Better start with keeping your blood serum vitamin D levels up...
TRANSLATION: “Get the jab, plebes!”
“Please don’t take this $1 a pill, generic protease inhibitor. We’re about to develop a $2,000 a pill protease inhibitor.”
Ivermectin is not a covered countermeasure.
And liability protection offered through the PREP Act only accrues to those dispensing covered countermeasures.
Hmmmm.....
Why would they discredit a drug they readily sell if their studies showed it not effective?
Gee, for something that's been around for decades. Sure seems like there's a lot they don't know.
So your take they are lying about ivermectin so they’ll lose money on sales or they feel pressured to deny ivermectin for Covid by fda and the Biden regime?
Remember when Merck tried to push the HPV vax on school children. When TX Gov. Goodhair Perry got his hands slapped, he snuck it into the schools by offering the vax “free” through school nurses.
Merck is just as corrupt as the rest of them.
For public safety, Merck should be busted up into smaller companies.
Um... guys...
Line 4:
“...We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information...”
Translation: “We don’t trust it if you go beyond the recommended dosage and if you fall under the category where it’s not suggested”.
Heck, you could say that about aspirin.
my $0.02
p
The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
Says the company whose stock was under $10 pre pandemic and is now over $500.
Yep, completely honest. No conflict of interest at all. Not even a whiff of duplicity. Trust them 100%. I honestly don’t know why we all make like Muslims and bow down and pray to Merck and Pfizer HQs 5 times a day.
“We do not believe”
The Covid cult strikes again.
Merck - big pharma press release
To understand the Merck statement you must parse what they said very carefully.
1. They did not do any studies themselves. They simply looked at other studies.
2. They found no clinical evidence it worked. However, the published studies that have been done to date were NOT peer reviewed clinical studies, so OF COURSE they found nothing. Real world outcomes have been great, but they are not peer reviewed clinical studies. There may be clinical studies underway, but it will take a long time for them to finish and then go through the peer review process.
Side Note: Hydroxychlorine has also been officially maligned. The highest profile “studies” attacking hydroxychlorine were published in The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine. Both studies have since been withdrawn. (Crickets from the media.)
3. A “concerning lack of safety data” in the majority of studies is a meaningless statement. Any retrospective study looking at actual results will have a hard time even collecting “safety data”.
Side Note: Since ivermectin has been approved and in safe widespread human use worldwide for many years, this has to be considered a deliberately misleading statement.
Side Note: It has uses with animals too, but the “horse dewormer” meme in the media is deliberate misinformation. I’m sure it’s possible to take an overdose of Ivermectin, especially if you take a dose intended for horses.
Side Note: Does anyone really think one of the major drug companies is going to dispute the official governmental and media narrative?
Better start with keeping your blood serum vitamin D levels up...
LIES AND CONSPIRACY AND COLLUSION.
This just pisses me off.
Merck = paid to LIE.
Liars that push the clot shot say things like this.