Posted on 10/06/2021 1:38:28 AM PDT by Grandpa Drudge
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), said that the United States still does not have an FDA-approved vaccine for COVID as he exposed what was really approved by the government agency on “Fox News Primetime.”
The FDA put out a fact-sheet on the Pfizer-BioNTech and Comirnaty vaccines. That’s plural, because one is not the other and the FDA even makes that distinction on their fact-sheet. On the fact-sheet, Pfizer says that the FDA approved the Comirnaty vaccine which was created by Pfizer for the company BioNTech. BioNTech has said that it will not be made available until 2023 or possibly 2024.
Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 says that no employer, including the federal government, can mandate employees get a vaccine that is experimental, meaning under Emergency Use Authorization. This goes back to the Nuremberg Code. It’s Nazi behavior to force innocent people to take medicine into their bodies that they don’t want to as an experiment, and that is exactly what President Joe Biden and his administration are trying to do.
Title 21, Section 360bbb-3 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”) vests the Secretary of Health and Human Services with the permissive authority to grant Emergency Use Authorizations (“EUAs”) providing that appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed: [emphasis added]
1. that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
2. of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
3. of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks. [emphasis added]
(Excerpt) Read more at thebeltwayreport.com ...
By law - if Comirnaty was available in the USA today, the Moderna and J&J vaccines would have to be withdrawn, because they are still non-approved EUA (Emergency Use Authorization).
Then why are Kill Gates of Hell and Fauci still walking free? Come to think of it, why are the Klintoons?
The simple answer is, because they can.
Did the COVID Delta Variant first evolve in vaccinated persons, or in un-vaccinated persons?
It is completely possible that the Delta Variant - which has a modified spike protein - developed as a RESULT of vaccinated persons.
In addition, since it is now clear that vaccinated persons get infected with the Delta Variant, are vaccinated persons infecting un-vaccinated persons who have natural immunity to the original COVID virus?
Political Junkie Too wrote: “The legal distinction is that the Pfizer vaccine is still under EUA and the COMIRNITY vaccine is not, but the COMIRNITY vaccine won’t be available in the United States for another year or two, probably not until the supply of the Pfizer EUA vaccine is used up.”
The Pfizer vaccine is only under the EUA for those under the age of sixteen. Also, the two vaccines are identical with the exception of the labelling.
Yes. They have both been on the same team a long time.
Thanks
Where can you get the COMIRNITY vaccine in the United States?
Also, the two vaccines are identical with the exception of the labelling.
If you read the actual FDA footnote that I posted, you will see that even the FDA says that the two products are "legally distinct."
What are those legal distinctions?
Here is a link to the FDA Factsheet on the two products: VACCINE INFORMATION FACT SHEET FOR RECIPIENTS AND CAREGIVERS ABOUT COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, mRNA) AND PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE TO PREVENT CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) - Revised: 22 September 2021.
Excerpt:
This Vaccine Information Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers comprises the Fact Sheet for the authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and also includes information about the FDA-licensed vaccine, COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA).Can you see the legal distinctions?The FDA-approved COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the FDA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.[1]
[1] The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness
The COMIRNITY drug is "FDA-Approved" while the Pfizer-BioNTech drug is only "FDA-Authorized under Emergency Use Authorization."
Your post is wrong on the facts.
-PJ
FJB is a monster masquerading as a tyrant.
Experimental or not - why should the government have the authority to mandate any drug (other than to federal employees)?! Why can’t I choose not to take pharmaceuticals? They use the excuse of the greater good to poison the individual.
Yes, it can be about control.
All of this leads to the CCP style global social credit score system, and the end of our Republic. It has nothing to do with a virus. It has everything to do with forcing all to comply with a ‘vax passport’ aka Green Passport, starting with ‘proof of vaccination’ in order to buy or sell.
‘The government’ has been infiltrated by globalists for decades, all leading to what is happening now. For the greater good is obvious communist group think.
The legal distinction is important because under the Comirnity jab, Pfizer may be sued for damages related to any adverse reactions. Under the Pfizer-BioNTech jab, Pfizer is not legally liable.
Think about that.
The Comirnity jab will not be available for quite some time.
The Delta variant was first identified in India in December 2020. Vaccinations did not start there until January 2021.
The Delta variant was first identified in India in December 2020. Vaccinations did not start there until January 2021.
And it’s extremely worrisome to me how the group goes along. The majority of people I know seem to think that once it’s “approved” everyone should take it.
“Why force 100% inoculation? We know it’s not for our own good. I really don’t get it. It can’t be just to control”
I think it’s because a significant number of unvaccinated people would be a de facto control group. When the jab begins to display population-level effects, this would make it plain that the jab is killing people.
If there is no control group, the deep state can continue to claim that it is the lambda strain, or the omega strain, or whatever other nonsense they please that is responsible for the die-off.
This virus would be over in 60 days if the gummit would allow Ivermectin over the counter. You would take one pill a week and end of virus.
Well why don't they just come out and tell us what those "certain differences" are?
Yeah so?
Political Junkie Too wrote: “If you read the actual FDA footnote that I posted, you will see that even the FDA says that the two products are “legally distinct.””
That’s distinction without a difference. Did you read the material you posted? The part about ‘identical’ and ‘interchangeable’?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.