Posted on 11/12/2021 3:24:11 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet
Will the Supreme Court of the US accept the 30 pieces of silver when the Executive Orders to place US citizens in virtual or physical internment camps for refusing the Wuhan/Fauci virus mRNA treatments? My guess is yes based upon their history from WW II and their obsession with precedent.
FDR issued his executive orders to place US citizens of German, Japanese and Italian decent into internment camps. The Supreme Court ducked the issue until the waning days of WW II and graciously withheld their decision reversing part of the order until after FDR's re-election.
Their reluctance to step in was for the most part fear of court packing and the acceptance of the silver. FDR and his Congress had a history of unconstitutional orders and laws, and yet, the Supreme Court cowered and counted their silver.
Luckily FDR died before he could complete his march to communism. Now we have his re-incarnation in Biden (in reality Obama and the NWO) as they march towards a new destroyed communist America.
They will accept it without payment. There is only one answer to this.
State Security and Public Health trump every “right” in the Constitution, and magically transform limited government into unlimited government. Of course the court would go along.
Thirty pieces of silver?
Nope, just a good editorial from the clowns at the NYT.
They are inconsistent with that precedent obsession. They refused to hear any of the lawsuits pertaining to changes made in election rules/laws, as decided in Bush vs. Gore in 2000. According to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, State Legislatures are the only entity that can create election laws, yet we saw several instances, where public officials, and not Legislators made changes to the laws and rules pertaining to the 2020 election. They ignored their own precedent, so its anybody's guess how they will proceed. As far as I'm concerned, the Supreme Court has destroyed whatever credibility it may have once had.
What ‘legal precedent’ for internment? The executive order 9066 that FDR signed which led to the internment of Asian-American citizens was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court and FDR was forced to suspend the order.
On a side note, liberals always start yammering about concentration camps when a Republican becomes President. Please feel free to point out the the two verified instances of mass internment of U.S. citizens over the last 100 years took place under Dem Presidents. The internment of Asian-Americans by FDR during WWII, and the so-called Palmer Raids under Woodrow Wilson that imprisoned thousands of Commies and other leftists with no indictments or trials.
I’ve always heard that the Supreme Court upheld the internment of Japanese Americans. It was the Korematsu case. Was there another case in which the Supreme Court overturned the internment order?
I don't believe so.
On the other hand, Korematsu announced the strict scrutiny test. So far as I know Korematsu is the only SCOTUS case where the Court failed to strike down a law relying on classification by race.
The Supreme Ct finally killed the Exec. Order late in 1944, far later than they should have (if anything ever called for emergency action, it was this order). I’m not really trying to defend the SCOTUS in this case. However, as far as legal precedent, the SCOTUS did rule against FDR.
I guess you weren't paying attention. Korematsu has been explicitly and unmistakably overruled.
"The forcible relocation of U. S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis of race, is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of Presidential authority. But it is wholly inapt to liken that morally repugnant order to a facially neutral policy denying certain foreign nationals the privilege of admission. See post, at 26–28. The entry suspension is an act that is well within executive authority and could have been taken by any other President—the only question is evaluating the actions of this particular President in promulgating an otherwise valid Proclamation. . . . Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the court of history, and—to be clear—“has no place in law under the Constitution.” Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392 (2018).
Your doom has been averted.
IMO, much of this is the fault of the legislative branch. It has abdicated much of its constitutional responsibilities to the executive branch AND the regulatory state while at the same time expecting a corrupt judicial branch to curb the excesses of the executive branch.
Though. in the final analysis, the fault really lies with the American people for worshiping a pagan idol - the government.
Thirty?
No. Thirty is too hard to divide by nine.
They’ll need thirty-six.
RetiredTexasVet wrote: “Will the Supreme Court of the US accept the 30 pieces of silver when the Executive Orders to place US citizens in virtual or physical internment camps for refusing the Wuhan/Fauci virus mRNA treatments?”
Every day the anti-vaxxer hysteria resembles the Y2K hysteria.
If you dig a bit, you can probably find pictures of the FEMA trailers placed in Utah to house conservatives when Clinton declared martial law after Y2K.
To be precise, most people of Japanese decent were sent to relocation camps. They were not interned. Some were released or exempted if they had a place to go. Of course most did not. Those relocated were only from the exclusion zones and were ordered out at the discretion of military commanders. Ironically the Japanese in Hawaii were not forced out. There was no national roundup. FDR’s orders never mentioned race or national origin. About one third were not US citizens.
It aint going to happen. Put down whatever you are smoking. If a ruling like that ever came down, they would have to get to shot.
At this point I honestly think they should try it. Go ahead…
The Supreme Ct finally killed the Exec. Order late in 1944, far later than they should have (if anything ever called for emergency action, it was this order). I’m not really trying to defend the SCOTUS in this case. However, as far as legal precedent, the SCOTUS did rule against FDR.
The USSC suspended EO 9066 but never ordered it to be terminated. President Ford did that in 1976. The Ford administration should also get credit for unfreezing Japanese bank accounts owned by Issei like my my maternal grandmother and paternal grandfather.
And invites to the right parties
Yet they let you post your drivel here. Check the way it is going in Australia for a look into our future if this vaccine farce continues. It doesn't prevent Covid so what does it do that governments the world over are so insistent that every man woman and child receive it?
Vaxxed start rioting(joined by unvaxxed black looters) and the SC will fold.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.