KEY 01 – Opening Ceremony – World Health Summit 2021, Stefan Oelrich (13 mins, start 1:29:03)
Posted on 11/06/2021 1:49:40 PM PDT by ransomnote
At this year’s World Health Summit Stefan Oelrich, President of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, gave a truly eye-opening speech revealing how the so-called “experts” think and quite frankly, taking his speech in the round, it’s chilling.
Every October, the World Health Summit draws international “experts” from academia, politics, the private sector, and civil society to Berlin. The 13th World Health Summit was held in Berlin over the 3 days 24 – 26 October 2021. There were 67 sessions with 377 speakers involving 6,000 participants from 120 nations. The Summit’s partners include: Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche, Wellcome, Biogen, Novartis, Bayer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Not many will be surprised that another speaker at the Summit was Rick Bright, Senior Vice President Pandemic Prevention and Response at The Rockefeller Foundation and, of course, Bill Gates was glaringly in attendance.
Ignoring the unprecedented injury, illness and death Covid injections are causing worldwide and gaslighting its victims, Oelrich begins: “This past year the life sciences have really emerged as the light in the darkness of the Covid-19 pandemic. Its value to society recognised to a degree rarely seen before, certainly not during my lifetime or at least working in this industry. We have many reasons to be proud of it … I think unprecedented collaboration, transparency but also taking accountability for health across all different sectors and stakeholders.”
Oelrich continues: “Our successes over these 18 months should embolden us to fully focus much more closely on access, innovation and collaboration to unleash health for all, especially as we enter, on top of everything else that is happening, a new era of science – a lot of people talk about the Bio Revolution in this context”
What is this Bio Revolution “a lot of people talk about”?
The McKinsey Global Institute states: “a confluence of advances in biological science and accelerating development of computing, automation, and artificial intelligence is fuelling a new wave of innovation. This Bio Revolution could have significant impact on economies and our lives, from health and agriculture to consumer goods, and energy and materials.”
Oelrich then focuses on family planning: “We also need to focus on what is socially responsible outside of Europe and ensure sustainable action there. We pledged, this past year, to give an additional hundred million women access to contraception in the world. We’ve invested 400 million this year into new plants that are dedicated to produce long-acting contraceptives for women in low-and-middle income countries … Together with Bill and Melinda Gates we’re working very closely on family planning initiatives.”
He reveals some truths: “Innovation is also sustainability at a totally different level because those that take the leap to drive innovation in a really meaningful way and take the risk to invest in R&D will also attain sustainability by creating job security and prosperity for those that take the investment.”
It is important to understand what globalists mean when they use specific words. One such word is “sustainability.” When you understand that the meaning of “sustainability” within the UN’s Agenda 21/2030 framework includes reducing and maintaining the world’s population at a level the globalists deem “sustainable” and easily controllable by them; then you will better understand how “family planning” and “innovation” fits into their “sustainability” plan.
And, only when we understand the globalists’ concept of “sustainability” are we able to understand Oelrich’s remark: “attain sustainability by creating job security and prosperity,” not for everyone but, only “for those that take the investment.”
Rosa Kiore, who sadly passed away earlier this year, with others established The Post Sustainability Institute to study the impacts Agenda 21/2030 is having on liberty. Kiore explains the full meaning of “sustainable development” in a 16-minute video and it’s highly recommended you watch it before listening to Oelrich’s speech, watch Kiore HERE.
Finally, for anyone who still believes the Covid injections are vaccines to artificially induce immunity to a virus Oelrich leaves us in no doubt as to what it is. “We are really taking that leap [to drive innovation] – us as a company, Bayer – in cell and gene therapies … ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate,” Oelrich said.
You can hear Oelrich’s speech at the World Health Summit 2021 below.
ransomnote: the video of the speech is embedded on the article's linked webpage and is also available to watch directly on Youtube: KEY 01 - Opening Ceremony - World Health Summit 2021 - YouTube
KEY 01 – Opening Ceremony – World Health Summit 2021, Stefan Oelrich (13 mins, start 1:29:03)
PING
Some of the public is declining the experimental gene altering toxic stuff called a vaxx.
Pandemic? They’re not agreeing to the vaccine over the pandemic not anymore than they’re agreeing to biden being in the White House because he won the electoral vote or even the popular vote. They all know he did not, yet they’re letting him assume the presidency. And doing a very bad job, by the way. They’re doing what they’re told to do by the media and by their jobs. Period.
So the pandemic was good for him and his cohorts.
Another co-incidence. Aren’t they lucky devils?
This is really a non-sensical article.
The drugs wouldn’t have been made WITHOUT the pandemic either.
I’m pro-vaccine and I think the mRNA vaccine-tech may eventually prove fruitful. But - A: It’s untested and the technique as a vaccine has failed EVERY SINGLE TIME it’s been utilized. Either through health issues or because it was in effective. B: because of A, mRNA therapies have never been used on a wide scale like this before. It’s one thing to know what the potential side effects are. It’s one thing to see the side effects on the test group. But the biology of the human race is far, FAR more vast and variable than any lab testing can prove out. Utilitizng it on the most at risk was prudent. MANDATING IT ON THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE (as they’re trying to do) is jawdroppingly STUPID and dangerous - especially for a flu that has a less than 2% death rate.
” I think the mRNA vaccine-tech may eventually prove fruitful.”
You’ll; be one of the first to find out since you’re one of the test subjects.
A large swath of us still have not agreed and will never agree.
We might agree on some DIY Nuremberg Trials though.
Slowly the truth that we all knew is coming out.
What makes you think I’ve taken it?
I said MAY EVENTUALLY prove fruitful.
Bayer: from Nazis to gene therapy on an uninformed public. 🤔
They don't seem so different.
I am part of that public. Haven’t had one of those shots and have no plan to. Haven’t had covid either.
I am part of that public. Haven’t had one of those shots and have no plan to. Haven’t had covid either.
Click The Pic To Donate.
Hey stevee. Still not.
Hey stevee. Still not.
Little late aren’t ya...Who silenced you until now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.