Posted on 08/11/2021 9:49:20 AM PDT by zek157
Pg 42 in the FDA source: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
“Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
(Excerpt) Read more at fda.gov ...
I’d say unbelievable but it’s fully believable.
The government lies and covers the lies. The good news is they suck at everything so eventually the lies and data to prove it eventually comes out.
That didn’t take long.
Can you visualize the panic there this morning?
I’ve seen this kind of thing before.
How many think the giverment is not Big Brother now?
Words do have specific meaning, especially in this context. Suspected COVID-19 vs a sore arm…
Whatever lack of interest floats your boat is ok with me, but the authors of the material specifically refer to suspected cases instead of vaccine reaction.
It was my messed up links.
“Words do have specific meaning, especially in this context. Suspected COVID-19 vs a sore arm…”
Obviously you didn’t read the FDA paper ...
“Whatever lack of interest floats your boat is ok with me, but the authors of the material specifically refer to suspected cases instead of vaccine reaction.”
If you had read the paper you would see that they specifically did.
What about someone with covid symptoms testing negative for flu a, flu b, and strep, before covid tests were available?
Did they stop testing for flu a, flu b, and strep, —after— covid tests were available?
Question: If the FDA said that the COVID vaccine was 85-95% effective (depending on which jab,) doesn’t that imply that there would be COVID cases among the vaccinated?
I don't know the answer to that question, but the fact that there hasn't been a large number of flu cases over the past two winters, tells me that they were misdiagnosing people. If you use the same test to determine flu cases and Covid cases, and you end up with much fewer flu cases than in years past, then something's not right.
My question is why aren't they checking peoples' blood to see if they already have the antibodies in their system, before jabbing them? I highly doubt they are doing that.
Truths which contradict the narrative are misinformation for they cause the hearer to not believe the narrative. Misinformation is never newsworthy...especially true and relevant misinformation.
Ever since I received my second pfizer shot 2 months ago I still do not feel 100%, I feel like everything is swollen.
The most dangerous person to an unvaccinated individual is a vaccinated person.
And they knew it.
OK.
See how quickly we expect fraud by the giverment though?
We must have overloaded their server!................
Those little spike proteins that the mRNA injection tricked your body into producing can cause inflammation wherever they’re carried by your circulatory and lymphatic systems. This would explain your feeling of being “swollen” — inflammation.
ping
ANYBODY with enough intelligence to read and know that 95% is less than 100% knew that vaccination was not 100% effective against the COVID-19 virus.
Antibody tests are absolutely necessary!
In addition, if the cranked-up PCR tests mistook flu for covid, there’s the chance that folks got the wrong medicines...
Lawsuit time...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.