Posted on 12/18/2021 3:11:54 PM PST by ransomnote
Someone commented that the article I posted, Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine? (freerepublic.com), has no basis in fact and and is sensationalized to create fear. They wanted to see proof.
I exported data from the CDC's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database which indicates that, like reports of deaths to VAERS, the Covid 'vaccines' have far more reports of adverse events (i.e., blindness) than other all other vaccines.
Consider that the target audience for influenza vaccines is around 250 million per year. After years of flu vaccine administration, there are a total of 233 reports of blindness following influenza vaccination.
Note other vaccines commonly given to all school children, every year (e.g., Measles) have relatively few reports of blindness post vaccination (e.g., 51 for Measles) compared with the Covid 'vaccine', which has 1615 reports of blindness post 'vaccine' in one year of administration.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation. Note that many vaccines have zero reports of blindness post vaccination and are not shown in the table below.
Search VAERS Database (medalerts.org)
Search Term: "BLINDNESS"
VACCINE TYPE COUNT PERCENTAGE
| Anthrax | 38 | 1.47% |
| COVID-19 | 1,615 | 62.55% |
| Diphtheria | 138 | 5.34% |
| Encephalitis | 2 | 0.08% |
| Haemophilus | 34 | 1.32% |
| Hepatitis A | 61 | 2.36% |
| Hepatitis B | 157 | 6.08% |
| HPV | 217 | 8.4% |
| Influenza | 233 | 9.02% |
| Lyme | 19 | 0.74% |
| Measles | 51 | 1.98% |
| Meningitis | 91 | 3.52% |
| Mumps | 46 | 1.78% |
| Pertussis | 118 | 4.57% |
| Pneumonia | 51 | 1.98% |
| Polio | 59 | 2.29% |
| Rabies | 11 | 0.43% |
| Rotavirus | 6 | 0.23% |
| Rubella | 51 | 1.98% |
| Shingles | 158 | 6.12% |
| Smallpox | 8 | 0.31% |
| Tetanus | 133 | 5.15% |
| Tetanus | 8 | 0.31% |
| Typhoid | 11 | 0.43% |
| Varicella | 25 | 0.97% |
| Yellow Fever | 10 | 0.39% |
Spot the Covid "vaccine" in the chart below, which shows the number of reports of blindness all vaccines published to VAERS since 1990. It's the only tall bar.
The top four lines of the following table breaks down reports of blindness following Covid 'vaccination' by manufacturer. Below it appear to be misclassified data that is not properly categorized in VAERS.
REPORTS OF BLINDNESS FOLLOWING COVID 'VACCINATION'
Every day the evidence piles up, yet some continue to behave as if Covid 'vaccines' have an impressive performance record with few, if any indications we should be concerned. They say posting articles on this topic is merely 'sensationalizing' or creating needless fear and pick apart verbiage to find fault with those pointing to the evidence.
How much evidence that the Covid gene therapy shots are harmful? We've been posting evidence daily - it shouldn't trigger anyone into angry denials at this point.
My choice of wording, and that of others, also creates great angst because some have decided we are stating that 100% of every report of blindness is caused by the Covid 'vaccines'. If I meant 100% of every report indicates a causal relationship, I would state 100% of every report.
Clearly, Covid 'vaccines' are the subject of endless coincidences. The CDC and its loyal advocates on Free Republic say there's nothing to see here, and chastises any who discuss this content, reminding them that the relationship cannot be said to be causal (and note, the CDC did not specify '100%' either).
However, Steve Kirsch and his team presented a report to the FDA Advisory panel (ACIP) in which Kirsch points out that's a myth. The FDA panel was unable to refute the content of the report and ended the meeting by declining to recommend a booster dose.
"For the current COVID vaccines, our team is extremely confident that we can meet all the Bradford-Hill criteria for causality using VAERS analysis alone. Will our statisticians and VAERS experts be permitted to meet with any ACIP members to discuss the data?
For example, it is well established that a clear dose dependency relationship can be used to satisfy one of the Bradford-Hill criteria. Because two of the vaccines are multi-dose vaccines, a Dose 1/Dose 2 ratio analysis shows a very clear signal. Sadly, this type of analysis is currently being completely ignored by the CDC."
ransomnote: VAERS is a safety signal. Seeing disproportionate results or even having more than 50 reports of death would ordinarily result in having the product pulled off the market to examine them for mechanisms of harm/safety. None of the 'usual suspects' who vigorously ridicule negative reports about the vaccine express any desire for the CDC/NIH/Fauci et. al. to investigate these safety signals, much less discuss them with the medical community, or accept Steve Kirsch's million dollar offer to debate the details with his team.
HOW MANY people are you going to ‘blind’ with your so-called Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ DugwayDuke?
How many people’s live do you have to RUIN in order to gain a really small margin of not well-defined immunity to Covid-19 in some members of the population?
Tell us DugwayDuke - how many people including children are you willing to sacrifice, in lieu of using known, effective therapeutics against COvid-19?
