Posted on 06/05/2021 4:02:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
While the focus has been largely on vaccines, you might have also heard Pfizer is trialing a pill to treat COVID-19.
It almost sounds too good to be true. Indeed, the results are very preliminary — but it’s a promising approach.
Where most antiviral agents we’ve tried to treat COVID-19 target the inflammatory and immune response resulting from infection, Pfizer’s pill directly targets SARS-CoV-2 — the virus itself.
Mounting our defense against the virus Much of the illness associated with COVID-19 is due to the intense inflammatory and immune response that can occur with an infection. The most successful treatments so far have targeted this overzealous immune response.
Taken early in the disease, the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide has been shown to reduce the development of more severe disease.
In people hospitalised with COVID-19 requiring oxygen, the oral corticosteroid dexamethasone reduces the likelihood of death.
In the most severe cases — COVID patients admitted to ICU — the anti-inflammatory tocilizumab administered intravenously gives a person a better chance of survival.
But these treatments don’t target SARS-CoV-2 itself; just the consequences of infection. Directly targeting the virus has proven to be more difficult.
Targeting SARS-CoV-2 A virus like SARS-CoV-2 must enter a host cell to reproduce. It does this using its spike protein (a protein on the virus’ surface) to attach to the cell, and then it uses the cell’s own proteins to gain entry.
Once inside the cell, SARS-CoV-2 removes its outer coat and releases its viral RNA (ribonucleic acid, a type of genetic material). This acts as a template, allowing the virus to replicate, and then infect other cells. At any point of this life cycle the virus could be vulnerable to an intervention.
SARS-CoV-2 carries an enzyme, 3C-like protease (3CLpro), which plays a crucial role in the replication process. This protease is almost identical to the protease used by the SARS-CoV-1 (SARS) virus, and similar to the protease used by the Middle Eastern Respiratory Virus (MERS).
So a drug that could effectively target 3CLpro and prevent virus replication could be beneficial against multiple known coronaviruses, and possibly any that emerge in the future.
SARS-CoV-2 uses its spike protein to attatch to a host cell.
Protease inhibitors have been successfully used to treat other viral infections, especially chronic infections such as HIV and hepatitis C.
They were put forward early in the pandemic as a possible treatment for COVID-19. But the HIV drug lopinavir-ritonavir was shown in two clinical trials to be ineffective, with drug levels probably too low to work against SARS-CoV-2. While a higher dose might be effective, it would also likely produce more side effects.
Scientists also proposed a repurposed antiviral drug, remdesevir, originally developed to treat Ebola. Remdesivir delays the ability of the virus to replicate its RNA.
Initial case reports appeared promising and saw the US Food and Drugs Administration approve the drug for emergency use. But the results of randomized controlled trials in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 were disappointing.
Although there was a reduction in the duration of illness for patients who survived, it didn’t significantly reduce a person’s chance of dying.
Of course, neither of these agents were designed specifically to target SARS-CoV-2. But in 2020, Pfizer/BioNtech identified a small molecule — PF-00835231 — that blocks the SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro protease. It was originally designed against SARS-CoV-1, but the enzyme in the two viruses is almost identical.
PF-00835231, both alone and in conjunction with remdesevir, appears to reduce the replication of a range of coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2 in cells in the lab. It also reduced viral replication in a number of animal models, with no adverse safety signals. But it’s important to note this research hasn’t yet been peer reviewed.
What now? Pfizer/BioNtech are taking two drugs to clinical trials for COVID-19: PF-07304814, an intravenous injection for use in patients hospitalised with severe COVID-19 and PF-07321332, an oral agent, or pill, that could potentially be used earlier in the disease. Both are formulations of a 3CLpro inhibitor.
These phase 1 trials, which began in March, represent the earliest stage of drug development. These trials select healthy volunteers and use different doses of the drugs to establish their safety. They also look at whether the drugs elicit sufficient responses in the body to indicate they could be effective against SARS-CoV-2.
The next step would be phase 2 or 3 trials to see if they improve outcomes in COVID-19. Usually this process takes years, but as the pandemic continues to rage globally, Pfizer says it will do this in a matter of months, if phase 1 trials are successful.
The application of antiviral agents in acute COVID-19 has been difficult and unrewarding. Though results are at this stage preliminary, these agents by Pfizer/BioNtech are promising. They could be used early in disease, especially in people poorly protected by vaccination or in those who haven’t been vaccinated.
They could also be used as a means of prevention, to contain outbreaks in exposed people. They should be effective against all the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, as well as against other known and possibly emergent coronaviruses.
The Pfizer CEO’s recent suggestion the pill could be available by the end of the year is probably a long shot. But the pandemic has shown us what’s possible in the realm of swift scientific advances, and we’ll watch this space with interest.
Written by Peter Wark, Conjoint Professor, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle.
(It’ll be a combination of 10 cent Hydroxy and 10 cent Ivermectin, and they will charge $100 a pill.)
I’ll only take it if it has a toxic spiky protein antibody in it that they guarantee will kill me within three years painfully as possible.
There are a few pills. They denied people left and right last year. Never trust them again.
This is what happens when one smart a** doctor says only a vaccine will take care of this Covid. Same damn sh** he pulled with AIDS.
Precisely.
There have been two cheap, time-tested, readily available remedies from the very beginning.
The health bureaucrats have much to explain.
therapeutics were there from the start.
the medical mafia prevented their use.
criminal.
Agreed
Will the pill be as toxic as the injection?
You beat me to it, Travis. HCQ, Ivermectin, Zinc and azythromycin all rolled up into one and make it pricey.
Peel label off pill bottle and it’ll have have an old ivermectin label underneath
My recipe would be hydroxy, D3 and K2... all harmless but effective.
If a pill, be sure to read the 20-page 4-font document for the possible side affects.
We won’t take jab poison, sneaky way to get the rest of us vaccinated with their poison.
No thank you
Why take a pill for something that is not the issue they claim it is
I trust Pharma about as much as A Democrat which is not at all
I’ve a much better. Not antibodies but blueprints for exponentially creating more deadly disease spikes. Wheee.
My body has done a very good job on its own. Of course with it being such a high survival rate anyway, it doesn’t take much
“I’ll only take it if it has a toxic spiky protein antibody in it that they guarantee will kill me within three years painfully as possible.”
sounds about right to me ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.