They will accept it without payment. There is only one answer to this.
State Security and Public Health trump every “right” in the Constitution, and magically transform limited government into unlimited government. Of course the court would go along.
Thirty pieces of silver?
Nope, just a good editorial from the clowns at the NYT.
They are inconsistent with that precedent obsession. They refused to hear any of the lawsuits pertaining to changes made in election rules/laws, as decided in Bush vs. Gore in 2000. According to Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, State Legislatures are the only entity that can create election laws, yet we saw several instances, where public officials, and not Legislators made changes to the laws and rules pertaining to the 2020 election. They ignored their own precedent, so its anybody's guess how they will proceed. As far as I'm concerned, the Supreme Court has destroyed whatever credibility it may have once had.
What ‘legal precedent’ for internment? The executive order 9066 that FDR signed which led to the internment of Asian-American citizens was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court and FDR was forced to suspend the order.
On a side note, liberals always start yammering about concentration camps when a Republican becomes President. Please feel free to point out the the two verified instances of mass internment of U.S. citizens over the last 100 years took place under Dem Presidents. The internment of Asian-Americans by FDR during WWII, and the so-called Palmer Raids under Woodrow Wilson that imprisoned thousands of Commies and other leftists with no indictments or trials.
I guess you weren't paying attention. Korematsu has been explicitly and unmistakably overruled.
"The forcible relocation of U. S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis of race, is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of Presidential authority. But it is wholly inapt to liken that morally repugnant order to a facially neutral policy denying certain foreign nationals the privilege of admission. See post, at 26–28. The entry suspension is an act that is well within executive authority and could have been taken by any other President—the only question is evaluating the actions of this particular President in promulgating an otherwise valid Proclamation. . . . Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the court of history, and—to be clear—“has no place in law under the Constitution.” Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392 (2018).
Your doom has been averted.
IMO, much of this is the fault of the legislative branch. It has abdicated much of its constitutional responsibilities to the executive branch AND the regulatory state while at the same time expecting a corrupt judicial branch to curb the excesses of the executive branch.
Though. in the final analysis, the fault really lies with the American people for worshiping a pagan idol - the government.
Thirty?
No. Thirty is too hard to divide by nine.
They’ll need thirty-six.
RetiredTexasVet wrote: “Will the Supreme Court of the US accept the 30 pieces of silver when the Executive Orders to place US citizens in virtual or physical internment camps for refusing the Wuhan/Fauci virus mRNA treatments?”
Every day the anti-vaxxer hysteria resembles the Y2K hysteria.
If you dig a bit, you can probably find pictures of the FEMA trailers placed in Utah to house conservatives when Clinton declared martial law after Y2K.
It aint going to happen. Put down whatever you are smoking. If a ruling like that ever came down, they would have to get to shot.
At this point I honestly think they should try it. Go ahead…
Vaxxed start rioting(joined by unvaxxed black looters) and the SC will fold.