Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy

Watch the video. As I wrote in my other post, the doctor is saying bloodshots in the ongoing study occur in about 62% of the patients. Bloodshots are not safe to have, obviously. Jones should have rewritten his headline a little so people wouldn’t think the doctor means “instantly deadly”. It’s permanent damage that can develop in vital organs that can be a problem in the future or in the short term. Thus not everyone is going to just drop dead, but a lot of people have indeed died of heart attacks or other issues. Blood clots can also have serious problems down the road, hence Jones calling them “deadly.”


67 posted on 07/26/2021 6:13:56 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans; AppyPappy
Greetings_Puny_Humans :" It’s permanent damage that can develop in vital organs that can be a problem in the future or in the short term.
Thus not everyone is going to just drop dead, but a lot of people have indeed died of heart attacks or other issues.
Blood clots can also have serious problems down the road, hence Jones calling them “deadly.” "

Then really what you are pointing out is that the blood clotting is potentially a life limiting, "time bomb" . Rite ?
A previous posting indicated a life expectancy of approximately 3 years after a D-dimer positive testing, and referenced the effect the clotting has on vital organs.

71 posted on 07/26/2021 6:29:20 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson