Posted on 01/24/2022 4:08:17 AM PST by MtnClimber
The vaccines are proving to be a constantly moving target. Two shots will save us. No, three will. No, better make it four. Heck, let’s just keep it open-ended but you better get shots if you want to work, shop, eat out, go to a concert, maybe even board a plane. But what happens to this manic shot regime when we’re beginning to get data showing that, not only do the shots not prevent people from getting COVID (which is the traditional effect of a vaccine) but that they may actually leave people more vulnerable to COVID?
Israel, which was so terrified of having COVID shut it down, thereby leaving it vulnerable to the genocidal organizations and nations around it, embarked upon the most aggressive vaccination program in the world. Now, it’s the nation with the world’s highest per capita COVID rate, per a weekend report:
Israel recorded 69,201 new coronavirus cases in the past 24 hours, according to an update to the Health Ministry's website on Friday.
SNIP
None of that, though, addresses the newest, most concerning information about the vaccines: What if it turns out that they’re not even a therapeutic? What if you get more sick, not less sick, from the vaccination? Data out of Scotland suggests that this is a real possibility:
Scottish data shows that the COVID-19 age-standardized case rate is highest among the two-dose vaccinated and lowest among unvaccinated! It further shows this trend of negative efficacy for the double-vaccinated persisting for hospitalizations and deaths. Something is very wrong here, and together with other data points, it raises concerning questions about the negative effect of waning antibodies, constant boosting, and the consequences of a leaky vaccine with narrow-spectrum suboptimal antibodies against an ever-evolving virus.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Well, that would be counter to what we are being sold by the perpetual liars! Does the VAX suppress the immune system? There have been reports of this in the past, but little data. And no data that I have seen to back up the .gov reports that the VAX will make infections less severe.
ADE?
My 55 year old son....vaccinated and double boosted...and he still caught it.
The writer is the same one who, just yesterday, was trying to advance the “100,000 people over age 124 voted in Wisconsin in 2020” silliness.
Vax harder, retards. That much sooner that the world will be rid of your stupidity, weakness, and fecklessness. In the meantime, leave those with sense enough to actually ask questions and see this entire fraud for what it is, alone (that means, no “vaccine” mandates or “vaccine”-based restrictions of any kind).
.
At this point it’s a race for pride.
Since most are triple vaxxed at least, might as well keep digging deeper.
They can’t be reasoned with either.
Waiting for the democrat/media/big pharma/Faux-xi cheerleaders on here to say the death serum is perfectly safe with 98% efficacy on here.
What’s the counter to that story?
That does not mean that these people ACTUALLY voted. What it suggests is that people may have had access to the voter rolls and may have been creating votes for people who did not vote in the election. That is one of the ways dead people appear to vote.
The same sort of thing has been found in Arizona where the voter roll list of voters was used to canvas the addresses and ask people if they voted (or if 10 people at their address voted) and the results showed a 30% disagreement between votes cast and people who say that they did vote.
Re: Age 124 silliness...
Is it silly true?
Or, silly false?
“Re: Age 124 silliness...
Is it silly true?
Or, silly false?”
***************************
It’s silly false:
https://elections.wi.gov/node/7516
And it distracts from the actual 2020 VOTE FRAUD WHICH WAS BOTH REAL AND MASSIVE!
See post 13.
“What if you get more sick, not less sick, from the vaccination?”
It would not surprise me. These shots are doing something to the body’s immune system.
That was: first registered to vote in 1918, (had to be 21 back then). The folĺow up fact check said that nobody voted that was not registered.... an obvious fact check type of obfuscation.
Even if I knew nothing else, this alone would be enough to make me sure.
The author is an attorney and former liberal. I find it frustrating reading her articles. She is imprecise in her language and often waits until the end of the article to get to the point (buried lede).
And wasn't it on the vaccine bandwagon early on? Let's hope they're not the first canary in the mine.
I would investigate the vitamin D levels of the populace in Scotland.
We know that the clime in Scotland is gloomy much of the year.
Has their diet changed from olden times [less fish]?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.