Posted on 07/25/2021 10:39:10 PM PDT by RandFan
Documents Prove Fauci Knew in 2012 That Vaccines Targeting the Spike Protein Were a Slow Death Sentence
Video...
(Excerpt) Read more at banned.video ...
He didn’t have to. He got Covid so he doesn’t need the vac.
You literally have no idea what in the living hell you’re talking about.
Get off the thread.
Doctors and nurses all over are reporting personal experience with patients having symptoms in very short order after the jabs, and getting pushback by everyone from VAERS to administrators to journals, about publicizing the results.
Lucky him. He survived Covid and therefore does NOT need a vac. So, he logically did the right thing by not getting the vac.
“Get off the thread.”
Blow it out your butt.
Open your eyes and start looking at something other than YouTube! With 160+ million vaccinated, 62% would work out to 100 million people developing “deadly blood clots”!
STUPID! Unless our population has shrunk to 235 million...
My wife - who isn’t vaccinated - is looking forward to the drop in property values after half the country dies. Not sure how happy she’ll be about ME dying from the vaccine...
The anti-vax movement has become as insane as the pro-mask movement! All they need to do is look around them. But instead, like the maskers, they discuss theory ad nauseum while ignoring the world!
agreed
I only watch music videos on YouTube.
D-dimer is a known diagnostic for resolving blood clots; differential diagnosis includes the possibility of cancer.
He didn’t specify how elevated was elevated; and he explicitly said the clots were not large enough for resolution on (say) MRI scans.
He also noted the 62% was in one series of his patients, within a week of the jab.
He did NOT say 62% of ALL people who get jabbed get blood clots; he did NOT say the clots were IMMEDIATELY life threatening; and he did not generalize to every brand of the jabs.
He DID note it was of legitimate concern and warranted further scrutiny.
More than one...it’s actually funny..made me chuckle
You're utterly misinformed.
Here are three or four links to hospitalization/cases/death among the jabbed, from all over the world. Sources like Johns Hopkins and Reuters.
you got to look at this through the eyes of blind belief and realize that it that persons truth and how dare anyone shows how reticules the belief is.
To those on this thread that were insulted that I said this article is stupid I am mocking you heavily becouse I want you to think critically about the dangers involved with an experimental vaccine. Those who think all vaccines are bad at face value are not thinking critically and grabbing everything that supports what they believe with out critical examination just like the idiots who think global warming cling to everything that supports there claim with out critically examine there support.
“Hey, troll-boi, good to hear from you.”
Hey, dimwit.
I see that you’re still pretending to understand the covid studies that you like to copy and paste from.
All the big words serve to give the impression that you know what your reading, despite how you manage to regularly disprove that.
Why someone who dismisses peer review as a joke bothers with studies is a mystery known only in the logic optional world.
“You’re utterly misinformed.”
Over 160 million people are vaccinated in the USA. And no, we’re not dropping like flies. Of the people I know personally, one had problems. She also is in her late 80s, was at extremely high risk for dying from COVID with multiple respiratory issues, and her issues are no worse than my wife had after getting a shingles shot.
She will die soon, if only due to old age. She spent the last year unable to go to the store due to her risk factors and now she can get out.
All the rest of us are doing FINE. Most reported a sore arm for a day or two. I didn’t even have that. And FWIW, I never get the flu vaccine because it always makes me sick for 3-4 days. The military required me to get it every year. When I retired, I stopped because I was tired of getting sick every year.
My wife refuses to take the vaccine because of her reaction to the shingles shot.
This headline is not how good scientist write about a scientific issue. Anyone writing this way destroys his message even if he might have had something pertinent to say.
I will wait for the article to appear in a high quality peer reviewed journal.
This headline is not how good scientist write about a scientific issue. Anyone writing this way destroys his message even if he might have had something pertinent to say.
I will wait for the article to appear in a high quality peer reviewed journal.
You mean like your incorrect usage of the word your instead of you're in the verbatim quote above?
Autocorrect has been the graveyard of many an internet putdown.
Depends on what is published; what field; by whom; the form of the study; and how much it advances or contradicts the "narrative".
"Estimates" from epidemiologists in advance of actual data claimed the coof was going to be worse, in the first wave, than the 1918 Spanish Flu. Hence the cry for severe lockdown measures; and (whether to save face, or for control, or to make Big Pharma $$$$$), the vast overattribution of deaths to COVID, rather than admitting "with COVID, and usually among the elderly with significant co-morbidities".
Blindly quoting (say) Snopes or FactCheck.com like the Coomer meme, no. Pointing out that mainstream sources are saying the same thing as "controversial" sites, when the deboonking depends on labeling all claimants as fringe kooks and grifters, yes.
Here’s some research on the topic that is in the sources you seek:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33926262/
Sorry bud, but the 'anti vaxers' have no monopoly on misinformation. The state-sponsored propaganda/misingformation machine has been rolling for some time now. It has pretty much gotten to be impossible to trust anything.
There are a number of feds that post as 'freepers'. That's pretty much always been true. This site was targeted as a threat to TPTB early on. They often act like children.
agreed you have two groups lying but one group is crazzy the other is either scared or greedy both need to be called out when they lie and bring fourth fake data. the anti vaxers tend to believe there data but the one pushing fake data saying that the vax is not dangerous know they are feeding a bunch of bull crap. the scared are just sheep.
“You mean like your incorrect usage of the word your instead of you’re in the verbatim quote above?”
Lol! That steel trap mind of yours really spotted that one.
I’m certain that the meaning of my original post is easy even for you to understand. You’re a LARPer. You post medical articles as if they back up your claims when they do nothing of the sort.
You misrepresent studies. Either through dishonesty, which I doubt, or because you have no idea what the papers say and you’re counting on the fact that most freepers won’t know either.
Most people’s eyes glaze over reading medical jargon so they won’t see through your little game. It’s clever. It’s like an actor wearing a lab coat and a stethoscope to give the illusion of knowledge. And just as “genuine”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.