Cool.
Check back on ‘em in five years and we can look at the long term effects.
The shots cut the risk of coof in 905 of people. The other 10% got infected and some died.
It’s obviously a success when 10% of the shot victims get the disease when untainted people contract it at a rate of less than 1%.
It is 99.98% survivable without drugs or doctors by people under the age of 50. I am almost 70 and survived it with ease and have the IgG and IgM antibodies to prove it.
It is a flu, period.
When do we get to address the fact that it was an act of biological warfare by the Chinese Communist Party on every human being on the planet?
LOL!
So France's health system commissioned a study to look at itself?
Stirring the pot again?
Then we’ll rush right out and...... Nah! 💉=🔥🐂💨💩
BS
So does HCQ + zinc + the various prevention protocols at much less costs and no death or side effects.
Sorry, considering the source, I’ll not waste the time.
Hmmm... You mean the same as the monoclonal antibody treatment without the vaccine?
“This means that those who are vaccinated are nine times less at risk of being hospitalised or dying from Covid-19 than those who have not been vaccinated,”
Those that get the vax will just die later on from other vax complications. Nothing to see here you lemmings. Just do as your ordered.
our citizens are being required to be used as experimental lab rats while our government doesn’t require the hundreds of thousands of disease carrying invaders it’s spreading across our country during a “global pandemic” to participate in the same experiment...
our government’s actions and double standards prove the kung flu is a scam...
Was this research paid for by Big Pharma?
Well, since they said “90%” this time instead of “95%” like they’ve been saying forever, it must be true.
Cuts risk for what.... 3 months?
They followed the medical condition of 22.6 million people?
Pull the other one.
Now please explain why COVID cases and deaths in 2021 with the vax are ten times higher than the same period last year without the vax:
Check out the time period. I bet the same “study” would have different results today.
The vaxxed die after the shot, at home, and the deaths are called something else - like my dear neighbor who had a massive stroke after her vax.
They aren't counted.
PS - what is it about Germany that breeds liberals???
For example, two Israeli vaccine studies contradict each other on their findings but the Guardian only mentions the one that fits its narrative, a clear sign of journalistic bias which is not surprising as The Guardian has been known for a long time to be a mouthpiece for socialism.
Scrolling down and digging a little coughs up the following salient blurb:
So why would Mahmoud Zureik put out crap?
Ans. Bureaucracy bows to policymakers that control its funding. For those who've served in government, you have no doubt heard your supervisor tell you to get the results out asap when very preliminary data fits what the policymakers want to see even as you know the 'work product' is not ripe.
So why would Mahmoud draw attention down into the article that the evaluation period was so short? My guess is he has a guilt twang of scientific ethics bubbling out. He's likely prefacing his results to the broad scientific community who will rip his reputation to shreds if he puts out crap, so he mentions a caveat. This is typical in bureaucracy.
9/10 Vaccinated elderly people over 65 surveyed said...Well, they actually couldn’t comment because of dissolution.