Posted on 12/18/2021 3:11:54 PM PST by ransomnote
Someone commented that the article I posted, Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? (freerepublic.com), has no basis in fact and and is sensationalized to create fear. They wanted to see proof.
I exported data from the CDC's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database which indicates that, like reports of deaths to VAERS, the Covid 'vaccines' have far more reports of adverse events (i.e., blindness) than other all other vaccines.
Consider that the target audience for influenza vaccines is around 250 million per year. After years of flu vaccine administration, there are a total of 233 reports of blindness following influenza vaccination.
Note other vaccines commonly given to all school children, every year (e.g., Measles) have relatively few reports of blindness post vaccination (e.g., 51 for Measles) compared with the Covid 'vaccine', which has 1615 reports of blindness post 'vaccine' in one year of administration.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation. Note that many vaccines have zero reports of blindness post vaccination and are not shown in the table below.
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
Search Term: "BLINDNESS"
VACCINE TYPE COUNT PERCENTAGE
| Anthrax | 38 | 1.47% |
| COVID-19 | 1,615 | 62.55% |
| Diphtheria | 138 | 5.34% |
| Encephalitis | 2 | 0.08% |
| Haemophilus | 34 | 1.32% |
| Hepatitis A | 61 | 2.36% |
| Hepatitis B | 157 | 6.08% |
| HPV | 217 | 8.4% |
| Influenza | 233 | 9.02% |
| Lyme | 19 | 0.74% |
| Measles | 51 | 1.98% |
| Meningitis | 91 | 3.52% |
| Mumps | 46 | 1.78% |
| Pertussis | 118 | 4.57% |
| Pneumonia | 51 | 1.98% |
| Polio | 59 | 2.29% |
| Rabies | 11 | 0.43% |
| Rotavirus | 6 | 0.23% |
| Rubella | 51 | 1.98% |
| Shingles | 158 | 6.12% |
| Smallpox | 8 | 0.31% |
| Tetanus | 133 | 5.15% |
| Tetanus | 8 | 0.31% |
| Typhoid | 11 | 0.43% |
| Varicella | 25 | 0.97% |
| Yellow Fever | 10 | 0.39% |
Spot the Covid "vaccine" in the chart below, which shows the number of reports of blindness all vaccines published to VAERS since 1990. It's the only tall bar.
The top four lines of the following table breaks down reports of blindness following Covid 'vaccination' by manufacturer. Below it appear to be misclassified data that is not properly categorized in VAERS.
REPORTS OF BLINDNESS FOLLOWING COVID 'VACCINATION'
Every day the evidence piles up, yet some continue to behave as if Covid 'vaccines' have an impressive performance record with few, if any indications we should be concerned. They say posting articles on this topic is merely 'sensationalizing' or creating needless fear and pick apart verbiage to find fault with those pointing to the evidence.
How much evidence that the Covid gene therapy shots are harmful? We've been posting evidence daily - it shouldn't trigger anyone into angry denials at this point.
My choice of wording, and that of others, also creates great angst because some have decided we are stating that 100% of every report of blindness is caused by the Covid 'vaccines'. If I meant 100% of every report indicates a causal relationship, I would state 100% of every report.
Clearly, Covid 'vaccines' are the subject of endless coincidences. The CDC and its loyal advocates on Free Republic say there's nothing to see here, and chastises any who discuss this content, reminding them that the relationship cannot be said to be causal (and note, the CDC did not specify '100%' either).
However, Steve Kirsch and his team presented a report to the FDA Advisory panel (ACIP) in which Kirsch points out that's a myth. The FDA panel was unable to refute the content of the report and ended the meeting by declining to recommend a booster dose.
"For the current COVID vaccines, our team is extremely confident that we can meet all the Bradford-Hill criteria for causality using VAERS analysis alone. Will our statisticians and VAERS experts be permitted to meet with any ACIP members to discuss the data?
