Posted on 11/26/2021 1:47:40 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski
A world-renowned cardiology expert warned of a link between the hastily developed COVID-19 injections and heart disease. He said on UK television that cardiology researchers have found evidence to support this, but are too afraid of losing money from the drug companies to publish the proof.
Speaking to GB News’ Alex Phillips, Dr. Aseem Malhotra referenced a recent publication by cardiac surgeon Stephen Gundry, noting that COVID-19 injections “dramatically increase” inflammation of blood vessels, heart muscles, and “may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events.”
Gundry’s paper revealed that following the mRNA COVID injections, the chance of developing heart disease jumped from 11% to 25%.
“Now what this research has shown, is that markers associated with increasing the risk of heart attack and probably even progression of underlying heart disease in people who have already got some heart disease, have seen a significantly increased risk (of heart attack) from 11% at five years to 25%,” observed Dr. Malhotra. “Now that’s a huge increase.”
Adding that the findings were “very concerning indeed,” Malhotra said Gundry’s findings were corroborated by researchers in U.K. cardiology departments, who were too afraid to publish their own findings, in case they were financially penalized by drug companies.
“Somebody from a very prestigious British institution, a cardiology department researcher, a whistleblower if you like, contacted me to say that the researchers in this department had found something similar within the coronary arteries linked to the vaccine, inflammation from imaging studies around the coronary arteries. They had a meeting, and these researchers at the moment have decided they’re not going to publish their findings because they are concerned about losing research money from the drug industry...”
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
This is bad but covid causes worse.
The individuals in Dr Gundry were in a “Preventative Cardiology Practice”.
Pulstest.com says that normal PULS score for the general population is 3.5%.
So this patient population which started at 11% was already as higher risk. Nevertheless the study showed that there was a rise from 11% to 25%. So it’s certainly concerning.
What would be interesting to compare is what happens to the PULS score when you actually get sick with COVID.
Waiting for the democrat/media/big pharma/Faux-xi cheerleaders on here to say the death serum is perfectly safe with 98% efficacy.
Agreed. I don't believe the leftist/fascist power-elites planned the shots as intentionally dangerous. I realize many people believe that. I'm not convinced - yet.
However, I believe that same group was and is just fine with the extreme risk associated with putting hundreds of millions of people into an experimental drug trial.
They finally found a fear button to push that resonated. They tried various gun-control related scares, months of race riots, decades of predicting the sky was falling due to global warming, man-caused global warming, or simply climate change.
Eventually they hit upon a mild to moderately dangerous virus, and with the help of a compliant media/propaganda wing and a drug/medical establishment that stood to make billions they finally found the right combination. They've accumulated more power than even they could've hoped for in their best scenarios.
The vaccines, far from being a real cure, a real means to stop the scam-demic, are really just another way to exert control and gain power. I believe the push for vaccinations is based on two motives.
One, by making out the vaccines to be all-important, they increase their power by controlling them and by bestowing the prized "fully vaccinated" moniker - or taking it away - at at whim.
The other reason they are so h**l-bent on getting everyone vaccinated is because they are stupid. Well, they rushed into a course of action without considering the consequences. "Hey, let's make vaccination the next big stick we can use to wield power. Even better, they are untested and dangerous, they'll take out some of those pesky little people that keep getting in our way." So it pushed their de-population buttons. But, they weren't really thinking ahead, blinded by the imagined glory of their dreams. Then someone pointed out "Ahem. You realize if the vaccines and umpteen rounds of boosters succeed in taking out a fair percentage of the population... The little people that are left are going to be predominantly the independent ones, the ones that refused the vaccines." Oops. They'll have unintentionally upped the percentage of stubborn SOBs who don't like being told what to do - making their elitist plans just that much harder to enact.
Hence the fascist push to force experimental medical procedures on everyone a-la Josef Mengele. They need to weed some of us out too.
Great meme!
Doctors will tell you it's perfectly fine to be injected with the death serum. I've had my neurologist tell me that even though I have epilepsy, even though the death serum causes neurological disorders, it's perfectly okay for me to get it. My cardiologist, despite having had heart inflammation due to food poisoning, said the death serum is perfectly okay for me.
