There were 104 spontaneous abortions in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy, after receiving an mRNA covid shot.
But 700 of the 827 received the shot in the third trimester, after the 20 week mark. So. 104/127 pregnancies that got the jab in the first 20 weeks were terminated. (Or thereabouts)
At a minimum, the way this was written/analyzed was very poor for the Nejm.
The authors do admit this group (early pregnancy jab getters) need more study.
I’d say this group needs to strictly avoid the jab.
If a more skilled poster can post an image of table 4 - that would be appreciated.
Slowly working their way to a world population of 500,000,000.
GateXi, FauXi, SoroXi, and WHO with the DNC and Xi
have declared WAR on the American people and their children
and those who might have been children.
The DNA operating system did not have work against
either the common cold or their engineered GAINofFUNCTION
version. The goal, was, is, and remains depopulation,
and owning YOUR DNA, which they do if you got the
“Vaccine” per SCOTUS/Malta/Vatican.
“At the time of this analysis, just 14.7% of persons who identified as pregnant in the v-safe surveillance system had been contacted to offer enrollment in the pregnancy registry.”
_______________________________________
Sooo, the researchers really didn’t ask the vast majority of the 30K pregnant women who formed the potential complete study group what became of their pregnancy?
Am I interpreting this correctly?
“””115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%);”””
The vax is almost as effective as abortions.
Ping
“...Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons...”
Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes. . . . Table 4 (excerpt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They have no proof it’s safe. They kick the can down the road and say it has to be studied more - and in the mean time they push the vaccine. They have an agenda - to inject as many as possible before people rebel. These ‘vaccines’ send spike proteins throughout the body within 48 hours, collecting in the spleen, liver, ovaries and other organs. They lie when they say it just stays in the arm.
Vaccinated women have spontaneous abortions. They have the head of the CDC, and Fauci urging pregnant women to get vaccinated. This is biowarfare conducted in part by the CDC, which is funded by Bill Gates through it’s Foundation (501c3). NOTHING that happens will be accepted as a reason for caution or to protect women and infants.
How about potential long term risks to mother or child? It’s...”experimental”...
Can someone please define the term “completed pregnancy”?
Apparently it includes miscarriages and stillbirths. What kind of completion is that?
MY God am i the only one seeing this!! we are looking at a bio-weapon!! what are the statistics of women going on to have babies after the first trimester when they don't get the jab.?
I bet it's huge in the 90 percentiles.!!
Some here are not getting it:
THIS IS A BIOWEAPON,THE JAB IS A BIOWEAPON,LITTLE ELSE!!
Thanks for the post; FReepmail; posts. BTTT!
Only 827 of them reported the end of their pregnancy (miscarriage -- 104, stillborn -- 1, live birth -- the rest, but the count in table 4 looks off by 1, I still haven't figured that out). So the other 3000-odd women, never reported what happened.
And the follow up was for a year after the first jab, IIRC, so it isn't a matter of only a three-month window being responsible for the low # of women whose pregnancy was reported.
And that means, you gotta be *very* careful putting a lot of reliance on these numbers.
Pregnant persons?
“Potential adverse effects of nanoparticles on the reproductive system”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294055/pdf/ijn-13-8487.pdf