Posted on 07/23/2021 3:37:34 PM PDT by ransomnote
Blackrock is also buying up entire new home tracts all over the country with plans to rent them out. Remember the Marxist mantra is “you’ll own nothing...and be happy.” We’re renting currently but plan to buy a house again in the near future. I’m just afraid we might miss the boat by then thanks to greedy companies like Blackrock and progressive politicians in DC.
I honestly believe that any doctor who believes that people should be forced to get the jab (or coerced) should have their medical license revoked.
“ I’m getting tired of “the jab will kill you” and “ you can get covid again” threads.”
That’s odd. What about freedom to refuse the jab? Maybe you have a case of buyer’s remorse? Maybe you chose to be vaxxed and that’s your privilege, so let others choose.
Otherwise, it’s the exact opposite of what your page stipulates!
https://freerepublic.com/~mikelets456/
Just say no to the click .
Would NEVER be happening if they would have allowed treatment methods to go forward. Instead they crucified anyone, including DJ Trump for even mentioning treatment methods.
With EARLY treatments, the death rates for this thing would have been way less. EARLY treatments. Not waiting till they had to be put on a machine.
The more the liars like Dr Mengele Fauci push this thing, the less people will accept it.
This guy is done. They will crucify him.
Anyone remember when DJ Trump had that presser and he said that big pharma doesnt like him? And that he might not be around?
Remember that?
Helpful Tip
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/blackrock-vanguard-own-big-pharma-media/ ?fbclid=IwAR2dlPB3vJyb7uNwIDMIS-jEPlUUL5XNE2oBf_KJjCNDgcI9G0PcfgDD65I
I broke the link into two parts. The first part is the actual link and is all you need. The second part starts with ?fbclid and is a facebook derived url and they’ll get credit for it on many websites or in email campaigns. The website’s analytics will consider facebook as the source of the link.
On most links like that, the question mark and everything after it can be removed.
Click them both and they both go to the same page but the long link will make Children’s Health Defense think you’re coming from facebook.
I take my vitamins, follow a healthy lifestyle, use hand sanitizer when I’m out, try to keep my distance around strangers, and pray. I have no plans to get the vaccine at this time, especially since the virus I experienced wasn’t severe enough to warrant putting an experimental substance into my body. I’ve never gotten a flu shot either because I’ve never had the flu, so I must be doing something right.
Amen.
Probably ought to just scroll on by posts by ransomnote then. Many of us scroll on by certain threads due to the subject.
Will anyone, in his right mind, knowingly inject poison into his body to “stop COVID?”
No.
And in case you were curious, I’m not going to sprinkle rat poison on my dinner, either.
Only a fool will listen to these Satanic Deep State Creeps and their incessant lies about “safe and effective” poisons.
Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you
you read my mind
And the big pharma vax shills will discredit everything about someone, no matter how credentialed they are.
The legitimate credentials of people who are experts in their fields mean nothing to anonymous, internet vax shills, who have very little credentials or experience themselves.
1. The first would be the temporal relationships, so I told you, in time, it's really closely related to the injection.
If the doctor understands VAERS I'm a little surprised he doesn't see the fallacy in this temporal relationship line of thought.
Since VAERS is all based on self-reporting and not on ongoing surveillance it's a given you'll see more events reported close to the vaccination date.
It's simple human nature. If some medical issue arises you'll be much more likely to connect it with a shot you got yesterday than a shot you got 10 days ago.
The only way this analysis has validity is if you actively monitor people getting the vaccine and consistently document issues, and then compare those numbers against a control group that didn't get the vaccine.
Naturally, this list will continue to grow unfortunately.
Keeping in mind that these reports are only a fraction of the data out there and only those reports that the praetorian guard media & tech have let out.
Psaki refuses to answer question on WH ‘breakthrough’ Covid cases… (07.23.2021)
‘Why do you need that information?’
Also keeping in mind, that these vaccines are NOT approved and licensed and are only available to the public at large because of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA). Each of the manufactures were given authorization to "prevent" covid. There is nothing in their EUA's about lessoning hospital stays or deaths. Only, prevention of covid.
Pfizer's EUA:
"the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used in the treatment of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used)."
Moderna's EUA: "Having concluded that the criteria for issuance of this authorization under Section 564(c) of the Act are met, I am authorizing the emergency use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19"
Janssens's EUA: "On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 for individuals 18 years of age and older pursuant to Section 564 of the Act."
Both Moderna and Janssen's EUA's are based on preventing covid. Is this what prevention look like? Pfizer's EUA is based on "may" prevent covid. OK, some wiggle room there. If 1 in one hundred million doesn't get covid, but the other 99,999,999 do after taking their experimental shot, they can say...look, our agreement is that it may prevent covid.
These vaccines were given Emergency Authorization to be widely distributed and administered to "prevent" covid.
How many people, especially those that are not elderly or have pre-existing health concerns who have gotten the experimental medicine, would have changed their minds if they knew they had a much higher percentage chance (than being reported by the govt & the manufacturers) of getting covid, that they would have to got back to wearing a piece of cloth over their mouth and nose and be limited to large indoor (& outdoor) events anyway?
Would they take the chance of getting one or more of the reported side effects knowing the above?
Are these error rates acceptable to meet those EUA's and keep these unlicensed vaccines widely available outside a typical controlled study phase?
AFAIC, if science and honesty were the driving force, their EUA's would be revoked.
you’ll immediately be shamed ‘it’s for the common good’!
***************************************************************************************
But it is not actually for the common good, and there are scientific studies which prove that.
We now know they lied about it being “novel”-it is not totally new and 81% of the population in fact does have existing immunity. We also know that immunity is strengthened, materially so, by natural infection.
A good example is Chicken Pox. If you had that in childhood, then your children and grand children getting it helps tune up your immune system and keep that immunity.
From a public health perspective you want those people who are not going to be seriously harmed to get it naturally, because it is that type of immunity that stops the disease from being of harm to the public on a durable basis.
The existing vaccines are worthless for building said durable immunity since the data is that the nucleocapsid section, which the vaccines do not code, is where most of the pre-existing resistance against serious disease resides.
A traditional inactivated vaccine without the spike protein would be better, and since we now know the spike is leading to damage/deaths, less risky.
The future of the world in terms of public health in fact requires that young and healthy people; be allowed to develop natural, durable immunity.
To these JABs, Lockdowns, Nose diapers, in the face of science documenting that you did it wrong goes beyond the realm of stupid and into the realm of criminal culpability.
I for one, would like to see these ghoulish Quacksters like Fauci arrested, tried, convicted, and punished for crimes against humanity.
They are knowingly coming after the CHILDREN and BABIES with stuff that is NOT good for them.
I don’t give a flying leap what they say about me, I will speak out against the travesty. And I’m phoning and writing my state legislators with all the SCIENCE I can to prove that they need to stand against this crap - and make it clear before school opens - NO MANDATES from anyone.
Some information on the neutralizing nucleocapsid is in this study from Nature Immunology Jan. 2020 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x.pdf
Don’t worry if we beat the commies there will be lots of affordable housing. If we don’t beat the commies it won’t matter.
Thank you for supplying the link, greeneyes!
👍😎You betcha. And ICYMI, here’s another link related to another scientific bit of info:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3978587/posts?page=37#37
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.