“Hey, troll-boi, good to hear from you.”
Hey, dimwit.
I see that you’re still pretending to understand the covid studies that you like to copy and paste from.
All the big words serve to give the impression that you know what your reading, despite how you manage to regularly disprove that.
Why someone who dismisses peer review as a joke bothers with studies is a mystery known only in the logic optional world.
You mean like your incorrect usage of the word your instead of you're in the verbatim quote above?
Autocorrect has been the graveyard of many an internet putdown.
Depends on what is published; what field; by whom; the form of the study; and how much it advances or contradicts the "narrative".
"Estimates" from epidemiologists in advance of actual data claimed the coof was going to be worse, in the first wave, than the 1918 Spanish Flu. Hence the cry for severe lockdown measures; and (whether to save face, or for control, or to make Big Pharma $$$$$), the vast overattribution of deaths to COVID, rather than admitting "with COVID, and usually among the elderly with significant co-morbidities".
Blindly quoting (say) Snopes or FactCheck.com like the Coomer meme, no. Pointing out that mainstream sources are saying the same thing as "controversial" sites, when the deboonking depends on labeling all claimants as fringe kooks and grifters, yes.