Network doctors are bought and paid for and compromised. They cannot be trusted.
https://twitter.com/ArrestatieT5821/status/1464286044187242497
Apparently there is a schedule of when to release variants?
My cardiologist told me if I get the jab we are done. Told him no worrles. Aint gonna happen
'They aren't going to publish their findings, they are concerned about losing research money'
Dr Aseem Malhotra reveals a cardiology researcher found similar results to a new report showing an increase in risk of heart attack following the mRNA COVID vaccine. pic.twitter.com/63evorQwlJ— GB News (@GBNEWS) November 25, 2021
Heres the article:
***********************************
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712
This article has an expression of concern
Abstract
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
**************************
1. The blood clots that are causing the problems are caused by spike proteins. Every person afflicted with these problems should take a D-Dimer test. If you’ve been jabbed with the clot-shot, you’ve got lots of spike proteins in your blood stream.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep:
( There also is a chance that IVM also rids the system of excessive spike protein , by chemical bonding with it , the body then likely excretes it.
Here is the science for it:
There is reasonably solid evidence that ivermectin docks to the spike protein itself to prevent binding to the ACE2 receptor which is the primary pathology causing the tissue damage and clots related to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this is also an implication that this ability of ivermectin to disable the binding of the Spike protein including the vaccine-produced spike proteins. This binding of ivermectin to disable the spike protein is also preserved even with the newer spike protein mutations, but its activity against the original Wuhan spike protein,(the one vaccines were designed to produce) is fairly well studied at this point.
Abstract:
Background/Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2. Materials and Methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study. Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08.
Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.
******************************
The following video [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11Bl2v3BR2M ] explains the multiple mechanisms of the activity of Ivermectin including the ability of the body to maintain its basic defense of the cell nucleus in preserving the body’s ability to produce antiviral proteins, inhibition of RNA dependant RNA polymerase which inhibits the replication of viral RNA (possibly including that from the mRNA vaccine package), the stat 3 human signaling pathway which inhibits the production of blood clots also possibly mitigating some of the vaccines most dangerous side effects. Also discussed is the inhibition of the CD147 pathway by ivermectin which again may block the clumping of platelets due to spike protein either from the virus or possibly the vaccines.
**************************************
2. Ivermectin will stop the China virus dead in it’s tracks. And Ivr doesn’t respect variants; it just works.>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep: You have to have a level of greater than 160 nanograms of IVM per liter of blood in your system, at that level it kills the virus. To get that level you beed to take O.6 mgs of IVM per kilogram of body weight for 5 days or longer, along with Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Quercetin,,( See the protocol link below)Take with food to increase absorption rate.
See here:
Proof of Effectiveness:
**************************************************
The Governement mislead America:
1) mRNA vaccines DO NOT provide immunity of any kind.No antibodies.
2) mRNA vaccines do not prevent transmisson of the virus.
3) mRNA vaccines do attenuate Civud symptoms if the Covid mutant variant is vulnerable, for a limited period of 5 months ( Pfizer) to 6 or 8 months ( Moderna).
4) The mRNA vaccines do not work in the nasal cavity, in the pharnyx or in the lung, they only work in the blood stream, but give no protection to Covid involved organs.IVM does.
Thats why Ivermectin in your friend when taken within a few days of the infection or as prophylaxis:
How to get Ivermectin:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/how-to-get-ivermectin/
OR :
India Mart:
Protocol to Follow:
Try to imagine the kind of fear you will feel when the perfidy of you and the medical field in general becomes widespread common knowledge. And it will.
Wait…we were simply following orders! (Banality of Evil)
Reason, reasons and excuses will all fall on deaf ears among angry mobs and the PTB are creating angry mobs out of most of humanity. It’s only a matter of time before none believe anything the overlords say.
Save
Why would I trust anything from people of such low moral character?
They're willing to sacrifice untold lives just because they want a little drug company money, yet we're supposed to trust them?
Obamacare socialized medicine made physicians march to the Government Protocol drum. If they deviate from protocol they risk losing their license. The good ones are risking everything by blowing the whistle on a corrupted system.
This article is about the ones who are "too afraid of losing money from the drug companies to publish the proof."
Why would I trust them?
That may be the best meme ever. I’m serious.
Sure, that was it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.