Interesting reading from page 45/46 on
Interesting vaccine efficacy that should be pointed out consistently and continually. Makes one wonder how the Pfizer vaccine was approved..
And The excuse the FDA/Pfizer used for these descrepacies in the data: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”
In another world and time this would have deserved additional investigation and perhaps would be newsworthy.
PAGE TAKEN DOWN
Gone........................................
Americans mask:
Where in the FDA’s charter are they allowed
to KNOWINGLY lie?
did the FDA LABEL truthfully say:
“Does not protect against COVID or its transmission”
when did they pass a FDA “law” that INFORMED CONSENT
and KOCH’sPOSTULATE are herefore null and void?
Of course. It’s not a vaccine. It’s experimental gene therapy that tricks the body into producing the very spike proteins that rip into lung tissue, scrape thru capillaries until finally creating tiny blockages and clots, and cause massive inflammation to tissues and organs thruout the body.
because they knew it wasn’t a vaccine???
it’s an attenuator
Interesting reading from page 45/46 on
So they promoted the vaccines as a security blanket, a totem to cling to for the fearful, just like the masks which they knew would accomplish nothing.
That by itself is bad, but then letting society go insane and talk about mandating everyone have to take this “vaccine” that is as effective as a placebo (but with risk of adverse effects) is complete malpractice.
All of the vaccines induce production of the spike protein and antibody response, which would result in a positive test result.
Berenson seems to enjoy spelunking through research to find esoteric statistics that he then dresses up with spooky language to make confusing points that sow doubt about the vaccines. Arguing that COVID-19 cases spike after the first dose, he directs people to the Pfizer-BioNTech FDA briefing document, which reports hundreds of “suspected but unconfirmed” COVID-19 cases in the trial’s vaccine group that aren’t counted as positive cases in the final efficacy analysis.
But “suspected but unconfirmed” doesn’t refer to participants who were probably sick with COVID-19. On the contrary, it refers to participants who reported various symptoms, such as a cough or a sore throat, and then took a PCR test—and then that test came back negative.
“Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
Suspected that these are just normal vaccine reactions.
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Risk for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Developers
“Because if the gun is jumped, and a vaccine is widely distributed that is disease enhancing, that would be worse than actually not doing any vaccination at all.”
So does Deep State consider this a bug or a feature...
Just like they, and the CDC knew the PCR swab tests couldn’t tell the difference between the flu and Covid, but they went with them anyway, and are still using them until the 31st of December, when their use will be discontinued. Everything about this has been one big freaking lie.
I’d say unbelievable but it’s fully believable.
The government lies and covers the lies. The good news is they suck at everything so eventually the lies and data to prove it eventually comes out.
Question: If the FDA said that the COVID vaccine was 85-95% effective (depending on which jab,) doesn’t that imply that there would be COVID cases among the vaccinated?
Truths which contradict the narrative are misinformation for they cause the hearer to not believe the narrative. Misinformation is never newsworthy...especially true and relevant misinformation.
The most dangerous person to an unvaccinated individual is a vaccinated person.
And they knew it.
ping
ANYBODY with enough intelligence to read and know that 95% is less than 100% knew that vaccination was not 100% effective against the COVID-19 virus.