholzDownload
Posted on 01/29/2022 8:27:28 AM PST by ransomnote
ransomnote: The Expose is over the target and taking flak, banned and censored - even Paypal turned against them in an effort to deprive them of funding. Please pray that the Expose receive the funds it needs to keep serving the public.
Parents, please read so you are armed with additional information to enable you to protect your children.
Ethylene oxide is highly toxic – it causes cancer, it damages DNA – and it is found on the Covid test swabs. Although Governments, public health officials and educators are responsible for investigating, raising public awareness and stopping the use of these tests on children, until that happens, society has a responsibility to protect the vulnerable.
In the text below we highlight the work of Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz who has researched the test sticks or swabs used by the population for Covid tests.
Prof. Bergholz is a former professor of electrical engineering with a focus on quality and risk management at the Jakobs University in Bremen. Before his appointment, Prof. Bergholz worked for 17 years in chip production management at Siemens.
In the short video below, he explained results from examining test swabs in the laboratory and the ethylene oxide (EO”) that was found.
If the video above is removed from YouTube you can watch it HERE.
ransomnote: I transcribed the English subtitles and captured some images from the 3 minute video linked above and posted it as a separate thread on FR here.
During Session 86 of the Corona Investigative Committee, Prof. Bergholz began by discussing ‘What Determines a “Limit to Growth”?’, a class Cynthia Chung gave for the symposium “The Earth Next 100 Years”. He focused on “nuclear power as an unlimited CO2-free resource” warning of the dangers and limitations of atomic energy compared to other forms of renewable energy. He also recommended some decentralised, or off grid, energy solutions.
At timestamp 31:25 he discussed the falsification of documents in the 30 December 2021 weekly Covid report from the Robert Koch Institut (“RKI”).
Beginning at 39:52 mins Prof. Bergholz discussed the EO scandal. It is at this point that the link to the video below joins the session.
“By accident I stumbled on these [swab] sticks that says EO on them. I looked into this and I found ethylene oxide which is anything else but a harmless gas,” Prof. Bergholz said, “if they are gassed, then it is sure that residues of ethylene oxide are on the test sample sticks and the swabs.”
Prof. Bergholz documented his research: ‘Risk analysis Implementation of rapid Covid-19 tests and through PCR tests’. The document is in German but we have translated it, using Google translate, and attached a copy of the English translation below.
ransomnote: You may read the full document in English on the Expose article webpage, or download it using the Expose's link below the following image.
His document begins: “The rapid antigen tests contain gold nanoparticles and in at least one case a chemical that has not been approved in Europe and has now received an exemption. All of these substances are harmful to health and the environment. All package inserts for rapid tests that have been examined to date contain chemicals that are hazardous to health. A spit test is based on carbon nanotubes, also a nanomaterial that is fundamentally subject to the European REACH chemicals regulation.”
All swabs that Prof. Bergholz analysed contained the carcinogenic and mutagenic substance EO, 50 times the amount of EO than is permitted.
Sometimes food stuffs are, illegally, gassed with EO to increase the “sell-by-date” because it is less expensive than other sterilising methods. There is a requirement of the Federal Institute of Risk Assessment regarding EO found in food stuffs: as soon as it has been proved that EO is present, the food has to be thrown away. This would also apply to anything that is inserted into the body.
In addition to chemicals found on the swabs, pieces of the swabs break off. “They clearly leave parts in the body that is unacceptable,” Prof. Bergholz said, “and this again is hard to understand that the authorities ‘push the rod along’, really, and don’t do anything.”
Prof. Bergholz has been pointing out for about six months that there is a health risk to using these tests but no action has been taken. The only response so far has been to mark test swabs as sterilised by radiation, “R”. The swabs that are marked as sterilised by radiation does not seem a credible claim, said Prof. Bergholz.
Sterilising medical devices with radiation, cobolt-60, is laborious, time consuming, requires certain dosages and facilities that can perform the procedure. This is why he feels the “R” claim is unlikely to be true and they are, in reality, using another sterilisation method, EO, for test swabs even when it is labelled “R”.
Ethylene oxide is highly toxic – it causes cancer, it damages DNA – and it is found on the Covid test swabs.
Click on the image below to follow the link to the video on Odysee.
You can watch the full, almost 7-hour, Corona Investigative Committee Session 86, ‘The Fog is Lifting’ HERE. Details of all the participants and the topics covered can be found HERE.
