Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forklift to aisle one! Grown Florida man throws EIGHT MINUTE tantrum on Costco floor after being asked to wear a mask!
UK Daily Mail ^ | 10/31/2021 | Matt Mcnulty

Posted on 11/21/2021 10:23:52 AM PST by simpson96

A Florida man was filmed as he lay on the floor in a Costco for eight minutes in protest after he was told to put on a face mask, as a pair of local sheriffs ask the maskless man to get off the floor and leave the premises.(snip)

'He said he would sue Costco and the police if they touched him,' the original filmer, who asked to remain anonymous, told Newsflare.(snip)

he got up and paid for his stuff at the self check out then the officer escorted him out.'

'Outside the manager was arguing with an officer that they should have not let him pay for his stuff' the person behind the camera added.(snip)

A woman dubbed 'Costco Karen' sat on the floor of the superstore, refusing to move while declaring 'I have constitutional rights!' after she was similarly asked to put on a face mask.(snip)

The woman had a face mask dangling from one ear but refused to put it on completely to cover her mouth.

'You just have to tell me that you have one. Well, then you have to wear it. You have to wear your mask in public. This is private property,' the female employee said in the video posted back on June 30, 2020.

'I am not a member of Costco,' the woman is heard snapping back.

'Want me to get that taken care of for you? Well, then you’re going to have to put your mask on,' the employee says.

'I will not,' the woman says curtly, adding the mask requirement is 'your problem'.

'Well then come back another time,' the employee says.

'I want to speak to your boss,' the outraged woman replies.


(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; covidstooges; floridaman; obamacare; vaccinemandates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: enumerated

> Regardless of property rights, or any other rights, stupidity should be called out. That’s what the first amendment is all about, which is another conservative value. <

The First Amendment is meant to protect you against government retaliation. It is not meant to protect you while on private property.

For example, you can stand on a public sidewalk and hold a “Biden is an idiot” sign all day long. No police officer or city employee can legally move you. You are protected by the 1A .

But if you go on private property, the 1A does not apply. The property owner can trespass you just for holding that sign. And if you don’t go, you can be legally arrested.


61 posted on 11/21/2021 5:24:17 PM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: nagant
If you karens don’t want to wear masks then don’t go to places which require masks. Simple.

Haha. That's hilarious. A mask fgt calling US Karens.

Dude, you're a riot.


62 posted on 11/21/2021 5:26:05 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

> So, there is no limit to businesses? No negros? No whites? No Jews? I bet you think there is a limit. <

Yes, legally there is a limit. You cannot deny service to an individual based on a protected class argument. For example, veteran status is a federal protected class. So no business can legally put up a sign saying “No veterans will be served”.

Race is another protected class. There are others.

Some conservatives think the whole “protected class” thing is too much of an infringement on property rights. I don’t quite buy that argument, but I do see some merit in it. So it’s a head scratcher for me.


63 posted on 11/21/2021 5:32:13 PM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: simpson96

To hell with COSTCO! I’ll never set foot in one again.


68 posted on 11/21/2021 6:00:58 PM PST by Theophilus (Coercion Is Not Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

# Costco is a private business. It is also a membership-only site. So give the guy a choice: either put on a mask or we’ll cancel your membership and refund your membership fee in full.

Sorry. Property rights have not meant a damn thing in this country for decades. Both individuals are absolutely within their rights to refuse to wear a mask under the terms of the ADA, which, unlike these ‘mask mandates’, is actual law, passed by congress and signed by an actual president. It is even against the law for the business to ask =why= they can’t wear a mask.

Are you also going to try to claim that if they refuse to allow someone in a wheelchair access, that this is also fine because it is a private business?


69 posted on 11/21/2021 6:07:55 PM PST by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bagster
You do realize that Godwin's law is not a real law, right?

It is a real principle of Internet discussion forums: if you have to bring up Nazis in an argument, you've lost the argument.

And the concentration camp analogy is a legitimate one

Hardly. For two reasons:

  1. First, you have a right to patronize another store with different policies or to not patronize any of them at all. People had no choice on whether or not to be relocated to a death camp.
  2. Secondly, you don't defeat fascism with fascism. You defeat it with a free people demanding their freedom and RESPECTING OTHER PEOPLES' FREEDOM. An example:
    Let us hypothesize that you don't drink alcohol and do not approve of other people drinking alcohol. Let's then say I do like to have a drink from time to time (in moderation).
    You invite my family to your home for a barbecue. I bring a 6 pack of my favorite brew with me.
    You are perfectly within your property rights to tell me to leave the beer in the car because you don't want your children exposed to it. I have a choice: respect your wishes and enjoy the barbecue or leave your property because I want my beer.
    You are NOT perfectly within your property rights to tell me that I may not enjoy my adult beverage within my own home.
    I am also not exercising my liberty properly if I tell you, "hell no, I have a right to drink my beer and you have no right to tell me I can't do so while at your barbecue!!"