Dr. Marty Makary (of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) gives more background and insight on this, which you at every turn seem to deny:
https://youtu.be/FeyCGJMEaSQ?t=1911
Full article here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lives-destroyed-government-failure-natural-immunity/
Some herding dog breeds, due to a mutation, are susceptible to ivermectin.
Ivermectin won a Nobel prize for saving human lives. It is due for another.
re: “Successful management of ...”
Well, look who else is playing three-card Monte on the unsuspecting with misdirection!
Don’t you mis-informationalists EVER get tired of serving your evil masters?
| Dr. Sivana wrote: |
Actually, what I found surprising was the relatively high percentage attributed to HPV shots, given that far few people get that shot, and most who get it are young and healthy. |
I think it was considered a scandal at the time. Here's two 'concern' articles:
_Jim wrote: “How many people’s live do you have to RUIN in order to gain a really small margin of not well-defined immunity to Covid-19 in some members of the population?”
Regardless of your deliberate misunderstandings, the vaccines are safe and effective. Ivermectin, HCQ, and Vitamin D are ineffective in dealing with COVID.
“Well, I haven’t gone blind from the vaccine, and I didn’t go blind from the first thing I was warned about all those decades ago.”
Which have you done more often???
You forgot the /sarc in your post.
Without it you seem to be uneducated and ill informed.
If there are “only” 1600 blindness cases out of 7 billion doses, you’re going to have a nearly impossible time proving your eyesight was damaged by the vaccine, and not by whatever normally causes eyesight issues, like AGING.
But feel free to ask a medical malpractice lawyer and see if you have a case. I’d bet you a nickel you don’t have a case.
re: “Regardless of your deliberate misunderstandings, the vaccines are safe and effective. Ivermectin, HCQ, and Vitamin D are ineffective in dealing with COVID.
TWO THINGS, First, DUMBASS,THE VACCINES ARE NOT 100% EFFECTIVE. So-called ‘breakthrough’ cases litter the country.
Second, THERE ARE OTHER THERAPEUTICS BEYOND HCQ, AND IVM, and Vit D is NOT a therapeutic.
See - here this thing - YOU DID NOT VIEW THE VIDEO BY Dr. Marty Makary and HEAR the growing list of therapeutics that are NOW FOUND TO HAVE EFFICACY.
And, on top of that, THERE IS NATURALLY ACQUIRED IMMUNITY which the CDC and YOU COMPLETELY IGNORE.
AGAIN, you are either genuinely STUPID (a distinct possibility), or you are WILLFULLY ‘PLAYING’ some game here FOR PAY. There is only ONE MOTIVE to your actions: either it is STUPIDITY or you are literally ‘on the take’, probably from China.
LOL, Kool Aid, you drink.
Every drug has a disclaimer 5 miles long. Covid vaxes are short on the adverse effect list to make it hard to identify and sue.
here is the shortest side effect list of any drug in the entire world. my toothpaste has a list of side effects longer than this.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/expect/after.html?s_cid=10535:%2Bside%20%2Beffects%20%2Bof%20%2Bcovid%20%2Bvaccine:sem.b:p:RG:GM:gen:PTN:FY21
6 lies in 2 sentences.
When you can’t provide evidence of your goofball claims, you say I’m drinking Kool Aid. Do you have any training in medical research?
According to the table, the odds of blindness with 4+ billion doses given is 2.5e-7. The vaccine has plenty of shortcomings, and many side effects, but causing actual blindness is not one of them. Here is a report of one person reporting an eye issue after a 2nd dose. : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176659/
Suing is pointless because they are IMMUNE, period. Not even part of the Vaccine Court. Given total blanket immunity......
Suing is pointless because they are IMMUNE, period. Not even part of the Vaccine Court avenue. Given total blanket immunity......
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid 'vaccines' account for 63%% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation. , blueplum wrote: |
case histories, and honesty of the patient, are so important in interpreting tabulated results. Home remedies may be cheap but they have side effects, too Ivermectin-induced blindness treated https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23317101/ Successful management of ivermectin-induced blindness in an African lion |
You're really sick, downplaying risks of 'vaccines' to freepers and exaggerating 'concern' about safe, effective, FDA approved alternatives, by posting two specific instances where an animal was treated for Ivermectin toxicity.
With a that said, I wonder if some of these side effects being attributed to the Covid shots make sense. I see literally every possible ailment under the sun being attributed to them, from heart problems to fertility to blindness to sudden cancer and beyond. While I’m sure some people are having negative reactions, as with any vaccine, I’m skeptical that the shots are quite as dangerous as many seem to believe, considering that nobody I know, not one person, has had any negative reaction. I know vaccinated women who have had healthy babies (received Covid shots during them pregnancies, not before FWIW). I know young and old people who have received boosters now as well with no negative reactions (yet). Some of the people I know who were vaccinated received the shots in the first wave of vaccinations, before the shots were widely available, and as of yet, are okay. Is it a coincidence that between 25 and 30 people that I happen to know are completely fine after being Covid Vaxxed if indeed the shots are so potently dangerous?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.