Actually what we saw were ballots being scanned in to match the counts. China was most assuredly involved in a cyber attack on the election.
I’ve watched it, and I have enough background in IT to understand the packet captures and the argument being made. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the work that was done to analyze and verify the contents and that the representation shown is true and correct. In other words, I’ll stipulate that everything presented is 100% accurate.
Here’s the problem: What is the legal mechanism by which this is going to have any effect? The constitution defines the powers of the Supreme Court just as it delegates the running of elections to the States. Under what constitutional basis would the Supreme Court ever agree to hear whatever Mike Lindell wants them to hear? There is a process by which SCOTUS decides which cases it will hear and they reject certori all the time.
While the case that China was behind the cyber crimes that changed the election (God knows they had plenty of motivation, Trump was crushing them) - the case may be compelling as hell but there is no way that I can see that SCOTUS would ever hear it, and there is no constitutional mechanism to do anything about it even if it was “9-0”.