PING
Here’s sumthin that doesn’t add up: A spit test uses carbon nanotubes. It’s kind of a ‘so what’ situation. The test swab itself which comes into contact with the human is a cotton Q-tip. What does it matter if the test uses toxic chemicals or nanotubes? Those processes take place outside the human body.
For the $hot $hills too lazy to look up REAL PROF. DR. WERNER BERGHOLZ’ bio....
17 years of industrial experience with technical and business responsibilities – 21 years in academia – 23 years in national and international standardization organizations.
OCCUPATION (excerpt)
October 2015 – today: Partner at ISC International Standards Consulting GmbH & Co. KG, Gehrden, Germany
September 2001 – June 2015 Professor of Electrical Engineering at Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
Research Topics microelectronic, photovoltaics, quality engineering, standardization
Official retirement 2015
October 1985 – August 2001: Siemens Semiconductor Division / Infineon Technologies
EDUCATION
April 1975: Diploma from Göttingen University Germany in Semiconductor Physics
July 1978: Dr. rer. nat. from Göttingen University Germany in Semiconductor Physics
I’d rather get a blood test. Don’t they do that?
We deal with EO and its residuals all the time at work. There are defined limits for all. If there are appreciable amounts the swabs should not be sold. They are non-conforming and would generate a recall. It’s the manufacturer’s responsibility to ensure regulatory compliance when each lot is released.
Can you read?
From the article: "Ethylene oxide is highly toxic – it causes cancer, it damages DNA – and it is found on the Covid test swabs.
The test swab enters your nose, is rubbed against the nasal mucosa (which has a rich blood supply), removed and then subject to the Covid-19 test.
I may remind you that this is why cocaine users "inhale" cocaine into the nasal chambers for rapid access to the users' systemic circulation.
It sounds a lot to me like they’re looking at the test swabs AFTER they have been tested.
They’re just Q-tips. Replaceable by ordinary q-tips if one is that paranoid.
I got a PCR test last Monday (it was negative) but I still feel where they did the test up in my nasal cavity. It feels like a cigarette burn.
They are not ordinary Q-tips. The cotton swab (which looks like it is 10" long long so as to probe the deepest recesses of your nasal chamber) comes in a test tube package to which it will be returned before sending it off for analysis.
The cotton swab cannot be replaced by an ordinary Q-tip.
How you ever had a Covid-19 test?
Yes I have had a test and it was an ordinary Q-tip.
An ordinary Q-tip is not long enough to reach the deepest recesses of the nasal chamber (the nasopharynx) which is what the test requires.
My test swab was about 2” long. If one is paranoid about this then they can add their own cotton swab to their own long length of wood.
Wanna bet they won't allow that?
Cotton swab that they provide is part of a kit. Their swab is sterile and isolated in a sealed test tube to which it is returned.
I’ve never trusted the swabs they use. At first I figured it was a tool to collect DNA from as many people as possible for a hideous database.
Then I wondered why they wouldn’t plant something in a person using this tool. Of course they would oyf they could. And they can.
I’ll bet, if you allow the bet to include that <5” ordinary cotton swabs are what constitute the test now.
Not interested in taking your money.
Go to youtube and search PCR test. Quite a few videos will pop up. Look at one or two or all for that matter. I chose this one because of the definitive graphics.
Go look at all if you wish and then come back on this board and tell me again that an ordinary Q-tip can be used. As well, look at the length of the cotton swab used and tell me it is the “size” of a Q-tip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akiXEfWW-V0&t=175s&ab_channel=TheGuardian
No. You only need to put it in 1/2 - 1 inch.
Not interested in taking your money.
***Then why did ya say “wanna bet?”
Go to youtube and search PCR test.
***No thank you.
Quite a few videos will pop up.
***Good for them.
Look at one or two or all for that matter.
***No thank you. You do your homework, I’ll do mine.
I chose this one because of the definitive graphics.
***I tested with what was available at the time.
Go look at all
***Again, no thank you. You go and fetch, yourself.
if you wish and then come back on this board
***Again. Do your own homework. Go ahead. Fetch.
and tell me again that an ordinary Q-tip can be used.
***I used an ordinary Q-tip. An ordinary Q-tip was used. An ordinary Q-tip can be used.
As well, look at the length of the cotton swab used and tell me it is the “size” of a Q-tip.
***As well, do your own homework but by that time there won’t be any “pandemic” with a 99.7% survivability rating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akiXEfWW-V0&t=175s&ab_channel=TheGuardian
***https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUSwucLOWqM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