Do you also want to force the baker to bake the cake? Or force the florist to decorate the gay wedding?

Would you be in favor of a store prohibiting mask wear (and I'm not talking about for security reasons)?

And the concentration camp analogy is a legitimate one, considering they are building 'camps' for the unvaxxed in Australia. Mask mandates, vax passports, and a willing, docile, compliant populace is a hop, skip, and a jump from Nazi Germany.

They are also forcing segregation in Austria, Germany, and, shortly, Italy and Croatia (how ironic is that??)

Although it's scary and tragic, it's totally irrelevant.


You don't defeat fascism with fascism. You defeat fascism with freedom.

70 posted on 11/21/2021 6:21:32 PM PST by markomalley (Directive 10-289 is in force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: bagster
Maybe you'd babble about PROPERTY RIGHTS as you boarded the party train.

I won't board the train. I'm not in the USSA any longer.

But if I was, that's a specious example.

You want to be a fascist, knock yourself out.

71 posted on 11/21/2021 6:24:47 PM PST by markomalley (Directive 10-289 is in force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

> Are you also going to try to claim that if they refuse to allow someone in a wheelchair access, that this is also fine because it is a private business? <

No. The federal government has set up a number of protected classes. Handicap status is one of them. It is illegal to discriminate against a person solely because of their membership in a protected class..

I find much to like about this law. But as I noted in an earlier post, I’m not 100% on board because such laws do infringe on property rights.

I’ve given this some thought. (I’m retired, so I’ve got the time!) If I were in the Senate when this law was up for a vote, I think I’d scratch my head a bit, then vote in favor of the law.


72 posted on 11/21/2021 6:32:26 PM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

LOL. There is no “argument” to be had here. Violent Marxists burn our cities and control our government thanks to the support of woke corporations like Costco.

I can assure Marxists do not care why you surrender. All they care about is that you are on your knees and submitting. But do have fun with your doctrinaire “private property” debates on your high horse perch.


73 posted on 11/21/2021 6:46:53 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
I can assure Marxists do not care why you surrender. All they care about is that you are on your knees and submitting. But do have fun with your doctrinaire “private property” debates on your high horse perch.

Since I no longer live in the USSA nor in any socialist country in the West, it's not my issue.

But enjoy. I'll just continue to have fun while drinking my coffee, looking at this view out my front window, and shake my head at how far my prior residence has slipped.


74 posted on 11/21/2021 7:01:25 PM PST by markomalley (Directive 10-289 is in force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
>> "Secondly, you don't defeat fascism with fascism"

How did you come up with that nonsense? Refusing to respect the fascists' property rights is in no way itself fascism. Were the Founding Fathers fascists when they disregarded the King's property rights and threw his tea in the harbor? Did we respect the property rights of the German's when they bombed Pearl Harbor? NO, we bombed the hell out of their Coscos and a hell of a lot of other things too.

Property rights are not God given rights, they are given by society with the expectation that private ownership will be beneficial to society as a whole as well as to the property holder. Without society protecting private property rights there would be no private property (north korea comes to mind here) and this process of creating and protecting private property gives society as a whole a legitimate say in how the property can be used.


>> "You defeat it with a free people demanding their freedom"

No, freedom is taken by force, not demands.


75 posted on 11/21/2021 7:30:43 PM PST by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater
Property rights are not God given rights

What?????

76 posted on 11/21/2021 8:43:51 PM PST by markomalley (Directive 10-289 is in force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Don’t touch just spray paint with pepper spray from head to foot & can someone show me were in the Constitution you have the right to be Typhoid Mary when asked politely to wear a sneeze guard so you don’t spew over everything!


77 posted on 11/21/2021 8:44:46 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (Treason is the reason for Democrat Sedition & Subversion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Pretty mild for #FloridaMan.


78 posted on 11/21/2021 8:55:39 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I just did. It’s nice down here.


79 posted on 11/21/2021 8:58:23 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Florida: America's new free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nebr FAL owner
>> "can someone show me were in the Constitution you have the right to be Typhoid Mary when asked politely to wear a sneeze guard"

Under the Constitution the people retain all of their rights not expressly given to the federal government. Can you point out in the Constitution where this right to demand compliance with health edicts has been given to the feds?

ps. nobody has a problem with being politely asked to wear a mask or a sneeze guard - the problem is with being told to wear the face diapers. Big difference between those two things.


80 posted on 11/21/2021 9:37:18 PM PST by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson