Posted on 11/28/2021 1:58:06 PM PST by ransomnote
[H/T Grey_whiskers]
![]() |
Summary
There is no doubt the mRNA vaccines are causing prion diseases. People didn’t have these diseases before the shot and suddenly they develop them after the shot. There is no other explanation for this. None of the “fact checkers” can explain the cause of the excess rates. Prion diseases are incurable and always fatal. You can die as soon as 6 weeks after COVID vaccination (see within 6 weeks and within 6 months examples).
However, Twitter believes this is not true, but they refuse to tell anyone why they think that. Other fact checkers who have checked this out never did a VAERS query and are unable to explain away the “excess” number of reports other than doing a blanket dismissal that everything in VAERS is fraudulent without providing any evidence of that claim (other than one report out of 1.6M reports).
None of the fact checkers will debate on this to set the record straight.
On November 24, 2021 I posted the following message on Twitter:
Twitter suspended my account hours later. There is no appeal available. All content over the last 12 years was removed. All my 75K followers were zeroed. My messages were removed. There was no opportunity to download my content.
The only thing left: that my Twitter ID was @stkirsch.
Twitter won’t tell me that!!!! They are deliberately withholding their definitive analysis on this extremely important scientific issue. Why???
I really want to know. Obviously, Twitter fact-checkers (all of whom I presume must have PhD degrees or MD degrees to be able to assess my claims) were able to quickly read all the medical literature and determine without a doubt I made an error and should be terminated for making a mistake. But they won’t tell me the mistake!!
If they want to fight misinformation, why aren’t they posting a link to their research proving me wrong when they terminate the account. They obviously invested hours of time in the research before they terminated me. Why not provide a link to that research so everyone can learn from it including me??
Back in May 2021 when Professor Byram Bridle was disclosing the FOIA request on the Pfizer vaccine bio-distribution data he mentioned that the spike protein was associated with Lewy body formation which is linked to prion diseases. He expressed concern that the vaccines could cause prion diseases like dementia, Alzheimer’s, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD).
What do you know. He was right. Now we have proof.
Check out these VAERS query results. These searches are over all 30 years of VAERS and all 70+ vaccines. See anything unusual? Yeah, for less than 1 year of the COVID vaccines, the results are off the charts.
And for CJD which is extremely rare:
Remember, these are 30 year searches for all vaccines. Clearly there are excess reports. And we know VAERS isn’t being “over-reported” this year which I’ve shown many times before (events not caused by the vaccine are reported at rates comparable to other vaccines).
Nobody can answer that question, not even the Twitter fact checkers!
For further reading, check out these articles:
Stephanie Seneff’s paper on prion disease and the COVID vaccines
Bart Classen’s paper linking the vaccines and prion diseases
SARS-CoV-2 causes brain inflammation and induces Lewy body formation in macaques
SARS-CoV-2 Prion-Like Domains in Spike Proteins Enable Higher Affinity to ACE2
And compare them to some of the “fact checks” which claim there are no instances in VAERS which as you can see from the queries above (which you can replicate yourself):
You decide who is telling the truth.
And note that the “fact checkers” never did a single VAERS query. Wow. That’s the first place you’d look to prove the claim is false.
It might exacerbate them. But I’ve had diabetes for 6 years and got vaccinated in August. And I’m still here and have had no complications.
We need studies that clearly indicate that there is an issue. The anecdotal stories aren’t sufficient. And comparisons like were made in the Kirsch article are not zt all scientific. As I pointed out the number of cases are well within the normal averages in fact they are low.
And it is likely the reporting between vaccines are not consistent. CJD following a flu vaccine is probably not going to be reported as an adverse event. CJD following a new vaccine using a new tech like covid vaccines are probably reported more.
PING
.
I have a Twitter account. I have it for getting information, I keep my eyes open and my fingers away from the keyboard, lol. I think in the 6 to 7 years or so that I’ve been a member, I have probably posted responses about that many times.
I really would like to respond to some of the liberal sewer snakes on there, but I’m not gonna sink to their level.
sfl
Wormwood
Heb. la’anah,
Apocalypse punitive suffering.
Extreme bitter hemlock judgement
Curse
BOOKbump
You’re looking at the cases of CJD in 30 years of the CDC’s efforts to collect data on vaccinations. Why would 28 cases across all 30 years, 24 of which are for Covid ‘vaccines’ in the past 11 months, be expected? Something is WRONG with the Covid ‘vaccines’.
I was never on Tweeter, Fartbarf, Instacrap, LinkedIn or any other social sites, except FR and a few firearm sites, years ago.
Talk about whining...
I already did, try to pay attention.
But your comment about 'control group' is key.
I'm trying to find someone to make me an armband (I don't wear hats).
So 475,000 cases of dementia occur every year in people over 65. But only 66% of seniors get vaccinated for flu. so assuming dimentia cases arfe spread evenly, that's 313,500 cases in people who got vaccinated.
Assuming that flu vaccinations occur once per year. And assuming the 313,750 cases are spread evenly throughout the year. That would be about 2 months/ 12 months * 313,500 cases. or approximately 52,250 cases of dementia in the 60 days following a flu shot.
Since we aren't seeing anything like that in the vaers database, I think it's safe to assume that medical doctors are assuming dementia is not an adverse reaction to the flu shot and not reporting it as such.
Covid vaccines are new and using a new technology. So I believe it's getting more reporting of events following vaccinations than the flu vaccine is. But I think most doctors are still assuming dementia is not related. Or we would be seeing much higher numbers reported for covid vaccines as well.
The covid vaccines are known to cause blood clotting and cardiovascular damage. If there are 100 cases as reported by Kirsch in 200 million vaccinations, that's 1 in a million. Which is less than the known 4 to 5 in a million risk of a severe blood clot issue.
So maybe this adds an additional risk factor, but I've not seen any evidence the covid vaccine is worse or even close to the damage caused by covid disease itself. The risks for the vaccines are by no means zero, but are still small relative to covid disease.
That leaves us with 3 options:
You are going to trigger a radical if you keep spouting that “reasonable assessment” stuff.
No something is wrong with the reporting.
I think Doctors in general do not report CJD as an adverse event to flu vaccines or Covid vaccines. But covid vaccines being a new technology has gotten a little better reporting.
If 350 cases of CJD occur every year and a little over 50% of the nation gets the flu vaccine. Then you would expect to see 350 cases * 50% vaccinated * (2 months/12 months) = 29 cases of CJD with 60 days of the flu vaccine every year. But you’re not seeing that in the VAERS reporting and the most likely explanation is that doctors don’t think it’s a reaction to the vaccine so they don’t report it.
We need every event to be recorded for all vaccinated people, regardless of whether the doctor thinks it’s an adverse reaction or not. THen we could answer these questions better.
But then who really wants all their medical history in a government database?
And I thought you were older than 7 years...
Is that a prion-induced regression?
Steve Kirsch’s team checked other annual rates and found that there wasn’t over reporting this year. There’s something really wrong with the Covid vaccines.
Why would someone even consider options 1 or 2? Option 3 is the ONLY way to go.
I’m currently rotating Ivermectin and HCQ every other day. Seems to work very well.
I do not use Twitter at all, however I think lies and propaganda are good things to criticize even when one is not a consumer of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.