Posted on 07/05/2021 1:51:00 PM PDT by Triple
A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes. . . . Table 4 (excerpt)
Participant-Reported Outcome Published Incidence* V-safe Pregnancy Registry† % no./total no. (%)
Pregnancy loss among participants with a completed pregnancy Spontaneous abortion: <20 wk15-17...10–26...104/827 (12.6)‡ Stillbirth: ≥ 20 wk18-20...<1... 1/725 (0.1)§
† Data on pregnancy loss are based on 827 participants in the v-safe pregnancy registry who received an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2 [Pfizer–BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, and who reported a completed pregnancy. A total of 700 participants (84.6%) received their first eligible dose in the third trimester.
§ The denominator includes live-born infants and stillbirths.
(Excerpt) Read more at nejm.org ...
The CDC is a malevolent, weaponized federal agency that accepts funding through their 501c3. Largest donor? BILL GATES.
SO the CDC continues to attack us, and urges pregnant women to get 'vaccinated' until more is known, and in the meantime trademarks "SAVING LIVES, PROTECTING PEOPLE!"
MY God am i the only one seeing this!!
____________________________________
Read all of my posts on this thread.
This study is not saying what many of us on that long-running thread series that shall not be named think it is saying.
This study did NOT find that 90% of pregnancies of those who got the vax ended in miscarriage. It found no where near this number miscarried.
We have to be better than this and get our info correct or lose all credibility.
If mommy-to-be dies while still pregnant, does that count as a completed pregnancy?
_________________________________________
It counts as a maternal death and fetal death if the baby wasn’t successfully taken from her.
Either the vax will cause complications that result in a higher than typical number of maternal deaths or it won’t.
Only 827 of them reported the end of their pregnancy (miscarriage -- 104, stillborn -- 1, live birth -- the rest, but the count in table 4 looks off by 1, I still haven't figured that out). So the other 3000-odd women, never reported what happened.
And the follow up was for a year after the first jab, IIRC, so it isn't a matter of only a three-month window being responsible for the low # of women whose pregnancy was reported.
And that means, you gotta be *very* careful putting a lot of reliance on these numbers.
It’s not 30,000, they pulled their numbers in Table 4 from those who were in v-safe.
They tracked them for 1 year after the 1st jab, IIRC.
But they lost touch with around 3000 of those.
That’s a well-known problem in these kind of studies, it’s called “Lost to Follow-Up”.
So the results reported cannot be guaranteed to be representative of all the women who first entered the study; interpret the results with caution.
Grain of salt - the numbers are not well reported.
Check out the link to the supplemental tables- I think that might have a true look at all the first trimester jabs snd their outcomes so far..,
The numbers are better, but still awful. (Low n)
I completely agree with you that it is a problem they lost touch with a lot of the pregnant women.
It could be they miscarried and are too grief-stricken to even report that.
What is needed, however, is data on how typical this drop-off rate by comparing it to the number of pregnant women in other studies who drop out.
If the number here is higher than average, then this needs to be followed up on.
Again, I think there are problems looming.
I just think we need to cool it on this particular study and wait for more data to roll in.
Probably wise..,
Considering that pregnant women were excluded from the initial studies, It seems to me to be highly irresponsible to be advising pregnant women that it is safe-especially for those in the early stages.
I wonder how many of these women received fully informed data before receiving the bio-therapy shot?
Didn’t need this study to conclude that more information on effects of jabs on early term pregnancies is needed. SMH.
The data was collected on 30 March, 2021.
The registry enrolled 3958 participants with vaccination from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021
They were only tracked for 30 days to 106 days, depending on the day they enrolled. The last babies to be born will be in November, 2021. It appears that miscarriages are not a problem, but hopefully all will be born healthy. The first trimester vaccinations are clearly the ones to watch.
Thanks—makes sense. It seems so clinical, but i suppose that’s the point.
Pregnant persons?
Wow… a poster who actually understands the math. Thanks for posting.
“Potential adverse effects of nanoparticles on the reproductive system”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294055/pdf/ijn-13-8487.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
