Posted on 07/25/2021 10:39:10 PM PDT by RandFan
With all due respect this is a doctor who is piggybacking off the D-diner craze which is a nonspecific indication of inflammation
If 60% of patients had life threatening DVT or PE from these vaccines I wouldn’t have an ICU full of ventilated unvaccinated Covid patients. I would have an ICU full of PE/Stroke/ischemic bowel/MI. They would be on heparin infusions or ECOS.
I have had only one or two patients with life threatening embolus this last year which is about the number I see ever year.
This is fearporn. Plain and simple.
Since I have a monster DVT in my thigh, I’m even more adamant there’ll be no phony vaccine for me.
He’s been on War Room often, too. Very informative.
8000 people die in the US every day. Half of them were vaccinated . Half of them were wearing shorts. So is it the vaccine that’s killing them OR THE SHORTS???
Inquiring minds like Alex Jones want to know.
Which vaccine is mentioned....I didn’t see which vaccine.
Aichi D3A Stukas over Pearl Harbor:
Watch the video. As I wrote in my other post, the doctor is saying bloodshots in the ongoing study occur in about 62% of the patients. Bloodshots are not safe to have, obviously. Jones should have rewritten his headline a little so people wouldn’t think the doctor means “instantly deadly”. It’s permanent damage that can develop in vital organs that can be a problem in the future or in the short term. Thus not everyone is going to just drop dead, but a lot of people have indeed died of heart attacks or other issues. Blood clots can also have serious problems down the road, hence Jones calling them “deadly.”
I believe this as much as I believe that whore doctor in Alabama claiming she's telling people on the verge of dead, "I'm sorry, but it's too late to get the vaccination," when there's been no deaths in Alabama since April of Covid.
I HAVE heard of plenty of vaccinated people dying of heart attacks or now getting sick with Covid, like a majority of all the House Dems who fled Texas.
This was published in March/April in medrXiv, I read it when it first came out.
It might not get published, as Faux-Xi / Big Pharma has a massive vested interest in pretending the jabs are the Second Coming.
(See also for example The Lancet publishing the fake article objecting to the Wuhan Lab theory, which they later had to admit was ginned up by one of those involved in gain-of-function experimentation, and the infamous article in Nature by one of those heavily involved in pushing the jabs internationally, literally accusing those against the jab as being influenced by the same sinister groups who insisted Trump lost the election due to fraud, and saying that "anti vaxxers" push theories like 'the vaccine turns you into a monkey' -- his words, in the article; he went on to demand UN involvement in forcing investigations and sanctions...
Needless to say, peer review is a joke. (See also the reproducibility problem, and the infamous emails from the Climate Research Center at the University of East Anglia).
The link is here:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1.article-info
but it has generally been accepted since (there are other articles by scientists who created vascular problems, IIRC in a mouse model, by created an attenuated Coof virus with spikes but no reproductive proteins; and articles from the Salk Institute describing vascular problems. In addition, the Lancet published a meta-study of COOF sufferers in the hospital showing about 21% of them suffered deep vein thrombosis as opposed to nominally 2%-3% of non-coof hospitalized patients, most commonly knee- and hip-replacement.
You have I guess hears what you want. Heart attacks are the leading cause of death in the United States. Linking them to the vaccine is as flimsy as this article.
You say you doubt what I said. So what does a life threatening blood clot look like. I would like to hear your data that is objective. What are you looking for. Define life threatening clot
I am interested in your clinical judgment.
Then really what you are pointing out is that the blood clotting is potentially a life limiting, "time bomb" . Rite ?
A previous posting indicated a life expectancy of approximately 3 years after a D-dimer positive testing, and referenced the effect the clotting has on vital organs.
Yeah, perfectly healthy people of all ages just dropping dead of a heart attack days or a week after a vaccine shot. Flimsy as hell. Sure. Right.
It sounds too much like Global Climate Change. You can’t see evidence of it but it will eventually kill you.
Correct, that's what the doctors in that interview were discussing. As far as any time limits, 3 years or any limit, the doctor didn't mention any time limits unless my memory is really faulty.
Why do you call it false data? How do you know it is false? You say you want a meaningful conversation but you stifle that and make an accusation right from the beginning that only you have the truth, which you do not.
If you were being honest, which you are not being honest, instead of acting virtuous, then your post would be of that nature.
Again you have not demonstrated what exactly is live threatening blood clots — as you may or may not know heart attacks are caused by rupture of cholesterol packs — not blood embolic phenomena in the overwhelming majority of situations.
So, believe what you want, but in a region of 12M people where I live, I suspect that if 50% vaccinated rate had 60% of life threatening blood clots we would be looking at 3.6M incidents of life threatening disease — surely one or two of those might turn up in the ICU.
You have noting to stand on but emotion — basic math shows this is incorrect.
This is true.
The article is STUPID. Every bit as STUPID as those who claim masks work without looking around them and seeing the overwhelming evidence that they do not!
This isn’t open for discussion because anyone with eyes can look around at the millions who have been vaccinated and KNOW the article is Democrat-grade DUMB!
And half were idiots making stupid observations.
Were deaths to be immediate, few would get vaccinated.
However, a three-year latency would allow sufficient saturation for maximum damage.
Not a believer necessarily but I wouldn't have believed anyone who 'predicted' 2020.
*PFM - Poo-Flinging Monkey
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.