Posted on 06/03/2021 8:04:43 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
Looks like the case may be able to be made. They have the pcaps (packet captures) of the election in real time.
It's like having a video of a bank robbery.
Bmk
I shall return.
He’s still going down the China did it route when we know most of it came from here. We watched videos of it and we already know the methods the dems use and we know what election rules were changed to help them with.
Bfl
My question:
Where did he get this info?
Thousands of voting machines, dozens of computers getting the info from the voting machines....that is not something a 13 year old wiz kid can do.
It takes a main frame, someone who knows to be ready at the start time and with the equipment o record all of it simultaneously.
A rogue CIA guy? NSA?
Who?
The who may be as important as the info.
Actually what we saw were ballots being scanned in to match the counts. China was most assuredly involved in a cyber attack on the election.
I agree. He called these guys “white hat hackers”. But how in the world did these guys ‘capture’ this streaming live data flow involving so many computers and so many different states? And why was it these pajama guys could do it and Trump the President was clueless on how to use the NSA?
Bookmark
under maintenance
Maybe this should be deleted and reported when the link works.
Lindell’s sites are under constant attack. Watch it when it comes back up. This is no tin foil hat thing.
The white hats are the forensic cyber security experts Lindell hired.
I think you answered your own question though. The entity which could capture this volume of data is the NSA.
Bookmark
My guess? CIA/NSA
Byrne and his guys
I want to see this when it comes up.
I watched it earlier this evening. Very good video to watch.
I am sure he will be on Bannon’s show to discuss tomorrow.
I’ve watched it, and I have enough background in IT to understand the packet captures and the argument being made. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the work that was done to analyze and verify the contents and that the representation shown is true and correct. In other words, I’ll stipulate that everything presented is 100% accurate.
Here’s the problem: What is the legal mechanism by which this is going to have any effect? The constitution defines the powers of the Supreme Court just as it delegates the running of elections to the States. Under what constitutional basis would the Supreme Court ever agree to hear whatever Mike Lindell wants them to hear? There is a process by which SCOTUS decides which cases it will hear and they reject certori all the time.
While the case that China was behind the cyber crimes that changed the election (God knows they had plenty of motivation, Trump was crushing them) - the case may be compelling as hell but there is no way that I can see that SCOTUS would ever hear it, and there is no constitutional mechanism to do anything about it even if it was “9-0”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.