For example, it is well established that a clear dose dependency relationship can be used to satisfy one of the Bradford-Hill criteria. Because two of the vaccines are multi-dose vaccines, a Dose 1/Dose 2 ratio analysis shows a very clear signal. Sadly, this type of analysis is currently being completely ignored by the CDC."
ransomnote: VAERS is a safety signal. Seeing disproportionate results or even having more than 50 reports of death would ordinarily result in having the product pulled off the market to examine them for mechanisms of harm/safety. None of the 'usual suspects' who vigorously ridicule negative reports about the vaccine express any desire for the CDC/NIH/Fauci et. al. to investigate these safety signals, much less discuss them with the medical community, or accept Steve Kirsch's million dollar offer to debate the details with his team.
Yea, let's let the lawyers be in charge. That's worked out well so far. You are lost in the matrix. Time for your red pill.
#QSentMe
PIng
Well, it was time for the $hot $hill’s $hift sign off, so he forgot his /s.
He’s workin’ 9 to 5 just to keep the $hots a $hillin’.
Then let's add blindness to the basket of deplorable side effect, up to and including death.
Its amazing how you vax pimps attack each and every side effect that pops up until, in your retarded world, there are none left. And you expect us to believe that despite the OBVIOUS number of related side effects.
Let's just say this and leave it at that (maybe you can understand....
The 'vaccine' f's people up in many different ways.
Clear enough for you, vaxxy?
Short answer. Yes.
Actually and based on what I read, you are the guy who provides Fauci/CDC/NIH/WHO/Gates/Soros/Biden/Derp State highly misleading non-scientific information and promotes the biggest conspiracy fact of them all.
It was you all along, Barzini.
I misremembered total worldwide doses. It’s approaching 5 billion world wide. If there was rampant blindness we would have heard about it. I found one article on google about a guy who complained his eyesight got bad for a day or two after his second dose but then got better.
Blindness simply isn’t a common side effect. Stupid to suggest it is without a single documented case where blame is squarely on the vaccine. (And if there IS a case or two, do your own math to figure out the risk.) there are plenty of side effects, but blindness isn’t one.
Now, all we need is the other two monkeys.
Now, all we need is the other two monkeys.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you can’t find two more monkeys to join your disinfro cell, you two can just go out on your own, shilling into the sunset.
https://www.emedicinehealth.com/what_triggers_an_ocular_migraine/article_em.htm
Tell me more about the widespread substitution of saline. 5%? 20%? Please provide evidence.
And you still don't seem to understand that the ratio of adverse events reported in the USA divided by the total number of doses worldwide is a meaningless ratio.
You either need to consider worldwide reported adverse events, or doses from the area where the adverse events are being reported.
I'm personally not particularly worried about any vaccine side effects, but then again I can also see from the data published on the NH Covid Dashboard that the current pattern of rising cases has nothing to do with Omicron since the trend line started back in August.
Whatever number of doses number you use, blindness as a potential side effect is exceedingly rare. Calculate your own percentage and let me know what it is.
Is there a single case of actual and permanent blindness you can point to? If so, please link to the case and details. Is there someone with a medical degree on record saying there was a causal relationship to taking a vaccine? Which vaccine causes blindness?
Of course it matters how many doses were taken for each reported “ailment”. That’s how you determine the risk. But you also have to establish that it was the vaccine, and wasn’t going to happen anyway.
One good report of blindness would bridge the credibility gap.
re: “I’ll preface this by saying ...”
You might head over to https://wmbriggs.com/ and look what an examination of the record reveals via stats in terms of Covid-19 vaccine effects, then do a wider read of those who actually had effects from the vaccines, and those accounts are out there.
Another site is https://market-ticker.org/ for some hard-nosed analysis and some personal accounts in the comment sections. See also latest topics: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?blog=Market-Ticker-Nad
And then there is this:
And the question you REALLY have to ask yourself after watching the first hour of the interview below is, WHY isn’t there a therapeutic regimen coming from the likes of the Mayo Clinic and others?
https://rumble.com/vqx8ma-dr-peter-mccullough-with-joe-rogan-the-joe-rogan-experience-1747.html
SHort-story: We’ve been steam-rollered by the pinheads at the CDC through the likes of tyrants like Fauci (who, incidentally mishandled AIDS back when) who have micro focused ONLY on vaccines to the exclusion of therapeutics (both in terms of practices and prescriptive or non-prescriptive drugs) ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.