Posted on 12/25/2021 10:46:24 AM PST by Enlightened1
Holy moly.
This study shows that after three months the vaccine effectiveness of Pfizer & Moderna against Omicron is actually negative. Pfizer customers are 76.5% more likely and Moderna customers are 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaxxed people.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v2
How weak will one be after 7 jabs? Will they require a chip?
“Are you implying the vaccine actually helped your hypothetical international travelers segment?”
The quote is from the study this thread is based on. It is what those researchers say about the result.
The gist is that the early Omicron clusters that this study captured, were not random samples - there were clear confounding variables, which they acknowledge.
So the sample had a concentration of vaccinated, infected, spreaders… I missed that what you posted was a quote.
But Ok - pretty interesting.
Big Pharma needs perpetual shots as a reliable source of profits.
The latest booster is only effective for ten weeks.
It’s healthier just to get Omicron (the common cold) and then the subsequent natural immunity.
He lied. Silly Putty is a greater invention than the jab scam.
The the footnotes to the study were were added, and it states the negative should be a positive
the abstract says:
study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines;
in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination.
However, the VE is significantly lower than that against Delta infection and declines rapidly over just a few months. The VE is re-established upon revaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine (54.6%, 95% CI: 30.4 to 70.4%).
You and Beau need to get your story straight.
From the report....
"Our study contributes to emerging evidence that BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 primary vaccine protection against Omicron decreases quickly over time with booster vaccination offering a significant increase in protection. In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations."
The negative number indicates a reduced effectiveness of the vaccine without a booster. Its does not for the sake of argument, indicate that it reduces your immune system from being able to fight off an infection via a natural means. It is known that the "vaccine" does not give permanent immunity at any level. It at best is a weak defense. And it does offer an ability to blunt the effect of the SARSCOV2 virus and its disease-causing effects.
Of course, this paper is NOT peer reviewed (not confirmed via separate means), so you are irresponsible and are spreading misinformation by twisting what the report actually says.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.