Posted on 09/22/2021 9:54:45 AM PDT by algore
Researchers from New York University took blood samples from 36 babies delivered by mothers given either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine.
Results showed they all had coronavirus-fighting antibodies. Mothers in the second half of their pregnancy had the highest antibody levels in the blood in their umbilical cord, the study found.
Experts said the results weren't surprising because it happens with other jabs.
But they insisted that findings prove vaccines have the 'power to protect two lives at once by preventing severe illness in both mothers and babies'.
Dr Ashley Roman, an obstetrician at NYU and one of the lead authors said: 'If babies could be born with antibodies, it may protect them in the first months of their lives, when they are most vulnerable.'
And there is no evidence the vaccines have any negative effects on unborn children, with spike in birth defects or stillbirths recorded in inoculated mothers.
The CDC was able to report that there were no safety concerns.
Since then, the number of pregnant American women who have had a vaccine has risen to more than 105,000. However, finer data released from within that study set off fresh anxieties.
The CDC closely monitored more than 800 participants. Of that group, 712 had a live birth, while 115 suffered a loss of pregnancy.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
well, duh.
ummm, how could she NOT???
Dear God in heaven...
One word, Thalidomide.
Or maybe she had gotten CoVid naturally.
I know at least one sweet young pregnant woman who wont ...
She prefers to protect her baby even though she is missing out on nice things right now including travel ...
Meanwhile they wont tell us about the dangers to unborn babies in death birth defects and miscarriages ...
If it doesn’t kill them first.
But when nursing babies break out in rashes, fevers or, even die (2 cases I’m aware of), sickening the day that ‘mom’ gets the ‘vaccine, it’s nothing but crickets.
I could be wrong, and would welcome correction, but I think I see fancy word play.
For years, people got injections against flu. That injection didn't meet the definition of a formal vaccine, so people got a flu "shot" and it was no big deal.
COVID comes along, people talked about a "vaccine", and the FDA changed the definition of the word "vaccine", but people still knew the mRNA injection wasn't a typical vaccine, so people called it a "jab". It was a put-down.
Now the press sees a supposed benefit from the jab in the case of pregnant women. Now the wordsmith turn that game around. Benefits from the COVID "jab"? Oh, why, that's not surprising! Happens all the time with other "jabs". You know: other "vaccines".
As the Left often does, they changed the use of the word. "Jab" was a put-down for a fake vaccine. Now the press uses "jab" as a complete synonym of "vaccine", which takes a standard put-down off the table.
and then there’s the mother who waited till after she gave birth and then got the jab ...
She was breast feeding and passed on the poison through her milk to her 3 week old healthy baby who died a few days later ... from the jab ...
“Since then, the number of pregnant American women who have had a vaccine has risen to more than 105,000. However, finer data released from within that study set off fresh anxieties.”
“The CDC closely monitored more than 800 participants. Of that group, 712 had a live birth, while 115 suffered a loss of pregnancy.”
Nothing to see here folks!
I see the data is still skewed to the 3rd trimester. IIRC, when the data from the original study was analyzed not as a whole but rather by the trimester when the shot was administered, the miscarriage rate for the 1st trimester was huge. Then the story disappeared. Is there newer data?
Also, fine that the antibodies make it to the babies. But has anyone checked to see if the spike proteins got there too?
>>> The CDC closely monitored more than 800 participants. Of that group, 712 had a live birth, while 115 suffered a loss of pregnancy. <<<
That’s 6.9 “lost” per 800 pregnancies.
The US infant mortality rate was 5.6 per 1,000 in 2019. (CDC)
But of the ones who had the vax in the first 20 weeks it is 80% miscarriages. They hide it by using the total number of pregnancies rather than breaking it down.
The problem is that women will see this and mistakenly believe the jab is safe to take during pregnancy... I have already seen claims that it is safe for pregnant women to take.... I don’t think so.
The anti-bodies may well be fine, the vaccine during pregnancy is unlikely IMO to be fine and places the baby at risk.
So it’s unwise to partake of alcohol during pregnancy but a good idea to get the jab...no
They even are pushing to jab infants....just say no.
If you are young and healthy, as most babies are, catching covid and having an uneventful recovery bestows long-lasting immunity... this is good. The protection afforded by a problematic experimental vaccine may not be so safe, nor is it long-lasting, nor does it deliver immunity for new variants...there is data suggesting natural-immunity does.
Now, if a woman who has recovered from covid, and has anti-bodies against the disease becomes pregnant and is able to pass that natural immunity on to her baby, this is perhaps ideal.
I’m thinking that “jab” is British. This is Daily Mail UK, that’s all.
I agree that in the US, those opposed have grabbed the term to use it disparagingly, as this isn’t even a flu “shot”, let alone a “vaccine”.
Three armed babies take to juggling easily, so there is that.
Right now, they're aiming for 2 years and up but I have seen six months talked about. They just seem bound and determined to get this crap into every living human. Bizarre.
“That’s 6.9 “lost” per 800 pregnancies.
The US infant mortality rate was 5.6 per 1,000 in 2019. (CDC)”
I am very confused by your statement. Are you using new math or something ?
115/827 = 13.9% or more than double the normal rate of 5.6%
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.