Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

French study of over 22m people finds vaccines cut severe Covid risk by 90%
theguardian.com ^ | 11 Oct 2021 | Kim Willsher

Posted on 10/14/2021 10:20:42 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper

Vaccination reduces the risk of dying or being hospitalised with Covid-19 by 90%, a French study of 22.6 million people over the age of 50 has found.

The research published on Monday also found that vaccines appear to protect against the worst effects of the most prevalent virus strain, the Delta variant.

“This means that those who are vaccinated are nine times less at risk of being hospitalised or dying from Covid-19 than those who have not been vaccinated,” the epidemiologist Mahmoud Zureik, who oversaw the research, told Agence France-Presse.

The study – the largest of its kind so far – was carried out by Epi-Phare a scientific group set up by France’s health system, its national health insurance fund, l’Assurance Maladie (CNAM), and the country’s ANSM medicines agency.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: 50eurocentarmy; eussr; fakenews; floridaman; fourthreich; keywordtroll; trumphater; trumpvaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

So... the shot must increase the risk of serious illness


21 posted on 10/14/2021 10:37:59 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Cuts risk for what.... 3 months?


22 posted on 10/14/2021 10:40:40 AM PDT by fwdude (Proudly UNvaxxed )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Vaccination reduces the risk of dying or being hospitalised with Covid-19 by 90%, a French study of 22.6 million people over the age of 50 has found.

They followed the medical condition of 22.6 million people?

Pull the other one.

23 posted on 10/14/2021 10:43:26 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
So France's health system commissioned a study to look at itself?

Who else would you suggest commission such work?

24 posted on 10/14/2021 10:43:30 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Oh yeah. We have a few like that.


25 posted on 10/14/2021 10:44:04 AM PDT by dforest (Freaking insane world. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

all of this taken together shows its other agendas pushing this other than “we care about you”

its money

its population reduction

its damaging world economies

its getting Trump out of office


26 posted on 10/14/2021 10:47:19 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

oh and another:

its increasing totalitarian govt control and intrusiveness and diktats

and its pitting citizens against each other so that they redirect rightful anger away from themselves


27 posted on 10/14/2021 10:49:16 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Great!

Now please explain why COVID cases and deaths in 2021 with the vax are ten times higher than the same period last year without the vax:

France Coronavirus Cases: and Deaths

28 posted on 10/14/2021 10:50:47 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Eliminate government entities and pharmaceutical companies first. If none can be found, keep quiet 🤫 for fear of looking like a compromised fool.


29 posted on 10/14/2021 10:55:45 AM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

So you have no idea...got it.


30 posted on 10/14/2021 10:59:34 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Check out the time period. I bet the same “study” would have different results today.


31 posted on 10/14/2021 11:06:37 AM PDT by GrannyAnn ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
--> “This means that those who are vaccinated are nine times less at risk of being hospitalised or dying from Covid-19 than those who have not been vaccinated,”

The vaxxed die after the shot, at home, and the deaths are called something else - like my dear neighbor who had a massive stroke after her vax.

They aren't counted.

PS - what is it about Germany that breeds liberals???

32 posted on 10/14/2021 11:13:29 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Fraud vitiates everything ᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ࡚ࠢ࠘ ⸝່ࠡࠣ᠊߯᠆ࠣ࠘ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘𐡏⁻ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper; All
If you're going to post garbage from The Guardian, it would be useful to add a link to a more reputable source on actual statistics if they exist or find a previous article that contradicts The Guardian's narrative.

For example, two Israeli vaccine studies contradict each other on their findings but the Guardian only mentions the one that fits its narrative, a clear sign of journalistic bias which is not surprising as The Guardian has been known for a long time to be a mouthpiece for socialism.

Scrolling down and digging a little coughs up the following salient blurb:

Translation: any inference of the real impact given the few weeks of observation yields a load of crap.

So why would Mahmoud Zureik put out crap?

Ans. Bureaucracy bows to policymakers that control its funding. For those who've served in government, you have no doubt heard your supervisor tell you to get the results out asap when very preliminary data fits what the policymakers want to see even as you know the 'work product' is not ripe.

So why would Mahmoud draw attention down into the article that the evaluation period was so short? My guess is he has a guilt twang of scientific ethics bubbling out. He's likely prefacing his results to the broad scientific community who will rip his reputation to shreds if he puts out crap, so he mentions a caveat. This is typical in bureaucracy.

33 posted on 10/14/2021 11:13:41 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

9/10 Vaccinated elderly people over 65 surveyed said...Well, they actually couldn’t comment because of dissolution.


34 posted on 10/14/2021 11:17:00 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Seriously, are you vaccinate damaged?


35 posted on 10/14/2021 11:29:35 AM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Agreed.

I work in a Hosp. sometimes....

I'm old...but I know I've had the 19....early on.

I trust in my body...

I work with young people...22-45...and they have taken the VAX..and the Booster's...

Frankly I don't understand it.

Considering in India...whole states are nearly COVID free...using IVERMECTIN

36 posted on 10/14/2021 11:32:02 AM PDT by Osage Orange (1961 VW Two Door Truck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is all so stupid.

And all for a mild man-made virus weapon which 99.+ percent would survive, and likely never need “jabs” again after the virus — a virus which was politically motivated, and global totalitarian goal oriented.

I can be stupid too...

Hey french fry’s —

How did the Germans so easily take France? The Germans marched in backwards and told the French they were leaving.


37 posted on 10/14/2021 11:32:49 AM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
Agreed. What's even more bothersome is the pro-vaxx crowd here don't seem to discuss this matter.

Possibly because the most vocal proponent of the vaccines in the federal government, Tony Fauci, was also one of those most responsible for promoting and funding the design -- which design was effectuated by people in this country -- of the SARS-COV-2 virus itself. "Released" in China, maybe, but who says Americans can't make anything anymore?

38 posted on 10/14/2021 11:41:57 AM PDT by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

“vaccinate damaged”...lol...you no-vaxx dummies are a hoot.
.


39 posted on 10/14/2021 11:47:22 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Have you noticed that this is an “adult” forum?

We use words rather than emojies.

On this forum you are not cute or funny. With your little comics you say to me: I’m dumb, I have to use cartoons to get a point across.

Look around. WE DONT USE EMOGIES/CARTOONS OR COMICS on FR


40 posted on 10/14/2021 11:53:20 AM PDT by BarbM (FU Pence. You refuse to be alone with a woman, but have no compunction in screwing the USA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson