You mean like your incorrect usage of the word your instead of you're in the verbatim quote above?
Autocorrect has been the graveyard of many an internet putdown.
Depends on what is published; what field; by whom; the form of the study; and how much it advances or contradicts the "narrative".
"Estimates" from epidemiologists in advance of actual data claimed the coof was going to be worse, in the first wave, than the 1918 Spanish Flu. Hence the cry for severe lockdown measures; and (whether to save face, or for control, or to make Big Pharma $$$$$), the vast overattribution of deaths to COVID, rather than admitting "with COVID, and usually among the elderly with significant co-morbidities".
Blindly quoting (say) Snopes or FactCheck.com like the Coomer meme, no. Pointing out that mainstream sources are saying the same thing as "controversial" sites, when the deboonking depends on labeling all claimants as fringe kooks and grifters, yes.
“You mean like your incorrect usage of the word your instead of you’re in the verbatim quote above?”
Lol! That steel trap mind of yours really spotted that one.
I’m certain that the meaning of my original post is easy even for you to understand. You’re a LARPer. You post medical articles as if they back up your claims when they do nothing of the sort.
You misrepresent studies. Either through dishonesty, which I doubt, or because you have no idea what the papers say and you’re counting on the fact that most freepers won’t know either.
Most people’s eyes glaze over reading medical jargon so they won’t see through your little game. It’s clever. It’s like an actor wearing a lab coat and a stethoscope to give the illusion of knowledge. And just as “genuine”.